On 6/18/2019 9:14 PM, AMuzi wrote:
On 6/17/2019 10:34 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 6/17/2019 1:42 PM, AMuzi wrote:
On 6/16/2019 5:44 PM, John B. Slocomb wrote:
On Sun, 16 Jun 2019 13:18:08 -0000 (UTC), news18

wrote:

On Sat, 15 Jun 2019 17:31:28 -0700, Tom Kunich wrote:

Snipped all prior irrelevant stuff to Tom's polly waffle.

I am not "alone". Even using the figures from NASA and
NOAA 46% of
scientists deny that there could be any warming beyond
natural climatic
variability. When you actually look into it NASA and
NOAA have actually
counterfeited the records. They had a problem in that
the Weather
Satellite temperature readings from 1978 onwards didn't
show any heating
and Dr Roy Spencer, the original science manager of the
weather
satellite program, finally resigned when he could no
longer stand the
blatant lies of the NASA and NOAA climate divisions. He
expressed the
belief that these two would very soon begin
counterfeiting the satellite
records to match their computer models and that is now
exactly what they
have been doing.

Tony Heller wrote a program that allows him to search
the daily
newspaper records of every newspaper that presently has
computerized
their records. This gives pretty good records back to
the 1850's. But
actually looking at the daily records in spots all over
the world you
can see that NASA has actually lied about practically
everything. They
have been working VERY hard to make the actual records
look like their
worthless computer models.

You and he obviously do not understand the physics of
temerature
recording. I wont bother posting a link, but there is an
excellent
explanation on the web if you want to search for it.

FWIW, I can acess three temperature records for where I
live and the
actual 'values" are only loosely coupled and one often
varies from the
average be a significant amount.

There is also another report on the web lookng at the
"variation" of
those readings and ointig out that whie the actual
"readings" seem to be
similar to past cyces, there is n actuall fact a lot
more "shuddering/
oscillation" creaping into the recorded temperature.
Which fits in the
the "global warming hypothesis" which is that there is
now more energy in
"the climate" and we are now seeking more(number of, not
peaks) extremes.

Not to mention that "ice caps" and glacier are melting
and seas are
rising.

But than, there are people who believe that the earth is
flat.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern...arth_societies
https://www.livescience.com/24310-fl...th-belief.html
https://nypost.com/2017/06/01/some-p...world-is-flat/





What's needed then is a program to make the glaciers play
along with someone's pet theory:

https://www.reviewjournal.com/opinio...ction-1688833/



Specific deadlines and the like are notoriously difficult to
predict. That's true of everything. But it certainly doesn't
disprove the overall effect. See
https://skepticalscience.com/himalay...rs-growing.htm
or dozens of other sources.

Ever been to Glacier National Park? The photos and views
comparing past and present are pretty startling.


Change is normal.

Some change is normal. Some change is abnormal.

--
- Frank Krygowski