On Monday, June 24, 2019 at 8:20:55 PM UTC+1, Peter Parry wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 09:40:44 -0700 (PDT), Simon Jester
wrote:

On Monday, June 24, 2019 at 1:02:07 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 23/06/2019 21:48, Simon Jester wrote:



It means the court sometimes gets it wrong, as in this case.

There is no indication they got it wrong in this case. The decision
was in line with many similar judgments in the past. Had it not been
for the action of the cyclist (over several years) causing costs to
spiral upwards no one would have taken any notice of the case.

Can you provide evidence for this claim?
You have stated the cyclist in this wrongful lawsuit has committed numerous similar offences over "several years".