View Single Post
  #154  
Old November 8th 04, 01:16 AM
Blair P. Houghton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mark Cook wrote:
"Blair P. Houghton" wrote in message
. ..
Yes, they do. They prove that there's no proof that he won it
at the polls.


I suggest that you read the court decisions on the matter. Gore NEVER made
the claim that all ballots were NOT tabulated. The fact is they were.


Whether Gore made the claim or not, the only count
certified by the State of Florida was the original count,
which could never have accounted for all of the ballots,
and was considered inaccurate by everyone involved.

Again, you are misrepresenting the facts.


You're spinning in your chair and pretending your idiocy
is the facts.

"But no one claims that these ballots have not previously been tabulated;
they were initially read by voting machines at the time of the election, and
thereafter reread by virtue of Florida's automatic recount provision. No one
claims there was any fraud in the election."

http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-949.ZC.html


Not relevant to the fact that Bush didn't win Florida so
much as have the electoral votes handed to him by Supreme
Court fiat.

The ballots were recounted and none of the recounts were
ever included in the certified tally, because federal law
short-circuited Florida law.

Every ballots was counted.


False, and to make that claim you have to be illiterate,
and not just because you pluralized "ballot".

Bush was shown to be the winner. 36 days, and 2
recounts could not prove otherwise. The media recount could NOT prove
otherwise.


You're saying recounts are irrelevant. Which is totally
absurd. Since you've taken to making totally absurd statements,
I'm going to let you keep making them to yourself.

Clearly you do not understand what proof is.


That is a statement you have proved over and over again that you
can not possibly know the meaning of.

--Blair
"Just pull over to the side of the
road and stop crapping your shorts."
Ads
 

Home - Home - Home - Home - Home