View Single Post
  #7  
Old January 13th 11, 06:34 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Tony Dragon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,715
Default another pedestrian injured on the pavement but luckily not bymotorists this time.

On 13/01/2011 17:46, Doug wrote:
On Jan 13, 8:09 am, wrote:
Doug wrote:
On Jan 12, 12:45 pm, wrote:
On Jan 12, 12:31 pm, wrote:


Three of them crashed into her!


http://www.braintreeandwithamtimes.c...erious_runner_...


But at least the cyclists were safe from motorists.


Lucky she wasn't hit by three motorists, which would have been much
worse.


it is good that motorists don't habitually drive on the pavements, a pity
that cyclists won't do the same.

Well given the vastly increased danger that motorists pose it is just
as well they don't habitually drive on pavements but they do crash
there quite often, with disasterous and often fatal results.

-- .
UK Radical Campaigns.
http://www.zing.icom43.net
A driving licence is a licence to kill.


So at last you agree that cyclists deliberately ride on pavements, while
the vast majority of motorist do not deliberately drive on pavements.
Oh, and given the yearly mileage of motorists, they do not crash on the
pavement quite often.
Ads
 

Home - Home - Home - Home - Home