On 16/11/2019 13:52, Simon Mason wrote:

On Tuesday, November 12, 2019 at 8:29:06 PM UTC, TMS320 wrote:
On 12/11/2019 13:45, Simon Mason wrote:

Yet they claim that cyclists are not visible in the dark.

Wouldn't it be better to continue to take the mickey out of drivers that
complain about seeing unlit cyclists?

I have done that he
QUOTE:
"The invisible cyclist was wearing dark green trousers, a dark blue jacket, dark red socks, dark brown shoes, a dark grey hat and he had Sennheiser earpieces in."

That was the violent criminal on a bike who attacked and robbed a
defenceless female than scarpered on his bicycle, wasn't it?

Was there any evidence that his bike was unlit?