View Single Post
  #5  
Old July 28th 05, 07:54 AM
Werehatrack
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Dangerous" Cantilers?

On 27 Jul 2005 15:15:55 -0700, "Robin Hubert"
wrote:

Hit the CR key by mistake ... and now DSL quit ... delay in posting
....

One of our esteemed experts previously suggested that a cantilever
equipped bike without bbl adjusters is dangerous.

"If there are no adjusting barrels provided, the bike is dangerous and
defective. Nobody should accept such incompetence."

I'm baffled by this. Inconvenient, maybe, but dangerous? Defective?


Bloody hard to make a canti setup without adjusters at the levers
unless you cross-breed it with a roadie, innit? I can't see that
working well anyway.

I think the cited assertion is an overreaction to a problem that's
hard to create to begin with. *If* a set of canti brake levers could
be found which lacked adjusting barrels, the system could still be
adjusted (inconveniently) using the cable clamp. I would score this
as a troll in its venue.
--
Typoes are a feature, not a bug.
Some gardening required to reply via email.
Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.
Ads
 

Home - Home - Home - Home - Home