On Tue, 19 May 2015 17:01:29 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Tue, 19 May 2015 10:08:46 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 15:57:47 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 10:01:04 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 23:54:20 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 10:46:23 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sat, 16 May 2015 22:45:06 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:21:08 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:17 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

Nobody would say a saddle is more comfortable than a chair, or
we'd have them in our houses.

Bull****.
I only need to find one person who says a saddle is more
comfortable then a chair to prove you are a liar.

You need to find one person who sits on one instead of an armchair
in their living room. Even then, you may find the odd freak on a
BDSM site. You need to find a handful at least.

Overpopulated. Verging on prison cell. A cyclists, who enjoys
fresh air and countryside, should appreciate this.

So bicycling is great?

Not in cities.

You are entitled to your opinion.

A city is an eyesore. There is no fresh air and no scenery. The
inside of your car looks better.

What car?

Any car beats a city.

Not relevant in my case.

You're the one talking about cities and bicycles.

Cities and bicycles are not mutually incompatible.
So your statements are irrelevant.