On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 06:18:11 +0000, Tom Crispin
wrote:

On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:55:43 +0000,
wrote:

On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:31:17 +0000, Tom Crispin
wrote:

On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:21:21 +0000,
wrote:

A grandmother suffered broken bones and a bloody face after she was
hit by a cyclist riding on the pavement.

Perhaps she should have worn a helmet. As has been claimed
repeatedly, helmets protect against head and upper facial injury.


Ho,ho, ho - very funny

Perhaps now you know why everyone laughs at your continued diatribe.


Oh - really - I thought I was in everyone's kill-file.

If I'm not feel free to point out any errors I make in my posts


- mind it may become true as more and more
****wit cyclists think it is OK to ride on pavements/run in to
pedestrians.

PS - You never did explain why you published the names and addresses
of the restaurants owned by the Vietnamese guy who hit the cyclist?

Yes I did. Use Google.


Funny I must have missed it at the time - and now perhaps Google have
taken it out of the archive because I still can't find it

You wouldn't happen to have a bit more information such as date of
posting and subject would you?