Bill Sornson wrote:
Espressopithecus (Java Man) wrote:
In article .com,
says...

Espressopithecus (Java Man) wrote:
In article .com,
says...
Follow the thread whilst they conspire to "stuff the ballot box"
and distort the vox populi:

http://tinyurl.com/k5nf4

....and remember, there's no such thing as an AHZ ;-)

Opposing a MHL doesn't make one an "AHZ. The data available doesn't
support MHLs as worthwhile safety legislation.



Do you support the notion of conspiring to distort the vote by
nefarious means?

It's an unscientific on-line poll, not a "vote". I don't care who
does what to it.

Agreed...but it is rather funny/sad that they'd go to such lengths to affect
the outcome (or /effect/ their desired one).



And, IMO, is proof of the existance of UK AHZs. Who but a zealot would
expend such energy on a rather trivial subject?