On 11/07/2019 18:31, Simon Jester wrote:
On Thursday, July 11, 2019 at 5:43:29 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 11/07/2019 16:13, TMS320 wrote:
On 11/07/2019 15:45, JNugent wrote:
On 11/07/2019 14:41, Simon Jester wrote:

You introduced pedestrian zones on motorways.

You don't even understand what you are saying.

It's easy enough to understand. The failure is yours.

Now there's a surprise. Bzzzzzz.

The report was of a cyclist cycling on a motorway. Desperate Jester
tries to justify their dangerous law-breaking by referring to drivers in
"pedestrian zones", which can only be of relevance if these pedestrian
zones are on motorways.

Where did I try to justify their actions?

In a post on this newsgroup.

If they aren't, there can be no equivalance between the offence
committed by that cyclist and the imaginary drivers in Desperate
Jester's mind.

Apparently I'm 'not right in the head'.

You've already agreed that.

A claim you have made yet refuse to provide any evidence to support it.

Not necessary. You've already agreed it.


That's all.

Folks!