On 12/07/2019 14:30, Simon Jester wrote:
On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 11:45:39 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 12/07/2019 03:15, Simon Jester wrote:

Where did I try to justify their actions?

In a post on this newsgroup.

Then you should have no trouble citing the actual text.

That's true. And neither would you, if you seriously disputed what was
said. But you don't, because you know it's true.

So why haven't you cited the text?

There is no need to. It isn't in dispute.

If they aren't, there can be no equivalance between the offence
committed by that cyclist and the imaginary drivers in Desperate
Jester's mind.

Apparently I'm 'not right in the head'.

You've already agreed that.

Without a definition I cannot agree or disagree.

That didn't stop you.

Once again you fail to provide a definition of 'not right in the head'.

There is no need to. It isn't in dispute. You have already accepted that
it is a description of your good self.

Until you do so there is no point in continuing this discussion.

Thou speakest aright, particularly because there is nothing in dispute.