On Wednesday, July 17, 2019 at 4:08:29 PM UTC-4, Tom Kunich wrote:

For a theory to be scientific it must have several factors involved:

1. Be testable and falsifiable ( You must be able to imagine some evidence or data that could prove your theory wrong.)
2. Explain natural phenomena
3. Be useful for making predictions
4. Not be absolute (theories are changeable if new data or observations are found)

Explain to everyone here how evolution meets 1. and 3.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._col...ion_experiment
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3705945/

Both Lenski and Kishony have testable, falsifiable, and verifiable published experiments showing the predictable evolution of microorganisms.

Then explain why you do not understand 4.

Where do you get the idea he doesn't? Besides that, a 'theory' does have to be mutable, but evolution is well past the mutable stage - like gravity. In effect, no longer a theory, but a law of nature. Your 'god-of-the-gaps' grows weaker by the minute.