On 05/07/2020 18:30, Mike Collins wrote:

On Sunday, 5 July 2020 16:39:13 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 05/07/2020 16:25, Mike Collins wrote:
On Sunday, 5 July 2020 14:37:11 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 05/07/2020 07:59, Mike Collins wrote:
On Sunday, 5 July 2020 00:23:38 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 04/07/2020 10:32, Simon Mason wrote:

There seems too be a lot of careless road crossers out there.

GET OFF YOUR MOBILES!
QUOTE:
An elderly man is fighting for his life after being knocked down by a cyclist.

Police were called to Bow Road in Tower Hamlets to reports of a collision involving a cyclist and a pedestrian. The man, aged in his 70s, was treated by paramedics at the scene before being taken to hospital.

Officers from Met Police are now attempting to contact members of his family.

The cyclist did not stop at the scene, near to Thames Magistrates Court, following the collision at just after 5pm on Friday.

Police confirmed detectives are investigating and said the man was critically ill in hospital.

A spokesman said: "The pedestrian was treated by London Ambulance Service at the scene before being taken to hospital. "Police are attempting to inform next of kin.

"The rider of the bicycle did not stop at the scene. Enquiries to locate this person are ongoing."

Officers from the Serious Collision Investigation Unit are asking any witnesses, or those with dash cam footage, to call 208 597 4874, or 101 with the reference number CAD 5779/3 July.

https://www.mylondon.news/news/east-...pital-18540318

Blaming the pedestrian victim... a typical arrogant cyclist failing.

Assuming the cyclist was at fault, a typical Nugent failing.

Which bit of...

"The rider of the bicycle did not stop at the scene. Enquiries to locate
this person are ongoing"

...did you fail to comprehend?

Has the cyclist yet come forward in the public-sprited way you imagine
cyclists all behave?

A "Yes" or "No" will suffice.

But no... you prefer to blame the septuagenarian victim.

Which part of...

Assuming the cyclist was at fault, a typical Nugent failing

I assume nothing.

So you agree there is no evidence the pedestrian was the victim. I assume you will be retracting your previous post.

You reckon the absconding cyclist was the victim and the
critically-injured elderly and vulnerable gentleman fighting for his
life in hospital was the aggressor? Is that it?

So why hasn't the cyclist come forward to say so?

As I had already asked you, hass the cyclist yet come forward in the
public-sprited way you imagine cyclists all behave?

A "Yes" or "No" will suffice - and will tell us all we need to know.