In article ,
Bill C wrote:

On Mar 5, 12:51*pm, "
wrote:

Jeez, JT, I'm working on it, okay? *People are
so impatient, they want change in an instant.
I have a day job, because ol' Barack was too nice
to make Secretary of Revenge a cabinet level position.
And it's not easy to compile a national list of
up-against-the-wall-mother****ers on evenings
and weekends while still keeping up a Fat Master
training schedule.

"As some day it may happen that a victim must be found,
* * *I've got a little list--I've got a little list
Of society offenders who might well be underground,
* * *And who never would be missed--who never would be missed!"

-Ko-Ko Ben

Actually Ben
From the reaction of the left wingnuts to Obama so far we were
expecting the same guy to show up in the WH. They're ****ed because he
hasn't been one of them so far, and I'm pleasantly surprised.
http://tinyurl.com/6a9yr2

You actually think that an appointee of Obama's that Rove and Limbaugh agree with
shows he's "in the center?" Sorry, those two are as extemist as can be.

You're "pleasantly surprised" that you think "the left" is getting screwed.
Surprise.

http://tinyurl.com/9o33ut

Wow, a NewsMax article that says Obama is ****ing "the left" off by not being as
extreme as you (and they) claimed he'd be. You don't see a logical weakness there?

Seems like we were both wrong so far. You can do any number of
searches around "Obama Revolt left angry" and other words and come up
with plenty of stuff. I expected what they expected.

Well, with a search term set that loaded, you shouldn't be very surprised at what
comes up. In lawyer talk, that would be considered "leading the witness." Anyway, if
you look at the list of hits, all of the first ones are from right leaning sites.
Which shouldn't be all that surprising.

--
tanx,
Howard

Caught playing safe
It's a bored game

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?