wrote in message
...

1. The Burnham study in question had been commissioned in the Fall of
2005 by MIT, using MIT's own internal funding.

I suggest you don't have any clue what the hell you're talking about. Soros
needed only say that he would donate money later to start such a study. But
that sure wouldn't stop you from claiming otherwise.

2. The FoxNews story is incorrect about the estimate itself. The WHO/
MoH study did not estimate that 151,000 people had died since the
invasion in 2003; it estimated that 151,000 people had died of violent
causes since the invasion in 2003. The overall all-cause estimate of
"excess" mortality from the WHO study was 400,000, which was within
the error margin of Burnham's estimate of 650,000.

Here's a clue you nitwit - such a "study" that proclaims "excess deaths" is
a complete and utter fraud. Entire tribes were being wiped out in secret by
Hussein's regime and lousy left wing cowards such as yourself would gladly
claim otherwise despite huge projects such as the swap draining and
testimoney from the swamp arabs that they were being murdered en masse.

Tell me you spineless coward - what were the excess deaths from the American
Revolution - or the Indian Wars? You seem to think that freedom isn't worth
"excess deaths" so perhaps you ought to return to China and live out your
life of luxury there.