On 06/10/2010 09:28, Squashme wrote:
On 6 Oct, 08:30, wrote:
the taxi drivers witness was out of the country, but the cyclist's witnesses
turned up, the taxi driver (on his own) was not found to be credible.

http://road.cc/content/news/25146-lo...led-taxi-drive...

The report in the standard has a slightly different slanthttp://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23884814-cyclist-is-cl...

the comments after it are telling: people are p@@@d off with cyclists in
London.

And you treated the earlier request for witnesses thus:-

"I believe this is one of those attempts to see what memories can be
triggered of a non existent event."

Is there anything to suggest that that was wrong?