On 10/09/2013 12:39, Mentalguy2k8 wrote:

"brianrob1961" wrote in message
...

There obviously isn't even the slightest appetite for taking this group
back from the trolls, as people continue to engage with them as ever.
That's fine. It was worth a try though.

...said the #2 troll of the site.

Good to see that you still rate yourself as #1.

If the very mild ****taking (although not from me) in the thread of your
original question really got under your skin (no pun intended) then
perhaps a "site" [sic] like this one really isn't your cup of tea. Since
you don't appear to have the skills required to use a killfile, I really
don't know why you don't use URCM instead, it's ideal for people who
like to denigrate motorists, campaign for limitless funding for cycling,
agree tht the Highway Code is for motorists and not cyclists, and all
this incredible fun without the heartache of having a contrary point of
view suddenly appear in a thread. And it's made up of joyless people
without a sense of humour so there won't even be any gentle ribbing,
never mind the distressing and offensive remarks like "give up cycling"
in response to a question about a problem. You'll have to tone down the
language and the trolling though, you'll get banned.

Once a ****, always a ****, huh?

My killfile works fine, thanks.

1) I don't like to denigrate motorists. I like to denigrate bad and
selfish motorists.

2) I don't believe in unlimited funding for cycling. I do believe in
more funding for cycling and considerably less spending on roads, with
large increases in road tax and eye watering fines for things like
speeding and using a mobile phone while driving (in fact the phone one
should be an automatic 12 month ban).

3) Moderated groups are usually run by joyless people without a sense of
humour. That is why I don't join them.

4) I agree tht (sic) the Highway Code is for all road users. Show me a
average motorist that obeys it to the letter and I will pay £500 to a
charity of your choice.

5) You are still a ****.