On 21/09/2013 11:27, Catrap wrote:


"brianrob1961" wrote in message
...

On 18/09/2013 08:24, jnugent wrote:
On 18/09/2013 00:19, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 00:02:27 -0700, jnugent
wrote:

On 17/09/2013 23:49, Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:17:04 -0700, jnugent
wrote:

After all, cyclists and London bus drivers have no peers when it
comes
to quantity of traffic offences per 100km travelled.

Can you qualify that statement?

A link to the number of convictions per 100km by mode would suffice.

Why?

Are you unable to trust your own eyes?

I assume from your evasion of my request that you cannot back up your
statement. Is my assumption correct?

Your request is not relevant to my statement and neither would an answer
to it be probative.



Ha ha ha ha ha ha. What a tit and what a cop out. You are almost as much
of a brain dead ****wit as the Mentalguy who sees coaches speeding
around at over 70 mph and then has to backtrack and start using words
like 'anecdotal'.

So let's get this right: despite the fact that their are millions more
cars than there are cyclists, despite the fact that government has to
run a vast machine just to police the behaviour of motorists, and
despite the fact that UK charity Road Peace (http://www.roadpeace.org)
estimates that as of this morning nearly 895 thousand people have been
killed on roads worldwide (a minute fraction of which might have been
caused by cyclists), you think - actually you fantasise - that cyclists
and London (why just London?) bus drivers commit more traffic offences
than car drivers! lol

Yet another off topic, insulting and foul languaged post from the moron
who wants to "take back the group "

Off topic?!?!?!? If road deaths and a post that mentions cyclists
several times is off topic to you then you really are beyond help lol