On Tuesday, June 18, 2019 at 4:29:36 AM UTC-4, news18 wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 12:42:00 -0500, AMuzi wrote:


What's needed then is a program to make the glaciers play along with
someone's pet theory:

https://www.reviewjournal.com/opinio...rial-glaciers-
didnt-melt-fast-enough-to-meet-prediction-1688833/

Naah, that is just the usual "don't look there (poles melting), look over
here where this glacier, one, has grown. Except, it is all about there
being massively more energy in the environment and both high and low
temeperatures, aka the extremes will occurr in increasing frequency.


Typical denier obfuscations and distractions - cherry picking old long-refuted data and mis-characterizing scientists who actually work in the field of climate science. Of course, these people are the same ones who believe trump when he says he's smarter than all the generals:

https://www.militarytimes.com/news/y...hange-threats/