Thread: never undertake
View Single Post
  #7  
Old July 17th 13, 10:13 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Mrcheerful[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,662
Default never undertake

Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:34:08 +0100, "Mrcheerful"
wrote:

Bertie Wooster wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 08:36:24 +0100, "Mrcheerful"
wrote:

This could have been avoided totally if the cyclist had not gone up
the inside. Drivers just do not realise how stupid cyclists can
be.

http://road.cc/content/news/12315-dr...-lorrys-wheels

Can you quote the part of that report which states the cyclist was
undertaking or had undertaken the truck?

Failing that, can you quote the part of that report which suggests
the cyclist was undertaking or had undertaken the truck?


Yes:
"The driver was in the cycle box so we couldn't get in front"
therefore the cyclists came up the inside.


That suggests nothing of the sort.

It suggests this:
The cyclists were in the cycle box when the truck pulled alongside by
going into the cycle box. The cyclists could not get ahead of the
truck because that would mean going leaving the cycle box.


only in the mind of a psycholist.


Ads
 

Home - Home - Home - Home - Home