On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:29:16 +0100, John Hearns
wrote:

Tony Raven wrote:

It's a common misconception that a disabled person has to show physical
signs to be disabled (and be too poor to own a relatively expensive
car). He may or may not have been disabled but it is a shame the mob
made their usual presumptions.

Indeed. But this git deserved all he got.

Sorry, but how can you know?

It would be nice to think it was an able bodied person snaffling a
disabled bay but as Tony points out, you just can't tell.

If he had, for example, heart failure, he would look fine until he
exerted himself enough to bring on symptoms.