View Single Post
  #26  
Old September 4th 15, 11:36 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
David Lang
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,816
Default David Lang can't answer his own questions.

On 04/09/2015 22:53, TMS320 wrote:
"David Lang" wrote in message
On 04/09/2015 21:17, TMS320 wrote:
"David Lang" wrote
On 04/09/2015 08:39, TMS320 wrote:
"David Lang" wrote in message

You seriously doubt that The Highway Code, RoSPA, The BMA, The NHS,
the
Police, the IAM, A&E consultants, the Ambulance Service, TFL &
Sustrans
are not knowledgeable on the subject of road safety and head trauma??

My question was "Who says they are knowledgeable on this subject?" (The
subject being effectiveness of cycle helmets, not the business of
mopping
up after a crash.) It seems that your only answer is that you say so.

That confirms it. You are retarded.

Actually, looking at your question again -
"You seriously doubt that ...are not knowledgeable...?"

What was the right answer you had in your head before you moved your
fingers
to type the question?

That these august bodies, respected throughout the world, with vast
experience are highly knowledgeable about accidents, safety and head
trauma.


That isn't it. You typed a question and you were expecting an
answer yes or no. Which was it? Come on, you complain when others don't
answer.


Try that again in English. I did ask a question and I didn't get an answer.

Do you have a point?

For example London Ambulance Service attend 80 RTCs a day. Do you
seriously believe they have no knowledge of head trauma and its
prevention?


I seriously believe they are highly skilled medical technicians and in
transporting patients to hospital. That is their remit. If they spend time
researching cause and prevention of injury, they are going outside this
remit and misusing taxpayer money.


The Ambulance Service spend a lot of time doing research like this. It
makes them more efficient.


If they are doing such research, and
giving opinions based on it, then this research should be available. If
their opinions are not based on proper research, they are worthless.


It is available. But not to moronic cyclists.

Insulting someone for not agreeing with the wording of your text will not
change the matter.


When I describe you as a retard it isn't an insult, it's a factual
description.

RoSPA have 54 peer reviewed research papers on their website...


...which you haven't read.


I have - you haven't.



Ads
 

Home - Home - Home - Home - Home