On 15/11/2019 08:42, TMS320 wrote:
On 15/11/2019 01:54, JNugent wrote:
On 14/11/2019 22:08, TMS320 wrote:
On 14/11/2019 10:27, JNugent wrote:
On 14/11/2019 09:40, TMS320 wrote:
On 14/11/2019 00:22, JNugent wrote:

Was/is he a cyclist?

Not relevant to circumstances.

Are you saying that describing a wanted violent criminal is not the
right thing to do?

Only in your fevered imagination.

I never thought you would say it wasn't the right thing to do. I asked
you so that you would have to deny it or confirm by silence.

I only replied to say a story about a mugging is irrelevant to a group
about cycling. Your question is also irrelevant; you should put it to a
law and order group.

The description was given in a newspaper and on its website.

There was a clue in the story as written (you have chosen to excise the
link).

Very obviously I have no more information.

Then you agree that the bicycle is nothing more than an aid to
identification.

Isn't that what I said?

You did. Only incidental to insisting that a mugging has some relevance
to a cycling group.

So when are you going to intervene in Mason's posts about motoring offences?