On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 21:22:23 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
wrote:

On Friday, March 27, 2020 at 8:04:00 PM UTC-7, Sir Ridesalot wrote:
On Friday, 27 March 2020 21:09:46 UTC-4, John B. wrote:
On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 14:41:09 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
wrote:

On Friday, March 27, 2020 at 2:41:24 AM UTC-7, sms wrote:
On 3/27/2020 1:58 AM, Rolf Mantel wrote:
Am 27.03.2020 um 00:47 schrieb Tom Kunich:

Covid-19 is an RNA virus that is easy to kill on just about any
surface with any common household cleaner. Are you trying to impress
me with your knowledge that there are DNA viruses? Many ssDNA viruses
multiply via RNA duplication so who the hell cares?

The latest research is that the Covid-19 is a stable virus so it is
in all likelihood a one shot wonder. It is NOT dangerous to people
under 60 without underlying health problems so why is the world
shutting down for it?

Can you please stop that lying Spiel that CIVOD-19 is not dangerous for
the under-60's at a time where you find 25-year olds on the respirator
in lots of Italian hospitals?

Not just in Italy.
https://www.propublica.org/article/a-medical-worker-describes--terrifying-lung-failure-from-covid19-even-in-his-young-patients

I suspect that the Kunich feels compelled to repeat the lies of his
handlers in the Trump administration.

And I suspect that you're trying to convince everyone of your political fidelity.

Lets see... A guy warns that the COVID-19 virus attacks even young
patients and Tommy, who asserts that he is an expert in the subject
replies disdaining the poster's "political fidelity"???

The real question would seem to be, "Is Tom rational?"
--
cheers,

John B.

The answer to that question is definitely not!

Cheers

It is a terrible thing to be peeing in your pants for fear of anything and everything: "Doctors around the world have been quick to analyse just who has been suffering the most serious coronavirus complications.
While most people only developed mild symptoms, researchers found have that those most at risk of dying are over the age of 70, or those who have pre-existing serious health conditions like heart disease, diabetes, high blood pressure or cancer.
Professor Robert Booy from the National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance told the ABC that Australia needed to focus on older people living in aged care and the elderly still living at home, as they were most at risk."

https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/he...93303eff7e1985

But then you seem the type to pee your pants anyway.

I see.... peeing in the pants equates to your statement above, "I
suspect that you're trying to convince everyone of your political
fidelity", in what manner?

Is peeing some sort of synonym for "fidelity"? Or may the secret word
is "pants". "Fidelity pants"? Would one say "I fidelityed in my
pants"? Or perhaps "I pee in my fidelitys".

Or should we just assume that, as usual, since you don't know what you
are talking about you just tell lies.
--
cheers,

John B.