View Single Post
August 16th 18, 09:02 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
John B. Slocomb
external usenet poster
On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 23:18:27 -0700 (PDT),
On Thursday, August 16, 2018 at 2:16:32 AM UTC+2, AMuzi wrote:
On 8/15/2018 6:02 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 8/15/2018 1:39 PM,
On Wednesday, August 15, 2018 at 12:26:14 AM UTC-7, news18
On 14/08/18 08:48,
Obviously you like carrying around two tubes, a patch
kit, two CO2 cartridges and a filler and a mini-pump
because it seems romantic to you.
Speaking of weight, just how heavier are these tubeless
to the old tyre and tube system.
You are perfectly free to feel that the same technology
used on every other rubber tired vehicle in the world is
not suited to bicycles but if you're going to argue,
don't use inadequate responses like "lock you in to
or "testing procedures are only for very narrow test
conditions." when this isn't the case at all. It is far
easier to test bicycle tire performance than those of a
How many of these "every other rubber tyred vehcicles"
are not driven by
an ICE or similar power plant. P.S. you can leave out
Why are you arguing this? Tubeless tires are missing the
weight of a tube. What's more, because the sealant is so
reliable you can use lighter racing-style tires rather
than armored tires such as the Gatorskins or the others of
similar construction. The flat tests I presented earlier
was a guy riding Continental 4000's - a racing tire that
has minimal rolling resistance in the tests.
I don't understand what you want us to do, Tom. I've got six
personal bikes plus a tandem. Oh, plus another 1930s antique
stored in the garage attic. They have five different wheel
sizes. Surely you don't want me to run out and convert them
all to tubeless?
I have no current plans to buy another bike. If I start down
that path, I might look at the issue. But I'm not seeing a
Right now, my main issue is learning how to repair them if
there is a problem, because I do get recruited to help fix
bike problems. I'm not looking forward to dealing with the
If it were possible to make a proper tubeless bcycle tire
with out goop, we'd all ride them.
Open every day since 1 April, 1971
Right. Goop is the reason I not even consider tubeless. Up to the last tire test in TOUR magazine the best tubeless tires had a higher RR compared to the best clincher tires. Now they are on par. They are a bit heavier and harder to mount. That would be all manageable for me but dealing with the goop not.
But from reading posts here it seemed like the anti-flat goop was main
argument for using tubeless.
John B. Slocomb
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by John B. Slocomb
Find all threads started by John B. Slocomb