|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
John Forester Speaks
On Thursday, October 3, 2019 at 8:00:32 AM UTC-7, Joerg wrote:
On 2019-10-01 16:46, Tom Kunich wrote: On Tuesday, October 1, 2019 at 4:39:22 PM UTC-7, jbeattie wrote: This was forwarded to me by one of my bike commuter cohorts: -- Jay Beattie. Pretty much the entire commuter bicycle movement is built around John as a starting point. ... I disagree with many of the things John Forester advocates. In this interview he clearly dodged a key point: Quote, "[Interviewer] ... I'm not a transportation policy person but I would guess that there's data now to demonstrate that on avenues where protected infrastructure has gone in that incidents with serious injury or death have gone down since that infrastructure go put in. So I feel like I see evidence in the US that in some places at least where it's practical, that protected infrastructure can make a difference and vastly increase the number of people who feel safer riding a bike. JF: Your statement is full of false assumptions." ... and then he veered off the topic above. Which "false assumptions"? The interviewer was correct, the vast majority of cyclists prefers cycling infrastructure. On other things I agree with John Forester. For example, I always leave bike lanes when I want to do a left turn, lining up with cars in the turn lane. And sometimes getting grumpy when the traffic engineers were too incompetent to make the loop for the light detect my bike. ... Though all of these bike lanes and bike trails ideas COME FROM BICYCLISTS. But they don't. Most infrastructure design is the product of national planning organizations like NACTO or state DOTs or local planning departments. Some of it is from private enterprise like Alta Planning + Design. Many of these grand designs would never come from cyclists except perhaps those with suicidal ideations. Exactly. And they know. A lot of the planners don't know and you end up with facilities that are a nightmare. ... And I have to admit, after battling h4qvy traffic getting on a nice quiet bike path has a remarkable calming effect. I know only one cyclist who doesn't care much whether he rides in the lane or on a bike path, though even he is mostly found on long segregated bike paths. All others prefer, like myself, good quality bike paths. Even the serious commuters do who easily spend 50mi/day on their bikes. What many do is a split commute. They truck their bikes to parking lots near the American River Bike Path an then continue the commute by bicycle. In the evening all in reverse. Linear parks are fine if you want to avoid traffic, but then again, you get hung up behind walkers with dog packs, homeless, etc., etc. Many times the added infrastructure is inferior to the prior road arrangement, which around here, may have included a bike lane or wide shoulder, e.g. https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2440/3...340bfe29_c.jpg The segregated MUP is now bisected by intersecting roads every 25-50 yards. The prior bike lane allowed you to ride without interruption down the main road. Danger is now increased because cyclists hit the intersections at the same time as entering traffic. It's the functional equivalent of putting bikes on sidewalks. Gee, thanks for that improvement. Now I get to stop every 25 yards. There are many illustrations of foolish choices around here -- and some good choices, which are typically just wide shoulders and/or bike lanes. -- Jay Beattie. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Email to J. Forester | James[_8_] | Techniques | 4 | October 24th 13 01:40 AM |
Forester says... | Tm Shermn _[_2_] | General | 184 | February 9th 11 05:01 PM |
Forester says... | Tm Shermn _[_2_] | Techniques | 181 | February 9th 11 05:01 PM |
J.Forester How to Brake | nash | General | 0 | March 11th 07 06:17 PM |
John Forester's 1955 Viking "Tour of Britain" | Lars Lehtonen | General | 2 | May 23rd 06 07:44 PM |