another pedestrian injured by a cyclist

I understood from Doug that cyclists never hurt anyone due to their low
speed, low momentum and the skill of their riders?

http://www.dorsetecho.co.uk/news/835...dwe ll_Trail/

On Aug 26, 1:24*pm, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
I understood from Doug that cyclists never hurt anyone due to their low
speed, low momentum and the skill of their riders?

http://www.dorsetecho.co.uk/news/835...st__scalps__bo...

Yes but this incident takes no account of the damage a motorist could
do to a cyclist.

On 26 Aug, 13:24, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
I understood from Doug that cyclists never hurt anyone due to their low
speed, low momentum and the skill of their riders?

You understand wrongly as usual. The point I keep on making is that
cars are much, much more dangerous than cycles and yet the law wrongly
treats cyclists as if they are just as dangerous as motorists.

http://www.dorsetecho.co.uk/news/835...st__scalps__bo...

Please note, this is yet another new anti-cyclist thread from a
motorist on this cycling newsgroup, which clearly proves I do not
provoke their existence with my anti-motorist threads and of which I
stand accused. That said I will wait a little longer to clear up any
doubts on the matter.

I trust also that any new thread of mine which refers to motorists
will not be regarded as OT because of the serious threat which
motorists present to cyclists and which are not reciprocated by
cyclists.

-- .
UK Radical Campaigns.
http://www.zing.icom43.net
A driving licence is a licence to kill.

wrote:
On Aug 26, 1:24 pm, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
I understood from Doug that cyclists never hurt anyone due to their
low speed, low momentum and the skill of their riders?

http://www.dorsetecho.co.uk/news/835...st__scalps__bo...

Yes but this incident takes no account of the damage a motorist could
do to a cyclist.

Which is of course completely irelevant.

Typical cyclist tactic.


--
Dave - intelligent enough to realise that a push bike, like a skateboard,
is a kid's toy, not a viable form of transport.

The Medway Handyman wrote:
wrote:
On Aug 26, 1:24 pm, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
I understood from Doug that cyclists never hurt anyone due to their
low speed, low momentum and the skill of their riders?

http://www.dorsetecho.co.uk/news/835...st__scalps__bo...
Yes but this incident takes no account of the damage a motorist could
do to a cyclist.

Which is of course completely irelevant.

Typical cyclist tactic.


Whoosh!!!

--
Tony Dragon

On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:18:45 -0700 (PDT), Doug
wrote:

snip

That said I will wait a little longer to clear up any
doubts on the matter.


Please don't.

Just **** off now.


--
Latest accident figures from DfT Q1 2010
Killed or Seriously Injured:

Pedestrians DOWN 8%
Car Users DOWN 8%
Motorcycle users DOWN 8%
Cyclists UP : 4%

Spot a theme?

"Mrcheerful" wrote in message
news:z2tdo.45595$GZ7.245@hurricane...
I understood from Doug that cyclists never hurt anyone due to their low
speed, low momentum and the skill of their riders?

Then you're even stupider than Doug

Tony Dragon wrote:
The Medway Handyman wrote:
wrote:
On Aug 26, 1:24 pm, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
I understood from Doug that cyclists never hurt anyone due to their
low speed, low momentum and the skill of their riders?

http://www.dorsetecho.co.uk/news/835...st__scalps__bo...
Yes but this incident takes no account of the damage a motorist
could do to a cyclist.

Which is of course completely irelevant.

Typical cyclist tactic.


Whoosh!!!

Whoosh?



--
Dave - intelligent enough to realise that a push bike, like a skateboard, is
a kid's toy, not a viable form of transport.

Doug wrote:
On 26 Aug, 13:24, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
I understood from Doug that cyclists never hurt anyone due to their
low speed, low momentum and the skill of their riders?

You understand wrongly as usual. The point I keep on making is that
cars are much, much more dangerous than cycles and yet the law wrongly
treats cyclists as if they are just as dangerous as motorists.

http://www.dorsetecho.co.uk/news/835...st__scalps__bo...

Please note, this is yet another new anti-cyclist thread from a
motorist on this cycling newsgroup, which clearly proves I do not
provoke their existence with my anti-motorist threads and of which I
stand accused. That said I will wait a little longer to clear up any
doubts on the matter.

I trust also that any new thread of mine which refers to motorists
will not be regarded as OT because of the serious threat which
motorists present to cyclists and which are not reciprocated by
cyclists.

1 fatality in 2,608,695,652 miles driven isn't a serious threat.


--
Dave - intelligent enough to realise that a push bike, like a skateboard, is
a kid's toy, not a viable form of transport.

On Aug 26, 9:15*pm, "The Medway Handyman" davidl...@no-spam-
blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
Tony Dragon wrote:
The Medway Handyman wrote:
wrote:
On Aug 26, 1:24 pm, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
I understood from Doug that cyclists never hurt anyone due to their
low speed, low momentum and the skill of their riders?

http://www.dorsetecho.co.uk/news/835...st__scalps__bo....
Yes but this incident takes no account of the damage a motorist
could do to a cyclist.

Which is of course completely irelevant.

Typical cyclist tactic.

Whoosh!!!

Whoosh?

--
Dave - intelligent enough to realise that a push bike, like a skateboard, is
a kid's toy, not a viable form of transport.

Iron on me. iron on me