|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Are you interested?
|
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Are you interested?
no, not really.
nate |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Are you interested?
N8N writes:
no, not really. nate Replying to Spam is spamming itself. Please do not do it. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Are you interested?
Simon Lewis wrote:
N8N writes: no, not really. nate Replying to Spam is spamming itself. Please do not do it. He removed the link and made a joke out of the Subject's wording. Not spamming (any more than you did, too). BS |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Are you interested?
"Bill Sornson" writes:
Simon Lewis wrote: N8N writes: no, not really. nate Replying to Spam is spamming itself. Please do not do it. He removed the link and made a joke out of the Subject's wording. Not spamming (any more than you did, too). BS Wrong. He re-opened the thread. Some of us have such stuff correctly filtered. Seriously : replying to spam re-ignites the thread. Because he is not killfiled his reply awoke the thread. There is no need, it was no joke and the spammer never reads the replies. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Are you interested?
Simon Lewis wrote:
"Bill Sornson" writes: Simon Lewis wrote: N8N writes: no, not really. nate Replying to Spam is spamming itself. Please do not do it. He removed the link and made a joke out of the Subject's wording. Not spamming (any more than you did, too). BS Wrong. In your opinion. I disagree. He re-opened the thread. Some of us have such stuff correctly filtered. Seriously : replying to spam re-ignites the thread. Because he is not killfiled his reply awoke the thread. There is no need, it was no joke and the spammer never reads the replies. "Re-ignites the thread"? He posted a 3-word reply to a subject header ("Are You Interested?") and deleted the offending Spamlink. You have now /ignited/ the thread to at least four additional replies, when if you'd just ignored it then the thread would have expired in fewer days. Bill "there are more important issues to netcop than this little nothing" S. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Are you interested?
On Oct 29, 2:26*pm, "Bill Sornson" wrote:
Simon Lewis wrote: "Bill Sornson" writes: Simon Lewis wrote: N8N writes: no, not really. nate Replying to Spam is spamming itself. Please do not do it. He removed the link and made a joke out of the Subject's wording. Not spamming (any more than you did, too). BS Wrong. In your opinion. *I disagree. He re-opened the thread. Some of us have such stuff correctly filtered. Seriously : replying to spam re-ignites the thread. Because he is not killfiled his reply awoke the thread. There is no need, it was no joke and the spammer never reads the replies. "Re-ignites the thread"? *He posted a 3-word reply to a subject header ("Are You Interested?") and deleted the offending Spamlink. *You have now /ignited/ the thread to at least four additional replies, when if you'd just ignored it then the thread would have expired in fewer days. Bill "there are more important issues to netcop than this little nothing" S. And even THOSE are pretty well meaningless, yet we KNOW you'll obsess over them. Pathetic, really. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
When I'll be interested again. | Crescentius Vespasianus | Racing | 2 | March 31st 09 06:25 AM |
Anybody interested in an old Schwinn? | Chris Z The Wheelman | Marketplace | 0 | June 9th 06 01:49 AM |
Is anybody interested??? | Dominic Sansom | Australia | 0 | April 6th 05 11:26 PM |
Anybody interested? | Tomek Li | UK | 6 | September 12th 04 04:52 PM |
Anyone interested? | David_Leavit | Unicycling | 2 | April 25th 04 03:35 PM |