Red means stop, including cyclists

On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 09:10:01 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

snip


**** off Hagfish.


Now now Justipoo's - there is no need to get personal.

How's the dogging these days?

A friend of a friend of mine went dogging to somewhere called Schiedam and met
someone called Justin Lewis. Was it you by any chance?

Why do you just watch?

Hallo Judith Hagfish, my dogging is as flourishing as your child abuse.

wrote in message
...

On Thursday, June 27, 2013 5:56:12 PM UTC+2, Judith wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 15:52:49 +0100, Simon Weissel


wrote:



On 26/06/2013 12:12, Mrcheerful wrote:

he began to cross the road in front of the oncoming car while the
pedestrian

crossing light was still on red. Last thing he did.



http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/new...clist_s_death/







I tend to think that it better to look before you cross rather than

relying on lights. This guy made an error in that respect, regardless of

the green/red man.





It is *not* regardless of the status of the red/green man.



The man was on red for the cyclist.



He ignored it.



He was killed.



He will not make that mistake again.



Others may do.
**** off Hagfish.

Psycholists SOP. Always revert to insults when losing an argument.

On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 01:51:02 +0100, Phil W Lee wrote:


As you well know (unless you're an idiot), every road in the UK could
have it's safety improved much more by the removal of motor vehicles
than by any other single act.


hello Anchor - I see its the early hours and you're still on the sauce.

Why not get off to bed and see your doctor tomorrow?

Judith

On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 01:10:07 +0100, Partac wrote:

wrote in message
...

On Thursday, June 27, 2013 5:56:12 PM UTC+2, Judith wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 15:52:49 +0100, Simon Weissel


wrote:



On 26/06/2013 12:12, Mrcheerful wrote:

he began to cross the road in front of the oncoming car while the
pedestrian

crossing light was still on red. Last thing he did.



http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/
news/10507218._Momentary_error_of_judgement__led_to_Dar lington_cyclist_s_death/







I tend to think that it better to look before you cross rather than

relying on lights. This guy made an error in that respect, regardless
of

the green/red man.





It is *not* regardless of the status of the red/green man.



The man was on red for the cyclist.



He ignored it.



He was killed.



He will not make that mistake again.



Others may do.
**** off Hagfish.

Psycholists SOP. Always revert to insults when losing an argument.

Pot. kettle. black.

On 28/06/2013 09:49, Peter Keller wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 01:10:07 +0100, Partac wrote:



Psycholists SOP. Always revert to insults when losing an argument.

Pot. kettle. black.

Carprat creates arguments in his own head and accuses others of losing
to them.

On 28/06/2013 01:51, Phil W Lee wrote:
"Mentalguy2k8" considered Thu, 27 Jun 2013
16:18:03 +0100 the perfect time to write:


"Phil W Lee" wrote in message
...

You could improve that crossing by preventing cyclists from using it, they
obviously don't have the intelligence to use it legally or safely. No need
to penalise the hundreds of thousands of cars and pedestrians who use it
without killing each other.

You could improve it's safety far more by preventing motor vehicles
from using it, just like every other road in the UK.

Motor vehicles have been prevented from using every other road in the UK?

As you well know (unless you're an idiot), every road in the UK could
have it's safety improved much more by the removal of motor vehicles
than by any other single act.

Is starvation a safe death?

On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 20:37:04 +0100, JNugent wrote:

On 28/06/2013 01:51, Phil W Lee wrote:
"Mentalguy2k8" considered Thu, 27 Jun 2013
16:18:03 +0100 the perfect time to write:


"Phil W Lee" wrote in message
...

You could improve that crossing by preventing cyclists from using it, they
obviously don't have the intelligence to use it legally or safely. No need
to penalise the hundreds of thousands of cars and pedestrians who use it
without killing each other.

You could improve it's safety far more by preventing motor vehicles
from using it, just like every other road in the UK.

Motor vehicles have been prevented from using every other road in the UK?

As you well know (unless you're an idiot), every road in the UK could
have it's safety improved much more by the removal of motor vehicles
than by any other single act.

Is starvation a safe death?


I don't know about safe: but I should it is a way of saving money for the
individual.

Peter Keller writes:

**** off Hagfish. Psycholists SOP. Always revert to insults when
losing an argument.

Pot. kettle. black.

Quite. And so soon after JMS was the first to identify herself as a
`psycholist'!

--
Mark