|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
On or Off topic, and why feed the trolls?
Hello all,
I have been a long time lurker of this group and I find that I can't keep quite any longer. It didn't take very long for me to put Mr. Dolan on my ignore list. I found most of his comments to be inflamitory and generally not condusive to to an open public forum like this. So I put him on my 'ignore' list. No more Mr. Dolan, my headache has been eliminated. He is still entitled to his opinion, I feel no need to flame him, but I would rather not read his discourse. BUT, it seems like a lot of people here are unable to stop feeding the trolls. So I end up reading most of Eds post because the people that are replying to him include his comments in their reply. My request to the group; If you do feel the need to continue reading and responding to Mr. Dolan's comments, could you please refrain from quoting him in your posts. In an attempt to get this forum back on topic and away from politics; I am still researching which 'bent I plan on buying, (Spring 2005 will be my purchase date) What Bike computer does everybody use, and what do you like/dislike about it? |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"John Smith" wrote in message ... Hello all, I have been a long time lurker of this group and I find that I can't keep quite any longer. It didn't take very long for me to put Mr. Dolan on my ignore list. I found most of his comments to be inflamitory and generally not condusive to to an open public forum like this. One man's opinion - and that is all it is. So I put him on my 'ignore' list. No more Mr. Dolan, my headache has been eliminated. He is still entitled to his opinion, I feel no need to flame him, but I would rather not read his discourse. Based on what he has said so far, the feeling is mutual, but I do not kill file anyone. That is the coward's way out. BUT, it seems like a lot of people here are unable to stop feeding the trolls. So I end up reading most of Eds post because the people that are replying to him include his comments in their reply. My request to the group; If you do feel the need to continue reading and responding to Mr. Dolan's comments, could you please refrain from quoting him in your posts. Now this asshole, John Smith, really begins to **** me off. He is a g.d. controller who would destroy proper newsgroup posting just so he doesn't have to ever see anything I have written. This goes to the point that I have made many times before about kill filers: they are not just cowards, but scoundrels into the bargain. A pox on them and may they rot in Hell. The only question I have for this supreme asshole who goes by the moniker of "John Smith" is how did you get to be such a namby-pamby? Were you born that way or did you have to work at it over the course of your miserable life. In an attempt to get this forum back on topic and away from politics; I am still researching which 'bent I plan on buying, (Spring 2005 will be my purchase date) What Bike computer does everybody use, and what do you like/dislike about it? What a ****ed up stupid question! This moron would be a hundred times better off reading me even when I am off topic than asking the dumbest question ever asked on this group about ****ing stupid bike computers. There are literally hundreds of bike computers on the market and one is about as good or bad as another. But I know there will be all kinds of helpful numskulls here who will be delighted to take on this most stupid question ever asked on ARBR. John Smith, put on the dunce cap and go sit in the corner of the room facing the wall for being the dumbest ****er who has yet posted to this group. That is no small accomplishment since you have had fierce competition for that honor over the years. -- Regards, Ed Dolan - Minnesota |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Why?
They need to be educated. Our resident troll needs a fresh, youthful view on life as his is old and crusty. He throws out his preposterous, old school comments in hopes of trading them in for new ones. While it's a hard pill for the troll to swallow he is still a keen learner. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Slugger" wrote in message ... Why? They need to be educated. Our resident troll needs a fresh, youthful view on life as his is old and crusty. He throws out his preposterous, old school comments in hopes of trading them in for new ones. While it's a hard pill for the troll to swallow he is still a keen learner. Slugger should think about doing nothing but emails instead of bothering the rest of us on Usenet. He not only top posts, a major sin in itself, but he does not even include a hint of anything at all of what he might be referring to. Therefore, no one knows what he is talking about except possibly himself. -- Regards, Ed Dolan - Minnesota |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I don't top post and the subject heading is enough information for a
response. I didn't include any of your post for a reason, dumbass. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Slugger" wrote in message ... I don't top post and the subject heading is enough information for a response. I didn't include any of your post for a reason, dumbass. You do nothing but top post and the subject heading is never enough to inform a reader of what the post is about. You are the dumbass, not me. But more importantly, you have no consideration for your readers. You are not worthy of Usenet. -- Regards, Ed Dolan - Minnesota |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
John Smith wrote in :
BUT, it seems like a lot of people here are unable to stop feeding the trolls. So I end up reading most of Eds post because the people that are replying to him include his comments in their reply. Have your newsreader filter on the References: header. I kill every article that has prairiewave.com in that header (or the From: header) and this newsgroup is so much more enjoyable. :-) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Have your newsreader filter on the References: header. I kill every
article that has prairiewave.com in that header (or the From: header) and this newsgroup is so much more enjoyable. :-) Cool. Looks like I'll have to try using xnews since Agent doesn't let me filter on that field. I am still researching which 'bent I plan on buying, (Spring 2005 will be my purchase date) What Bike computer does everybody use, and what do you like/dislike about it? I have a "Sigma Sport BC800. It is pretty basic but has the functions I use: trip odometer, total odometer, maximum speed and a clock. --mev, Mike Vermeulen |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Have your newsreader filter on the References: header. I kill every
article that has prairiewave.com in that header (or the From: header) and this newsgroup is so much more enjoyable. :-) Excellent advice, I will give that a try too. I have a "Sigma Sport BC800. It is pretty basic but has the functions I use: trip odometer, total odometer, maximum speed and a clock. --mev, Mike Vermeulen Thanks Mike, Does it also show your average speed over the last xx minutes? I have never used a computer, the last time I actually measured my biking speed was when I was in high school, and I had an analog speedometer. That was almost 15 years ago. I assume things have changed a little since then. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"John Smith" wrote in message ... Have your newsreader filter on the References: header. I kill every article that has prairiewave.com in that header (or the From: header) and this newsgroup is so much more enjoyable. :-) Excellent advice, I will give that a try too. I have a "Sigma Sport BC800. It is pretty basic but has the functions I use: trip odometer, total odometer, maximum speed and a clock. --mev, Mike Vermeulen Thanks Mike, Does it also show your average speed over the last xx minutes? I have never used a computer, the last time I actually measured my biking speed was when I was in high school, and I had an analog speedometer. That was almost 15 years ago. I assume things have changed a little since then. Quite a bit but I haven't seen anything that will show your average speed over the last few minutes, might be better to get a GPS for that |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|