|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Why Do You Ride Mountain A Bike On Streets?
"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message ... On Tue, 01 Jun 2004 16:18:38 GMT, "Pete" wrote: . .Gears. Most bikes sold today have multiple gears. 10, not 15 or 21. C'mon, Mikey...when was the last time you saw a *new* "10 speed" for sale? In any event...the number of gears is irrelevant. More gears = less spread between each one. Top and bottom are still pretty much the same. (Except for the so-called MegaRange rear cluster with an extra big low gear, found on many 'city bikes', as well as some mountain bikes) .Road/City/Hybrid/Comfort/MTB. Irrelevant. .Brakes. Most bikes sold today have two brakes. Irrelevant. .Frames. Stip a low end road bike, and a low end MTB down to the bare frame, .and I'd be surprised if you found more than a pound or so difference. Hardly .'overbuilt' If that were true, we wouldn't need mountain bikes. There must be some difference, or people would be mountain biking on 10-speeds. The difference is marketing. What is on display for people to see and buy? Things shaped like mountain bikes. Never mind that the vast majority never leave the pavement. Or at most go across the grass in the front yard. . .They *are* road tires, dumdum. They just happen to fit common mountain .bike . .rims. . . Implying that they are WIDER than normal road tires, and hence have more .rolling . resistance. DUH! . .Please show some data illustrating that point. I've posted data to the .opposite. Your turn. Something so obvious doesn't need "data". It is simple physics. Yes, it IS simple physics. Simple physics to show that the contact patch will, at a given pressure and weight, be the same size, no matter how wide the tire. Simple physics to show that a rounder and shorter contact patch, of the same area, causes less sidewall deformation, ergo less internal friction, ergo less rolling resistance. Not obvious, but simple. 100 pounds per square inch means exactly that. A 100 lb load results in a 1 square inch contact patch. Now....is that patch long and skinny, or wide and short? There is specific test data, from multiple sources, that show that wider tires (of the same construction and pressure) may well have less rolling resistance than narrower ones. I've posted links showing these tests. OTOH, as a counter, you can only say "It's obvious". No theory, no supporting data, no documented tests. Nothing. Just your usual frothing at the mouth. And as usual, completely wrong in your assumptions. Thanks for playing, Mikey. This has been fun. Pete I apologize to all those still reading this for my semi-annual "poking the monkey with a stick" exercise. I'll stop now. |
Ads |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Why Do You Ride Mountain A Bike On Streets?
On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 04:49:47 GMT, "Pete" wrote:
.. .."Mike Vandeman" wrote in message . .. .. On Tue, 01 Jun 2004 16:18:38 GMT, "Pete" wrote: .. .. . .. .Gears. Most bikes sold today have multiple gears. .. .. 10, not 15 or 21. .. ..C'mon, Mikey...when was the last time you saw a *new* "10 speed" for sale? ..In any event...the number of gears is irrelevant. Only if they are weightless. Idiot. More gears = less spread ..between each one. Top and bottom are still pretty much the same. (Except for ..the so-called MegaRange rear cluster with an extra big low gear, found on ..many 'city bikes', as well as some mountain bikes) .. .. .. .Road/City/Hybrid/Comfort/MTB. Irrelevant. .. .Brakes. Most bikes sold today have two brakes. Irrelevant. .. .Frames. Stip a low end road bike, and a low end MTB down to the bare ..frame, .. .and I'd be surprised if you found more than a pound or so difference. ..Hardly .. .'overbuilt' .. .. If that were true, we wouldn't need mountain bikes. There must be some .. difference, or people would be mountain biking on 10-speeds. .. ..The difference is marketing. Now you are just plain LYING. Mountain bikes are nothing like 10-speeds nor 3-speeds. What is on display for people to see and buy? ..Things shaped like mountain bikes. Never mind that the vast majority never ..leave the pavement. Or at most go across the grass in the front yard. .. .. . .They *are* road tires, dumdum. They just happen to fit common mountain .. .bike .. . .rims. .. . .. . Implying that they are WIDER than normal road tires, and hence have ..more .. .rolling .. . resistance. DUH! .. . .. .Please show some data illustrating that point. I've posted data to the .. .opposite. Your turn. .. .. Something so obvious doesn't need "data". It is simple physics. .. ..Yes, it IS simple physics. ..Simple physics to show that the contact patch will, at a given pressure and ..weight, be the same size, no matter how wide the tire. Nonsense. You are telling me that a 2" tire and a 1" tire both have the same width of road contact? You are just LYING. ..Simple physics to show that a rounder and shorter contact patch, of the same ..area, causes less sidewall deformation, ergo less internal friction, ergo ..less rolling resistance. .. ..Not obvious, but simple. .. ..100 pounds per square inch means exactly that. A 100 lb load results in a 1 ..square inch contact patch. Now....is that patch long and skinny, or wide and ..short? The area isn't the same. That's obvious. ..There is specific test data, from multiple sources, that show that wider ..tires (of the same construction and pressure) may well have less rolling ..resistance than narrower ones. I've posted links showing these tests. Nonsense. Narrow, high-pressure, smooth tires will always have less rolling resistance than wide, low-pressure, bumpy tires. ..OTOH, as a counter, you can only say "It's obvious". No theory, no ..supporting data, no documented tests. Nothing. Just your usual frothing at ..the mouth. And as usual, completely wrong in your assumptions. .. ..Thanks for playing, Mikey. This has been fun. .. .. ..Pete ..I apologize to all those still reading this for my semi-annual "poking the ..monkey with a stick" exercise. I'll stop now. .. === I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Why Do You Ride Mountain A Bike On Streets?
MV blathers:
Nonsense. You are telling me that a 2" tire and a 1" tire both have the same width of road contact? You are just LYING No - he's telling you that the AREA is the same, but the 2" tyre has a wider patch, which has been shown to have less rolling resistance. The area isn't the same. That's obvious. Only to someone with no scientific knowledge (which we knew to be the case here.) A quick physics lesson, Mikey. Pressure is measured in pounds per square inch (in American units). That means that, for a 100 psi tire, with a 100 lb weight on it, the contact patch will be 1 square inch. That's 100 psi. Whether the patch is 1" by 1" or 2" by 1/2" really doesn't matter, its area will always be 1 square inch. Period. If you double the pressure, the area of the patch will be half waht it was. If you double the weight, the patch doubles in area. It's simple math, which even you should be able to understand. Steve "shoulda been a teacher" |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Why Do You Ride Mountain A Bike On Streets?
"Pete" wrote (from the "a little knowledge is a
dangerous thing" file): Yes, it IS simple physics. Simple physics to show that the contact patch will, at a given pressure and weight, be the same size, no matter how wide the tire. Simple physics to show that a rounder and shorter contact patch, of the same area, causes less sidewall deformation, ergo less internal friction, ergo less rolling resistance. Except that nobody runs a mountain bike tire at 100 psi. And that's not even considering knobby treads. Are you seriously trying to argue that mountain bikes have lower rolling resistance than road bikes?? CC |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Why Do You Ride Mountain A Bike On Streets?
Mike Vandeman wrote in message . ..
-8- snip -8- Who cares? I like to enjoy biking, not torture myself and others. Now we *know* you're a liar - if you don't like to "torture myself and others" [sic], you'd have given up posting on a.m-b years ago. Adam... |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Why Do You Ride Mountain A Bike On Streets?
"Corvus Corvax" wrote in message
om... "Pete" wrote (from the "a little knowledge is a dangerous thing" file): Yes, it IS simple physics. Simple physics to show that the contact patch will, at a given pressure and weight, be the same size, no matter how wide the tire. Simple physics to show that a rounder and shorter contact patch, of the same area, causes less sidewall deformation, ergo less internal friction, ergo less rolling resistance. Except that nobody runs a mountain bike tire at 100 psi. And that's not even considering knobby treads. Are you seriously trying to argue that mountain bikes have lower rolling resistance than road bikes?? CC Probably not, but I'd be willing to bet my 26x1.5 Specialized Nimbus EX Armadillos have less rolling resistance at full pressure than the 26x1 3/8 crappies on Mikey's "english" --- International Bicycle 5326 E Independence Blvd Charlotte, NC 28212 http://intbike.com 704 535-5501 Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.692 / Virus Database: 453 - Release Date: 5/28/04 |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Why Do You Ride Mountain A Bike On Streets?
"Corvus Corvax" wrote in message om... "Pete" wrote (from the "a little knowledge is a dangerous thing" file): Yes, it IS simple physics. Simple physics to show that the contact patch will, at a given pressure and weight, be the same size, no matter how wide the tire. Simple physics to show that a rounder and shorter contact patch, of the same area, causes less sidewall deformation, ergo less internal friction, ergo less rolling resistance. Except that nobody runs a mountain bike tire at 100 psi. And that's not even considering knobby treads. Are you seriously trying to argue that mountain bikes have lower rolling resistance than road bikes?? As the subj line says, we've been talking about mtb's on the street. With street tires, not knobbies. And I DO run my 1.5" CyclePro & 1.9" Cheng Shin at pretty close to 100. Scroll back up, and you'll see how we got to this point, CC Pete |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Why Do You Ride Mountain A Bike On Streets?
quote:
From (James=A0Lynx) Not a high end mountain bike BUT a pretty good Fuji Discovery II. I think it's a good bike. So far so good. :quote I have a Discovery 3. I have had it for nearly 2 years now. I like it a lot. I use it to ride trails and to go to work. I replaced the knobbies with some on/off road type tires (k-rads) for above reason. Much better ride than the knobs for the trip (3 miles) to work. Yet they still have some tread for the dirt trails I go to . The trails arent difficult by any means. So I ride a mtnb on road cause its the only bike I have, on raod is the only way to get to work plus the susp makes the ride more comfortable |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Why Do You Ride Mountain A Bike On Streets?
"Pete" wrote:
"Corvus Corvax" wrote: Except that nobody runs a mountain bike tire at 100 psi. And that's not even considering knobby treads. Are you seriously trying to argue that mountain bikes have lower rolling resistance than road bikes?? As the subj line says, we've been talking about mtb's on the street. With street tires, not knobbies. And I DO run my 1.5" CyclePro & 1.9" Cheng Shin at pretty close to 100. Scroll back up, and you'll see how we got to this point, CC Right you are. A nice reminder of why it's a bad idea to bother contributing to MV flamewars: you have to read the whole damn thread. Mea culpa. CC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mountain Bike Inventor Joins Mayors' Ride | Cycle America | General | 1 | June 3rd 04 02:53 AM |
Trips for Kids 13th Annual Bike Swap & Sale | Marilyn Price | General | 0 | June 1st 04 04:52 AM |
Need help --girlfriend needs 45 minutes to get Mountain bike "warmed up" each time we ride... | Dan Volker | Mountain Biking | 87 | January 19th 04 04:32 AM |
Recommendations for first Mountain bike ??? | Tom | Mountain Biking | 44 | November 18th 03 02:37 AM |
my new bike | Marian Rosenberg | General | 5 | October 19th 03 03:00 PM |