|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Black cyclist stopped by London cop for "anti-social behaviour"including not wearing helmet, number plate or hi-viz
On 03/07/2020 02:00, JNugent wrote:
On 02/07/2020 19:26, TMS320 wrote: On 02/07/2020 17:46, JNugent wrote: On 02/07/2020 14:17, TMS320 wrote: On 02/07/2020 13:05, JNugent wrote: On 02/07/2020 09:40, TMS320 wrote: On 02/07/2020 01:22, JNugent wrote: Being black is no excuse for that. It's just as dangerous (or, as TMS320 would have it, "disadvantageous") to pedestrians no matter what colour the law-breaking cyclist is. If you're going to quote somebody, get it right! My quote of your term was 100% accurate. Unlike you, I do know how to set up a sent folder. My quote of your term was 100% accurate. You're also numerically illiterate. ...whatever that might mean inside your head. My quote of your term was 100% accurate. Wasn't it? a) I know the words I wrote down. b) Your version is not accurate. c) What is "100%" supposed to mean? d) Stop being an irritating little twerp(*) (*)tautology is deliberate |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Black cyclist stopped by London cop for "anti-social behaviour"including not wearing helmet, number plate or hi-viz
On 03/07/2020 09:18, TMS320 wrote:
On 03/07/2020 02:00, JNugent wrote: On 02/07/2020 19:26, TMS320 wrote: On 02/07/2020 17:46, JNugent wrote: On 02/07/2020 14:17, TMS320 wrote: On 02/07/2020 13:05, JNugent wrote: On 02/07/2020 09:40, TMS320 wrote: On 02/07/2020 01:22, JNugent wrote: Being black is no excuse for that. It's just as dangerous (or, as TMS320 would have it, "disadvantageous") to pedestrians no matter what colour the law-breaking cyclist is. If you're going to quote somebody, get it right! My quote of your term was 100% accurate. Unlike you, I do know how to set up a sent folder. My quote of your term was 100% accurate. You're also numerically illiterate. ...whatever that might mean inside your head. My quote of your term was 100% accurate. Wasn't it? a) I know the words I wrote down. b) Your version is not accurate. c) What is "100%" supposed to mean? d) Stop being an irritating little twerp(*) (*)tautology is deliberate My quote of your term was 100% accurate. Wasn't it? Perhaps you now regret using it, as well you might. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Black cyclist stopped by London cop for "anti-social behaviour"including not wearing helmet, number plate or hi-viz
On 03/07/2020 15:48, JNugent wrote:
On 03/07/2020 09:18, TMS320 wrote: On 03/07/2020 02:00, JNugent wrote: On 02/07/2020 19:26, TMS320 wrote: On 02/07/2020 17:46, JNugent wrote: On 02/07/2020 14:17, TMS320 wrote: On 02/07/2020 13:05, JNugent wrote: On 02/07/2020 09:40, TMS320 wrote: On 02/07/2020 01:22, JNugent wrote: Being black is no excuse for that. It's just as dangerous (or, as TMS320 would have it, "disadvantageous") to pedestrians no matter what colour the law-breaking cyclist is. If you're going to quote somebody, get it right! My quote of your term was 100% accurate. Unlike you, I do know how to set up a sent folder. My quote of your term was 100% accurate. You're also numerically illiterate. ...whatever that might mean inside your head. My quote of your term was 100% accurate. Wasn't it? a) I know the words I wrote down. b) Your version is not accurate. c) What is "100%" supposed to mean? d) Stop being an irritating little twerp(*) (*)tautology is deliberate My quote of your term was 100% accurate. Wasn't it? Perhaps you now regret using it, as well you might. There is nothing to regret. Besides, whether it is my or your version, it doesn't reflect badly on me. And you still haven't explained what 100% means. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Black cyclist stopped by London cop for "anti-social behaviour" including not wearing helmet, number plate or hi-viz
On 03/07/2020 20:44, TMS320 wrote:
On 03/07/2020 15:48, JNugent wrote: On 03/07/2020 09:18, TMS320 wrote: On 03/07/2020 02:00, JNugent wrote: On 02/07/2020 19:26, TMS320 wrote: On 02/07/2020 17:46, JNugent wrote: On 02/07/2020 14:17, TMS320 wrote: On 02/07/2020 13:05, JNugent wrote: On 02/07/2020 09:40, TMS320 wrote: On 02/07/2020 01:22, JNugent wrote: Being black is no excuse for that. It's just as dangerous (or, as TMS320 would have it, "disadvantageous") to pedestrians no matter what colour the law-breaking cyclist is. If you're going to quote somebody, get it right! My quote of your term was 100% accurate. Unlike you, I do know how to set up a sent folder. My quote of your term was 100% accurate. You're also numerically illiterate. ...whatever that might mean inside your head. My quote of your term was 100% accurate. Wasn't it? a) I know the words I wrote down. b) Your version is not accurate. c) What is "100%" supposed to mean? d) Stop being an irritating little twerp(*) (*)tautology is deliberate My quote of your term was 100% accurate. Wasn't it? Perhaps you now regret using it, as well you might. There is nothing to regret. Besides, whether it is my or your version, it doesn't reflect badly on me. And you still haven't explained what 100% means. You don't understand the meaning of "100%". Why am I not surprised at that? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Black cyclist stopped by London cop for "anti-social behaviour"including not wearing helmet, number plate or hi-viz
On 04/07/2020 02:43, JNugent wrote:
On 03/07/2020 20:44, TMS320 wrote: And you still haven't explained what 100% means. You don't understand the meaning of "100%". I know what it means when used properly. I want to know you mean. Why am I not surprised at that? I am not surprised that you can't give an answer and have to wriggle out by asking another question. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Black cyclist stopped by London cop for "anti-social behaviour"including not wearing helmet, number plate or hi-viz
On 04/07/2020 12:37, TMS320 wrote:
On 04/07/2020 02:43, JNugent wrote: On 03/07/2020 20:44, TMS320 wrote: And you still haven't explained what 100% means. You don't understand the meaning of "100%". I know what it means when used properly. I want to know you mean. ............................................I want to know what you mean. Why am I not surprised at that? I am not surprised that you can't give an answer and have to wriggle out by asking another question. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Black cyclist stopped by London cop for "anti-social behaviour"including not wearing helmet, number plate or hi-viz
On 04/07/2020 12:37, TMS320 wrote:
On 04/07/2020 02:43, JNugent wrote: On 03/07/2020 20:44, TMS320 wrote: And you still haven't explained what 100% means. You don't understand the meaning of "100%". I know what it means when used properly. I want to know you mean. Why am I not surprised at that? I am not surprised that you can't give an answer and have to wriggle out by asking another question. You haven't asked a question. You simply made a statement that showed that you don't know what "100%" means. Have you thought of buying this book? https://tinyurl.com/yaq63qaf |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Black cyclist stopped by London cop for "anti-social behaviour"including not wearing helmet, number plate or hi-viz
On 04/07/2020 12:40, TMS320 wrote:
On 04/07/2020 12:37, TMS320 wrote: On 04/07/2020 02:43, JNugent wrote: On 03/07/2020 20:44, TMS320 wrote: And you still haven't explained what 100% means. You don't understand the meaning of "100%". I know what it means when used properly. I want to know you mean. ...........................................I want to know what you mean. When I use the term "100%", I use in its normal, everyday, sense. You could try some remedial English lessons, I suppose. Why am I not surprised at that? I am not surprised that you can't give an answer and have to wriggle out by asking another question. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Black cyclist stopped by London cop for "anti-social behaviour" including not wearing helmet, number plate or hi-viz
On 05/07/2020 00:20, JNugent wrote:
On 04/07/2020 12:40, TMS320 wrote: On 04/07/2020 12:37, TMS320 wrote: On 04/07/2020 02:43, JNugent wrote: On 03/07/2020 20:44, TMS320 wrote: And you still haven't explained what 100% means. You don't understand the meaning of "100%". I know what it means when used properly. I want to know you mean. ...........................................I want to know what you mean. When I use the term "100%", I use in its normal, everyday, sense... .... of clueless idiots. You could try some remedial English lessons, I suppose. It is a meaningless term not covered in formal language. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Black cyclist stopped by London cop for "anti-social behaviour"including not wearing helmet, number plate or hi-viz
On 05/07/2020 13:12, TMS320 wrote:
On 05/07/2020 00:20, JNugent wrote: On 04/07/2020 12:40, TMS320 wrote: On 04/07/2020 12:37, TMS320 wrote: On 04/07/2020 02:43, JNugent wrote: On 03/07/2020 20:44, TMS320 wrote: And you still haven't explained what 100% means. You don't understand the meaning of "100%". I know what it means when used properly. I want to know you mean. ...........................................I want to know what you mean. When I use the term "100%", I use in its normal, everyday, sense... ... of clueless idiots. You could try some remedial English lessons, I suppose. It is a meaningless term not covered in formal language. It may be informal, but everyone understands what it means. You're being pedantic. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"That's Lance Armstrong wearing the black and yellow helmet" | Texan in Belgium | Racing | 2 | July 12th 09 03:15 AM |
Anti-social behaviour | Brimstone | UK | 65 | June 10th 05 09:21 PM |
Anti-social behaviour | Brimstone | UK | 0 | June 6th 05 10:45 PM |
Anti-social behaviour | Brimstone | UK | 2 | June 6th 05 06:24 PM |
Anti-social behaviour | Brimstone | UK | 3 | June 6th 05 12:26 PM |