A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » Regional Cycling » UK
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Black cyclist stopped by London cop for "anti-social behaviour"including not wearing helmet, number plate or hi-viz



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old July 3rd 20, 09:18 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
TMS320
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,875
Default Black cyclist stopped by London cop for "anti-social behaviour"including not wearing helmet, number plate or hi-viz

On 03/07/2020 02:00, JNugent wrote:
On 02/07/2020 19:26, TMS320 wrote:
On 02/07/2020 17:46, JNugent wrote:
On 02/07/2020 14:17, TMS320 wrote:
On 02/07/2020 13:05, JNugent wrote:
On 02/07/2020 09:40, TMS320 wrote:
On 02/07/2020 01:22, JNugent wrote:

Being black is no excuse for that. It's just as dangerous (or, as
TMS320 would have it, "disadvantageous") to pedestrians no matter
what colour the law-breaking cyclist is.

If you're going to quote somebody, get it right!

My quote of your term was 100% accurate.

Unlike you, I do know how to set up a sent folder.

My quote of your term was 100% accurate.


You're also numerically illiterate.


...whatever that might mean inside your head.

My quote of your term was 100% accurate.

Wasn't it?


a) I know the words I wrote down.
b) Your version is not accurate.
c) What is "100%" supposed to mean?
d) Stop being an irritating little twerp(*)

(*)tautology is deliberate
Ads
  #12  
Old July 3rd 20, 03:48 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
JNugent[_12_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 805
Default Black cyclist stopped by London cop for "anti-social behaviour"including not wearing helmet, number plate or hi-viz

On 03/07/2020 09:18, TMS320 wrote:
On 03/07/2020 02:00, JNugent wrote:
On 02/07/2020 19:26, TMS320 wrote:
On 02/07/2020 17:46, JNugent wrote:
On 02/07/2020 14:17, TMS320 wrote:
On 02/07/2020 13:05, JNugent wrote:
On 02/07/2020 09:40, TMS320 wrote:
On 02/07/2020 01:22, JNugent wrote:

Being black is no excuse for that. It's just as dangerous (or,
as TMS320 would have it, "disadvantageous") to pedestrians no
matter what colour the law-breaking cyclist is.

If you're going to quote somebody, get it right!

My quote of your term was 100% accurate.

Unlike you, I do know how to set up a sent folder.

My quote of your term was 100% accurate.

You're also numerically illiterate.


...whatever that might mean inside your head.

My quote of your term was 100% accurate.

Wasn't it?


a) I know the words I wrote down.
b) Your version is not accurate.
c) What is "100%" supposed to mean?
d) Stop being an irritating little twerp(*)

(*)tautology is deliberate


My quote of your term was 100% accurate.

Wasn't it?

Perhaps you now regret using it, as well you might.


  #13  
Old July 3rd 20, 08:44 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
TMS320
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,875
Default Black cyclist stopped by London cop for "anti-social behaviour"including not wearing helmet, number plate or hi-viz

On 03/07/2020 15:48, JNugent wrote:
On 03/07/2020 09:18, TMS320 wrote:
On 03/07/2020 02:00, JNugent wrote:
On 02/07/2020 19:26, TMS320 wrote:
On 02/07/2020 17:46, JNugent wrote:
On 02/07/2020 14:17, TMS320 wrote:
On 02/07/2020 13:05, JNugent wrote:
On 02/07/2020 09:40, TMS320 wrote:
On 02/07/2020 01:22, JNugent wrote:

Being black is no excuse for that. It's just as dangerous (or,
as TMS320 would have it, "disadvantageous") to pedestrians no
matter what colour the law-breaking cyclist is.

If you're going to quote somebody, get it right!

My quote of your term was 100% accurate.

Unlike you, I do know how to set up a sent folder.

My quote of your term was 100% accurate.

You're also numerically illiterate.

...whatever that might mean inside your head.

My quote of your term was 100% accurate.

Wasn't it?


a) I know the words I wrote down.
b) Your version is not accurate.
c) What is "100%" supposed to mean?
d) Stop being an irritating little twerp(*)

(*)tautology is deliberate


My quote of your term was 100% accurate.

Wasn't it?

Perhaps you now regret using it, as well you might.


There is nothing to regret. Besides, whether it is my or your version,
it doesn't reflect badly on me.

And you still haven't explained what 100% means.
  #14  
Old July 4th 20, 02:43 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
JNugent[_12_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 805
Default Black cyclist stopped by London cop for "anti-social behaviour" including not wearing helmet, number plate or hi-viz

On 03/07/2020 20:44, TMS320 wrote:
On 03/07/2020 15:48, JNugent wrote:
On 03/07/2020 09:18, TMS320 wrote:
On 03/07/2020 02:00, JNugent wrote:
On 02/07/2020 19:26, TMS320 wrote:
On 02/07/2020 17:46, JNugent wrote:
On 02/07/2020 14:17, TMS320 wrote:
On 02/07/2020 13:05, JNugent wrote:
On 02/07/2020 09:40, TMS320 wrote:
On 02/07/2020 01:22, JNugent wrote:

Being black is no excuse for that. It's just as dangerous (or,
as TMS320 would have it, "disadvantageous") to pedestrians no
matter what colour the law-breaking cyclist is.

If you're going to quote somebody, get it right!

My quote of your term was 100% accurate.

Unlike you, I do know how to set up a sent folder.

My quote of your term was 100% accurate.

You're also numerically illiterate.

...whatever that might mean inside your head.

My quote of your term was 100% accurate.

Wasn't it?

a) I know the words I wrote down.
b) Your version is not accurate.
c) What is "100%" supposed to mean?
d) Stop being an irritating little twerp(*)

(*)tautology is deliberate


My quote of your term was 100% accurate.

Wasn't it?

Perhaps you now regret using it, as well you might.


There is nothing to regret. Besides, whether it is my or your version,
it doesn't reflect badly on me.

And you still haven't explained what 100% means.


You don't understand the meaning of "100%".

Why am I not surprised at that?
  #15  
Old July 4th 20, 12:37 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
TMS320
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,875
Default Black cyclist stopped by London cop for "anti-social behaviour"including not wearing helmet, number plate or hi-viz

On 04/07/2020 02:43, JNugent wrote:
On 03/07/2020 20:44, TMS320 wrote:

And you still haven't explained what 100% means.


You don't understand the meaning of "100%".


I know what it means when used properly. I want to know you mean.

Why am I not surprised at that?


I am not surprised that you can't give an answer and have to wriggle out
by asking another question.
  #16  
Old July 4th 20, 12:40 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
TMS320
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,875
Default Black cyclist stopped by London cop for "anti-social behaviour"including not wearing helmet, number plate or hi-viz

On 04/07/2020 12:37, TMS320 wrote:
On 04/07/2020 02:43, JNugent wrote:
On 03/07/2020 20:44, TMS320 wrote:

And you still haven't explained what 100% means.


You don't understand the meaning of "100%".


I know what it means when used properly. I want to know you mean.

............................................I want to know what you mean.


Why am I not surprised at that?


I am not surprised that you can't give an answer and have to wriggle
out by asking another question.


  #17  
Old July 5th 20, 12:18 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
JNugent[_12_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 805
Default Black cyclist stopped by London cop for "anti-social behaviour"including not wearing helmet, number plate or hi-viz

On 04/07/2020 12:37, TMS320 wrote:
On 04/07/2020 02:43, JNugent wrote:
On 03/07/2020 20:44, TMS320 wrote:

And you still haven't explained what 100% means.


You don't understand the meaning of "100%".


I know what it means when used properly. I want to know you mean.

Why am I not surprised at that?


I am not surprised that you can't give an answer and have to wriggle out
by asking another question.


You haven't asked a question.

You simply made a statement that showed that you don't know what "100%"
means.

Have you thought of buying this book?

https://tinyurl.com/yaq63qaf
  #18  
Old July 5th 20, 12:20 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
JNugent[_12_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 805
Default Black cyclist stopped by London cop for "anti-social behaviour"including not wearing helmet, number plate or hi-viz

On 04/07/2020 12:40, TMS320 wrote:
On 04/07/2020 12:37, TMS320 wrote:
On 04/07/2020 02:43, JNugent wrote:
On 03/07/2020 20:44, TMS320 wrote:

And you still haven't explained what 100% means.

You don't understand the meaning of "100%".


I know what it means when used properly. I want to know you mean.

...........................................I want to know what you mean.


When I use the term "100%", I use in its normal, everyday, sense.

You could try some remedial English lessons, I suppose.

Why am I not surprised at that?


I am not surprised that you can't give an answer and have to wriggle
out by asking another question.



  #19  
Old July 5th 20, 01:12 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
TMS320
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,875
Default Black cyclist stopped by London cop for "anti-social behaviour" including not wearing helmet, number plate or hi-viz

On 05/07/2020 00:20, JNugent wrote:
On 04/07/2020 12:40, TMS320 wrote:
On 04/07/2020 12:37, TMS320 wrote:
On 04/07/2020 02:43, JNugent wrote:
On 03/07/2020 20:44, TMS320 wrote:

And you still haven't explained what 100% means.

You don't understand the meaning of "100%".

I know what it means when used properly. I want to know you mean.

...........................................I want to know what you mean.


When I use the term "100%", I use in its normal, everyday, sense...


.... of clueless idiots.

You could try some remedial English lessons, I suppose.


It is a meaningless term not covered in formal language.
  #20  
Old July 5th 20, 01:27 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Bod[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,516
Default Black cyclist stopped by London cop for "anti-social behaviour"including not wearing helmet, number plate or hi-viz

On 05/07/2020 13:12, TMS320 wrote:
On 05/07/2020 00:20, JNugent wrote:
On 04/07/2020 12:40, TMS320 wrote:
On 04/07/2020 12:37, TMS320 wrote:
On 04/07/2020 02:43, JNugent wrote:
On 03/07/2020 20:44, TMS320 wrote:

And you still haven't explained what 100% means.

You don't understand the meaning of "100%".

I know what it means when used properly. I want to know you mean.

...........................................I want to know what you mean.


When I use the term "100%", I use in its normal, everyday, sense...


... of clueless idiots.

You could try some remedial English lessons, I suppose.


It is a meaningless term not covered in formal language.

It may be informal, but everyone understands what it means.
You're being pedantic.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"That's Lance Armstrong wearing the black and yellow helmet" Texan in Belgium Racing 2 July 12th 09 03:15 AM
Anti-social behaviour Brimstone UK 65 June 10th 05 09:21 PM
Anti-social behaviour Brimstone UK 0 June 6th 05 10:45 PM
Anti-social behaviour Brimstone UK 2 June 6th 05 06:24 PM
Anti-social behaviour Brimstone UK 3 June 6th 05 12:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.