The continuing success of urc

My, who would have thought that a cycling newsgroup would have so many
subscribers?
Over three times as many as the corresponding driving ng.
Thanks to all of those posters who keep urc such a popular, helpful and
inviting place for so many people :-)

http://www.swldxer.co.uk/success.jpg

--
Simon Mason
http://www.simonmason.karoo.net/

Simon Mason wrote:

My, who would have thought that a cycling newsgroup would have so
many subscribers? Over three times as many as the corresponding
driving ng. Thanks to all of those posters who keep urc such a
popular, helpful and inviting place for so many people :-)

http://www.swldxer.co.uk/success.jpg

Warms the ole cockles of yer 'eart, it does ..

--
Paul - xxx

On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 12:10:20 +0100, "Simon Mason"
wrote:

My, who would have thought that a cycling newsgroup would have so many
subscribers?
Over three times as many as the corresponding driving ng.
Thanks to all of those posters who keep urc such a popular, helpful and
inviting place for so many people :-)

http://www.swldxer.co.uk/success.jpg


ffs - you really are not bright are you
Have a guess what those numbers actually mean?

On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 12:10:20 +0100, "Simon Mason"
wrote:


http://www.swldxer.co.uk/success.jpg

"Subscribers"? This I presume refers to those poor souls using Google
Groups rather than Usenet?

On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 12:10:20 +0100, "Simon Mason"
wrote:

My, who would have thought that a cycling newsgroup would have so many
subscribers?
Over three times as many as the corresponding driving ng.
Thanks to all of those posters who keep urc such a popular, helpful and
inviting place for so many people :-)

http://www.swldxer.co.uk/success.jpg

Yebbut half those are Judith's sockpuppets...

Guy
--
Guy Chapman, http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
The usenet price promise: all opinions are guaranteed
to be worth at least what you paid for them.

On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 23:48:30 +0100, "Just zis Guy, you know?"
wrote:

On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 12:10:20 +0100, "Simon Mason"
wrote:

My, who would have thought that a cycling newsgroup would have so many
subscribers?
Over three times as many as the corresponding driving ng.
Thanks to all of those posters who keep urc such a popular, helpful and
inviting place for so many people :-)

http://www.swldxer.co.uk/success.jpg

Yebbut half those are Judith's sockpuppets...

Guy

Oh Porky - how we missed you; welcome back. How's the general health?

I suppose also the figures will include your Lou Knee posts.

The difference: I openly admit that I use various names in order to wind up the
****wits like you.

You on the other hand were caught switching names - but you did not have the
sense to realise that you were using the same IP address as you had previously
used. Now this was really such a silly mistake for someone who professes to be
an IT expert, it was laughable.

Is that why you have never been able to admit that it was you?

Have Dell realised what they have got caught up in the net yet? How long will
it be before they throw you back?

--

Total number of posts to URC from
IP Address:80.254.146.36 over 6 years = 7

Guy Chapman : 5
Lou Knee: 2

Coincidence?
(Guy Chapman Dell Magnet)

On Sep 5, 11:48*pm, "Just zis Guy, you know?"
wrote:
On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 12:10:20 +0100, "Simon Mason"

wrote:
My, who would have thought that a cycling newsgroup would have so many
subscribers?
Over three times as many as the corresponding driving ng.
Thanks to all of those posters who keep urc such a popular, helpful and
inviting place for so many people :-)

http://www.swldxer.co.uk/success.jpg

Yebbut half those are Judith's sockpuppets...

Guy
--
Guy Chapman,http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
The usenet price promise: all opinions are guaranteed
to be worth at least what you paid for them.

Any port in a storm though ;-)

--
Simon Mason

Judith wrote:


The difference: I openly admit that I use various names

Lying.

BugBear

On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 09:43:37 +0100, bugbear
wrote:

Judith wrote:


The difference: I openly admit that I use various names

Lying.

BugBear


Have you told Crispin he is a liar yet?

I see that you have a lot of time on your hands at Papermule; is business that
bad?

Have you considered using an automated spelling and grammar checker at
Papermule; I can let you have one at a very reasonable price.

You ought to think about it - you could run it on your own Papermule pages to
see how good it is - I am sure it will pick up a number of errors.

I always find that a company selling the sort of "solutions" which Papermule
tries to sell, needs to be squeaky clean on their own pages, don't you?


--
Hello Bugbear - I love the way that Papermule allow you to abuse the internet in their time.

Are they part of the BP organisation?

On Sep 5, 10:02*pm, Peter Parry wrote:
On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 12:10:20 +0100, "Simon Mason"

wrote:

http://www.swldxer.co.uk/success.jpg

"Subscribers"? *This I presume refers to those poor souls using Google
Groups rather than Usenet?

There must be *even more* people who come to urc than the ones
compiled by Google Groups then.
Even better.

--
Simon Mason