People ...

I wonder why so many people are bothered by the work some cyclists do,
and why they post barely concealed threats about them.

Looks like jealousy 'cos they have either ****ty jobs or none at all.
Or maybe, judging by some peoples frequency and times of posting, it's
plain old hypocrisy. Hate can be a strange master.

Just a thought ...

--
Paul - xxx

On Sep 6, 1:19*pm, "Paul - xxx" wrote:
I wonder why so many people are bothered by the work some cyclists do,
and why they post barely concealed threats about them.

Looks like jealousy 'cos they have either ****ty jobs or none at all.
Or maybe, judging by some peoples frequency and times of posting, it's
plain old hypocrisy. *Hate can be a strange master.

Just a thought ...

--
Paul - xxx

Don't worry, Paul.

Those that overstep the mark between banter and harassment with intent
to cause distress may find that they get their comeuppance in the end.
Stuff they have posted over the years can sound very different in a
court of law when read out by a prosecuting barrister. They forget
that unlike a verbal attack, the evidence on the Internet is in the
public domain and can be used against them. Court orders can be used
to find out who the real identity behind those abusers is, so they had
better tread very carefully.

--
Simon Mason

On 6 Sep 2011 12:19:42 GMT, "Paul - xxx" wrote:

I wonder why so many people are bothered by the work some cyclists do,
and why they post barely concealed threats about them.


When you say "the work some cyclists do" - you obviously mean ""the work some
cyclists don't do".

As far as I am concerned, if people post from their work system whilst they are
at work and they are having a go at me, then the gloves are off.

Feel free to point out any barely concealed threat you think that *I* may have
made here.

Judith wrote:
On 6 Sep 2011 12:19:42 GMT, "Paul - wrote:

I wonder why so many people are bothered by the work some cyclists do,
and why they post barely concealed threats about them.


When you say "the work some cyclists do" - you obviously mean ""the work some
cyclists don't do".

As far as I am concerned, if people post from their work system whilst they are
at work and they are having a go at me, then the gloves are off.

Why would it make a difference? I'm almost intrigued.

BugBear

On Tue, 6 Sep 2011 05:38:26 -0700 (PDT), Simon Mason
wrote:

On Sep 6, 1:19*pm, "Paul - xxx" wrote:
I wonder why so many people are bothered by the work some cyclists do,
and why they post barely concealed threats about them.

Looks like jealousy 'cos they have either ****ty jobs or none at all.
Or maybe, judging by some peoples frequency and times of posting, it's
plain old hypocrisy. *Hate can be a strange master.

Just a thought ...

--
Paul - xxx

Don't worry, Paul.

Those that overstep the mark between banter and harassment with intent
to cause distress may find that they get their comeuppance in the end.
Stuff they have posted over the years can sound very different in a
court of law when read out by a prosecuting barrister. They forget
that unlike a verbal attack, the evidence on the Internet is in the
public domain and can be used against them. Court orders can be used
to find out who the real identity behind those abusers is, so they had
better tread very carefully.


Porky Chapman been advising you has he?

As you say - what people say on the internet lives on:

Do you recall saying the following? Who was it about? From what email address?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It's the local middle managers who can be *******.

one fat git was given the task of gauging this demand.

This same tw*t goes around schools saying how "green" he is. Laughable.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You are a fool.

--
Simple Simon Mason - who cycles at 25mph in 20mph limits just because the limits do not apply to cyclists.
This includes exceeding the speed limit past three schools. A total disregard for the well-being of vulnerable road users.
The actions of a true psycholist.

"Simon Mason" wrote in message
...
On Sep 6, 1:19 pm, "Paul - xxx" wrote:
I wonder why so many people are bothered by the work some cyclists do,
and why they post barely concealed threats about them.

Looks like jealousy 'cos they have either ****ty jobs or none at all.
Or maybe, judging by some peoples frequency and times of posting, it's
plain old hypocrisy. Hate can be a strange master.

Just a thought ...

--
Paul - xxx

Don't worry, Paul.

Those that overstep the mark between banter and harassment with intent
to cause distress may find that they get their comeuppance in the end.
Stuff they have posted over the years can sound very different in a
court of law when read out by a prosecuting barrister.

Oh grow up.

"Judith" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 6 Sep 2011 05:38:26 -0700 (PDT), Simon Mason
wrote:

On Sep 6, 1:19 pm, "Paul - xxx" wrote:
I wonder why so many people are bothered by the work some cyclists do,
and why they post barely concealed threats about them.

Looks like jealousy 'cos they have either ****ty jobs or none at all.
Or maybe, judging by some peoples frequency and times of posting, it's
plain old hypocrisy. Hate can be a strange master.

Just a thought ...

--
Paul - xxx

Don't worry, Paul.

Those that overstep the mark between banter and harassment with intent
to cause distress may find that they get their comeuppance in the end.
Stuff they have posted over the years can sound very different in a
court of law when read out by a prosecuting barrister. They forget
that unlike a verbal attack, the evidence on the Internet is in the
public domain and can be used against them. Court orders can be used
to find out who the real identity behind those abusers is, so they had
better tread very carefully.


Porky Chapman been advising you has he?

As you say - what people say on the internet lives on:

It seems Phil W Lee has nothing but contempt for those who go "crying to the
authorities" rather than sort these things out man-to-man when he was
defending the cyclist thug who assaulted a motorist. After this, he must
think Mason is a cowardly piece of crap too.

"Simon Mason" wrote in message
...
On Sep 6, 1:19 pm, "Paul - xxx" wrote:
I wonder why so many people are bothered by the work some cyclists do,
and why they post barely concealed threats about them.

Looks like jealousy 'cos they have either ****ty jobs or none at all.
Or maybe, judging by some peoples frequency and times of posting, it's
plain old hypocrisy. Hate can be a strange master.

Just a thought ...

--
Paul - xxx

Don't worry, Paul.

Those that overstep the mark between banter and harassment with intent
to cause distress may find that they get their comeuppance in the end.
Stuff they have posted over the years can sound very different in a
court of law when read out by a prosecuting barrister. They forget
that unlike a verbal attack, the evidence on the Internet is in the
public domain and can be used against them. Court orders can be used
to find out who the real identity behind those abusers is, so they had
better tread very carefully.

Are you going to sue me Simon?

On Sep 6, 4:08*pm, "Mr. Benn" wrote:

Those that overstep the mark between banter and harassment with intent
to cause distress may find that they get their comeuppance in the end.
Stuff they have posted over the years can sound very different in a
court of law when read out by a prosecuting barrister. They forget
that unlike a verbal attack, the evidence on the Internet is in the
public domain and can be used against them. Court orders can be used
to find out who the real identity behind those abusers is, so they had
better tread very carefully.

Are you going to sue me Simon?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I wasn't thinking of myself - it's another case entirely.

--
Simon Mason

On Tue, 6 Sep 2011 08:42:38 -0700 (PDT), Simon Mason
wrote:

On Sep 6, 4:08*pm, "Mr. Benn" wrote:

Those that overstep the mark between banter and harassment with intent
to cause distress may find that they get their comeuppance in the end.
Stuff they have posted over the years can sound very different in a
court of law when read out by a prosecuting barrister. They forget
that unlike a verbal attack, the evidence on the Internet is in the
public domain and can be used against them. Court orders can be used
to find out who the real identity behind those abusers is, so they had
better tread very carefully.

Are you going to sue me Simon?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I wasn't thinking of myself - it's another case entirely.


Are you thinking of the page which Porky Chapman wrote slandering Nuxx Bar?

I have a copy of it which I downloaded and saved, before Porky took the page
down recently, if you want a copy.

Porky makes *you* look almost bright.
--

Total number of posts to URC from
IP Address:80.254.146.36 over 6 years = 7

Guy Chapman : 5
Lou Knee: 2

Coincidence?
(Guy Chapman Dell Magnet)