A good week for Simon Mason

Well, an amazing week with 291 posts made.
However it was not actually a full week, as there were only 6 days of posting;
giving an awesome 50 posts a day.
Well done Simon, and keep them coming. Don't take any of this crap about
posting in BP's time; if you have something interesting to say, then say it!!

"MM" wrote in message
...


Well, an amazing week with 291 posts made.
However it was not actually a full week, as there were only 6 days of
posting;
giving an awesome 50 posts a day.
Well done Simon, and keep them coming. Don't take any of this crap about
posting in BP's time; if you have something interesting to say, then say
it!!

A quick look at how many threads he starts that get no replies, should
illustrate just how uninteresting his posts are.

If it wasn't for the replies that correct his "facts" or take the ****, I
reckon he'd have a "hit" rate of about 1 post in 20.

On 29-Aug-2011, "Mentalguy2k8" wrote:

"MM" wrote in message
...


Well, an amazing week with 291 posts made.
However it was not actually a full week, as there were only 6 days of
posting;
giving an awesome 50 posts a day.
Well done Simon, and keep them coming. Don't take any of this crap
about
posting in BP's time; if you have something interesting to say, then say

it!!

A quick look at how many threads he starts that get no replies, should
illustrate just how uninteresting his posts are.

If it wasn't for the replies that correct his "facts" or take the ****, I
reckon he'd have a "hit" rate of about 1 post in 20.

No a zero response sometimes means the point made is irrefutable.

Doug.

"Doug" wrote in message
...

On 29-Aug-2011, "Mentalguy2k8" wrote:

"MM" wrote in message
...


Well, an amazing week with 291 posts made.
However it was not actually a full week, as there were only 6 days of
posting;
giving an awesome 50 posts a day.
Well done Simon, and keep them coming. Don't take any of this crap
about
posting in BP's time; if you have something interesting to say, then
say

it!!

A quick look at how many threads he starts that get no replies, should
illustrate just how uninteresting his posts are.

If it wasn't for the replies that correct his "facts" or take the ****, I
reckon he'd have a "hit" rate of about 1 post in 20.

No a zero response sometimes means the point made is irrefutable.

Or nobody is interested in what he eats for lunch. Or how many pints of
beer he drinks.

MM wrote:


So many "new" subscribers on this forum, and all
talking about Mr Mason.

BugBear

On Aug 31, 3:27*pm, bugbear wrote:

So many "new" subscribers on this forum, and all
talking about Mr Mason.

* BugBear

Hello Bugbear.
Well I never.
I was sure that someone vowed to destroy urc some time ago and now it
seems it is as popular as ever if it is attracting so many newcomers.
I have heard that uk.rec.driving is more or less dead now with just
grumpy old Firth and a few other posters bickering amongst themselves.
If urc is still a lively and popular part of usenet as you say, it
only mirrors the boom in cycling not just in the UK, but worldwide.

Long may it continue. :-)

--
Simon Mason

On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:09:52 -0700 (PDT), Simon Mason
wrote:

On Aug 31, 3:27*pm, bugbear wrote:

So many "new" subscribers on this forum, and all
talking about Mr Mason.

* BugBear

Hello Bugbear.
Well I never.
I was sure that someone vowed to destroy urc some time ago


Was it Porky Chapman?

--
Simple Simon Mason - who cycles at 25mph in 20mph limits just because the limits do not apply to cyclists.
This includes exceeding the speed limit past three schools. A total disregard for the well-being of vulnerable road users.
The actions of a true psycholist.

Judith wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:09:52 -0700 (PDT), Simon
wrote:

On Aug 31, 3:27 pm, wrote:

So many "new" subscribers on this forum, and all
talking about Mr Mason.

BugBear

Hello Bugbear.
Well I never.
I was sure that someone vowed to destroy urc some time ago


Was it Porky Chapman?

Ad Hominem (ad nauseam)

BugBear

On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 20:00:46 +0100, Judith wrote:

On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:09:52 -0700 (PDT), Simon Mason

I was sure that someone vowed to destroy urc some time ago


Was it Porky Chapman?

A variety of bioluminescent displays (Herring et al., 1994; Hunt, 1996)
combined with unpredictable flips and turns allow V. infernalis to hide
safely from pursuing predators in its darkened habitat without swimming
more than a few meters.


--

snip


--
If you are riding a bicycle you are winning.

On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 09:25:29 +0100, bugbear
wrote:

Judith wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:09:52 -0700 (PDT), Simon
wrote:

On Aug 31, 3:27 pm, wrote:

So many "new" subscribers on this forum, and all
talking about Mr Mason.

BugBear

Hello Bugbear.
Well I never.
I was sure that someone vowed to destroy urc some time ago


Was it Porky Chapman?

Ad Hominem (ad nauseam)

BugBear
--
Hello Bugbear - I love the way that Papermule allow you to abuse the internet in their time.

Are they part of the BP organisation?