|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
"Shut it Up Popo"* - Popovych says he knows nothing !
On Nov 5, 12:21*pm, Ben Trovato wrote:
Are you referring to Texas (incl. "liberal" Austin) being a right-to- carry state? Well, I might be confused, but to me, right-to-carry *is* "liberal", as opposed to being rigidly controlled and outlawed, when only the outlaws (and police) can carry guns g. Yeah! *Damn right! *9/11 woulda never happened if all the passengers had been armed! Better, if the mighty titans of industry had simply put locks on the cockpit doors, as had been practice in Europe for some time... (Just a little hubris, everyone-- I mean, we don't want to be like those weakling socialist europeans, do we?) Then Gordon Bethune came on TV and begged for money. Well, they got the money, still laid off the workers, and spent the money to buy fleets of very profitable charter planes, while old white men with hip replacements were forced to take off their pants behind flimsy screens set up in airports coast-to-coast. --D-y |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
"Shut it Up Popo"* - Popovych says he knows nothing !
In article ,
BLafferty wrote: On 11/5/2010 1:45 PM, Frederick the Great wrote: In articlexL2dnQ0B2sQHvknRnZ2dnUVZ_sWdnZ2d@giganews. com, wrote: On 11/5/2010 10:17 AM, Brad Anders wrote: On Nov 4, 12:39 pm, wrote: http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/popo...ing-doping?ns_... And that from the man who was total crap at Lotto...I guess that helped him not joining the ranks of the ex-uniballer mountain henchmen to fall for doping, I guess there aren't too many around, let's see...Rubiera only comes to mind for now. Yeah, this theory that all of LA's teammates were going to be so terrified of the GJ that they'd all just roll over and spill the beans just isn't working out, is it? Brad Anders Brad, could you post a copy of the grand jury transcript of Popo's testimony? You really have no idea what's going down in the Grand Jury room. It's not at all unusual for co-conspirators to all lie in their testimony. Now, I'm not saying Popo lied because I don't know what he said. But, it's possible. Candyass. You should also consider that there are times when a witness testifies one way in the room, and denies having testified that way on leaving the room. It delays an unpleasant scene which can be deadly amongst some folks engaged in criminal activity. Tonight Popo sleeps with the fishes. More likely with his girlfriend. Candyass. -- Old Fritz |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
"Shut it Up Popo"* - Popovych says he knows nothing !
On Nov 5, 12:51*pm, Frederick the Great wrote:
In article , *BLafferty wrote: On 11/5/2010 1:45 PM, Frederick the Great wrote: Brad, could you post a copy of the grand jury transcript of Popo's testimony? You really have no idea what's going down in the Grand Jury room. It's not at all unusual for co-conspirators to all lie in their testimony. *Now, I'm not saying Popo lied because I don't know what he said. But, it's possible. Candyass. You should also consider that there are times when a witness testifies one way in the room, and denies having testified that way on leaving the room. It delays an unpleasant scene which can be deadly amongst some folks engaged in criminal activity. Tonight Popo sleeps with the fishes. More likely with his girlfriend. Candyass. I've been trying to figure out why Lafferty wanted to see a photo of Popovych being served with his grand jury subpoena - I mean, what could such a picture possibly prove, or how could it be used as evidence in the Crusade? I finally figured it out. The picture is important because Lafferty thinks (not unreasonably) that it might tell us whether Popo's girlfriend looks like Lance's Mom. Fredmaster Ben |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
"Shut it Up Popo"* - Popovych says he knows nothing !
On Nov 5, 9:51*pm, Fredmaster of Brainerd wrote:
I've been trying to figure out why Lafferty wanted to see a photo of Popovych being served with his grand jury subpoena - I mean, what could such a picture possibly prove, or how could it be used as evidence in the Crusade? I finally figured it out. *The picture is important because Lafferty thinks (not unreasonably) that it might tell us whether Popo's girlfriend looks like Lance's Mom. I think L'enema will have to find new wanking material elsewhere. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jonath..._b_778654.html R |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
"Shut it Up Popo"* - Popovych says he knows nothing !
BLafferty" wrote in message
... On 11/5/2010 12:23 PM, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote: wrote in message ... On 11/5/2010 10:17 AM, Brad Anders wrote: On Nov 4, 12:39 pm, wrote: http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/popo...ing-doping?ns_... And that from the man who was total crap at Lotto...I guess that helped him not joining the ranks of the ex-uniballer mountain henchmen to fall for doping, I guess there aren't too many around, let's see...Rubiera only comes to mind for now. Yeah, this theory that all of LA's teammates were going to be so terrified of the GJ that they'd all just roll over and spill the beans just isn't working out, is it? Brad Anders Brad, could you post a copy of the grand jury transcript of Popo's testimony? You really have no idea what's going down in the Grand Jury room. It's not at all unusual for co-conspirators to all lie in their testimony. Now, I'm not saying Popo lied because I don't know what he said. But, it's possible. You should also consider that there are times when a witness testifies one way in the room, and denies having testified that way on leaving the room. It delays an unpleasant scene which can be deadly amongst some folks engaged in criminal activity. Most deadly scenes are unpleasant, for at least one of the parties involved. If you're right, the feds have better orchestrate serving Lance like they did Popo, and make sure to do so in a liberal state where it's less likely Lance will be surrounded by supporters with guns. So were you holding back on this scenario or what? I don't recall you previously suggesting that Lance's accusers could meet an untimely demise. --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com I haven't suggested any such think. My reference was to certain folks involved in another type of organized crime. You should also consider that there are times when a witness testifies one way in the room, and denies having testified that way on leaving the room. It delays an unpleasant scene which can be deadly amongst some folks engaged in criminal activity. So then this was *not* one of those times where someone might not be truthful about how he/she testified? I get the point that you're trying to construct a scenario in which the grand jury participant is scared to talk about what he said. But you haven't explained why that would be the case for this situation. You've only produced an over-the-top situation that you say isn't appropriate. --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
"Shut it Up Popo"* - Popovych says he knows nothing !
On 11/6/2010 4:06 AM, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote:
wrote in message ... On 11/5/2010 12:23 PM, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote: wrote in message ... On 11/5/2010 10:17 AM, Brad Anders wrote: On Nov 4, 12:39 pm, wrote: http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/popo...ing-doping?ns_... And that from the man who was total crap at Lotto...I guess that helped him not joining the ranks of the ex-uniballer mountain henchmen to fall for doping, I guess there aren't too many around, let's see...Rubiera only comes to mind for now. Yeah, this theory that all of LA's teammates were going to be so terrified of the GJ that they'd all just roll over and spill the beans just isn't working out, is it? Brad Anders Brad, could you post a copy of the grand jury transcript of Popo's testimony? You really have no idea what's going down in the Grand Jury room. It's not at all unusual for co-conspirators to all lie in their testimony. Now, I'm not saying Popo lied because I don't know what he said. But, it's possible. You should also consider that there are times when a witness testifies one way in the room, and denies having testified that way on leaving the room. It delays an unpleasant scene which can be deadly amongst some folks engaged in criminal activity. Most deadly scenes are unpleasant, for at least one of the parties involved. If you're right, the feds have better orchestrate serving Lance like they did Popo, and make sure to do so in a liberal state where it's less likely Lance will be surrounded by supporters with guns. So were you holding back on this scenario or what? I don't recall you previously suggesting that Lance's accusers could meet an untimely demise. --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com I haven't suggested any such think. My reference was to certain folks involved in another type of organized crime. You should also consider that there are times when a witness testifies one way in the room, and denies having testified that way on leaving the room. It delays an unpleasant scene which can be deadly amongst some folks engaged in criminal activity. So then this was *not* one of those times where someone might not be truthful about how he/she testified? Don't know. We have no idea what he actually said to the Grand Jury. Sometimes, GJ witnesses inadvertently give the government additional leads to pursue. So really, there are just a lot of questions. Eventually, the GJ testimony will all come out. I get the point that you're trying to construct a scenario in which the grand jury participant is scared to talk about what he said. But you haven't explained why that would be the case for this situation. You've only produced an over-the-top situation that you say isn't appropriate. --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
"Shut it Up Popo"* - Popovych says he knows nothing !
On 11/6/2010 1:42 AM, RicodJour wrote:
On Nov 5, 9:51 pm, Fredmaster of wrote: I've been trying to figure out why Lafferty wanted to see a photo of Popovych being served with his grand jury subpoena - I mean, what could such a picture possibly prove, or how could it be used as evidence in the Crusade? I finally figured it out. The picture is important because Lafferty thinks (not unreasonably) that it might tell us whether Popo's girlfriend looks like Lance's Mom. I think L'enema will have to find new wanking material elsewhere. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jonath..._b_778654.html R Mr. Littman is very much a Lance apologist in the guise of curmudgeon. Look at his 9/30 piece and my comment to it. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
"Shut it Up Popo"* - Popovych says he knows nothing !
On Nov 6, 8:06*am, BLafferty wrote:
On 11/6/2010 1:42 AM, RicodJour wrote: On Nov 5, 9:51 pm, Fredmaster of *wrote: I've been trying to figure out why Lafferty wanted to see a photo of Popovych being served with his grand jury subpoena - I mean, what could such a picture possibly prove, or how could it be used as evidence in the Crusade? I finally figured it out. *The picture is important because Lafferty thinks (not unreasonably) that it might tell us whether Popo's girlfriend looks like Lance's Mom. I think L'enema will have to find new wanking material elsewhere. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jonath...mstrong-ambush... R Mr. Littman is very much a Lance apologist in the guise of curmudgeon. Look at his 9/30 piece and my comment to it. I saw your comment didn't garner you any fans, Brian. I guess most people don't appreciate gestapo-style intimidation tactics. "A casually dressed woman flashed a badge" after two vehicles stopped Popo's car. Wow. That's why those in the public eye tend to hire bodyguards. I also saw the "hubris" part. Good, you are in touch with your real motivations here. The list of alleged offenses is just a means to an end. Novitsky is known to have a similar hatred (to yours for Lance Armstrong) of Barry Bonds. So, here we are, back to square one: "Brian Lafferty doesn't like Lance Armstrong because Lance Armstrong has a big head in the opinion of Brian Lafferty". Following the description of events given: "Agents" who don't identify themselves, grab door handles, block free passage? How many unlawful acts were committed in a simple serving of papers? Along with Novitsky's illegally seizing evidence and then holding on to said evidence in spite of repeated "requests" to give it up, bragging about book deals, intimidation of witnesses, it would appear there is enough hubris to go around in this affair. And threats jail sentences, too. Well, OK: Let's start with Lemond. How much of that potential year in the slammer should Greggo get for taping Stephanie without her permission, and then making the content public, Brian? How about a month or so behind bars, just to make it real, and then 400 hours of supervised community service? No, not riding his bicycle in some self-serving bull**** "giving back" publicity stunt, but dressed in an orange jump suit and assigned to pick up trash along his adopted hometown's roadways? Sounds good to me. "He broke the law!" --D-y |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
"Shut it Up Popo"* - Popovych says he knows nothing !
"BLafferty" wrote in message
... On 11/6/2010 4:06 AM, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote: wrote in message ... On 11/5/2010 12:23 PM, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote: wrote in message ... On 11/5/2010 10:17 AM, Brad Anders wrote: On Nov 4, 12:39 pm, wrote: http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/popo...ing-doping?ns_... And that from the man who was total crap at Lotto...I guess that helped him not joining the ranks of the ex-uniballer mountain henchmen to fall for doping, I guess there aren't too many around, let's see...Rubiera only comes to mind for now. Yeah, this theory that all of LA's teammates were going to be so terrified of the GJ that they'd all just roll over and spill the beans just isn't working out, is it? Brad Anders Brad, could you post a copy of the grand jury transcript of Popo's testimony? You really have no idea what's going down in the Grand Jury room. It's not at all unusual for co-conspirators to all lie in their testimony. Now, I'm not saying Popo lied because I don't know what he said. But, it's possible. You should also consider that there are times when a witness testifies one way in the room, and denies having testified that way on leaving the room. It delays an unpleasant scene which can be deadly amongst some folks engaged in criminal activity. Most deadly scenes are unpleasant, for at least one of the parties involved. If you're right, the feds have better orchestrate serving Lance like they did Popo, and make sure to do so in a liberal state where it's less likely Lance will be surrounded by supporters with guns. So were you holding back on this scenario or what? I don't recall you previously suggesting that Lance's accusers could meet an untimely demise. --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com I haven't suggested any such think. My reference was to certain folks involved in another type of organized crime. You should also consider that there are times when a witness testifies one way in the room, and denies having testified that way on leaving the room. It delays an unpleasant scene which can be deadly amongst some folks engaged in criminal activity. So then this was *not* one of those times where someone might not be truthful about how he/she testified? Don't know. We have no idea what he actually said to the Grand Jury. Sometimes, GJ witnesses inadvertently give the government additional leads to pursue. So really, there are just a lot of questions. Eventually, the GJ testimony will all come out. And there's always the possibility that a somewhat-confused witness, one without a great grasp of English, might be prone to saying something he really would have thought better of otherwise. Even if that weren't the case, the room for literal "interpretation" of what he said or meant might give a lot more ammunition for a prosecutor. I get the point that you're trying to construct a scenario in which the grand jury participant is scared to talk about what he said. But you haven't explained why that would be the case for this situation. You've only produced an over-the-top situation that you say isn't appropriate. --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
"Shut it Up Popo"* - Popovych says he knows nothing !
On 11/6/2010 11:45 AM, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote:
wrote in message ... On 11/6/2010 4:06 AM, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote: wrote in message ... On 11/5/2010 12:23 PM, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote: wrote in message ... On 11/5/2010 10:17 AM, Brad Anders wrote: On Nov 4, 12:39 pm, wrote: http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/popo...ing-doping?ns_... And that from the man who was total crap at Lotto...I guess that helped him not joining the ranks of the ex-uniballer mountain henchmen to fall for doping, I guess there aren't too many around, let's see...Rubiera only comes to mind for now. Yeah, this theory that all of LA's teammates were going to be so terrified of the GJ that they'd all just roll over and spill the beans just isn't working out, is it? Brad Anders Brad, could you post a copy of the grand jury transcript of Popo's testimony? You really have no idea what's going down in the Grand Jury room. It's not at all unusual for co-conspirators to all lie in their testimony. Now, I'm not saying Popo lied because I don't know what he said. But, it's possible. You should also consider that there are times when a witness testifies one way in the room, and denies having testified that way on leaving the room. It delays an unpleasant scene which can be deadly amongst some folks engaged in criminal activity. Most deadly scenes are unpleasant, for at least one of the parties involved. If you're right, the feds have better orchestrate serving Lance like they did Popo, and make sure to do so in a liberal state where it's less likely Lance will be surrounded by supporters with guns. So were you holding back on this scenario or what? I don't recall you previously suggesting that Lance's accusers could meet an untimely demise. --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com I haven't suggested any such think. My reference was to certain folks involved in another type of organized crime. You should also consider that there are times when a witness testifies one way in the room, and denies having testified that way on leaving the room. It delays an unpleasant scene which can be deadly amongst some folks engaged in criminal activity. So then this was *not* one of those times where someone might not be truthful about how he/she testified? Don't know. We have no idea what he actually said to the Grand Jury. Sometimes, GJ witnesses inadvertently give the government additional leads to pursue. So really, there are just a lot of questions. Eventually, the GJ testimony will all come out. And there's always the possibility that a somewhat-confused witness, one without a great grasp of English, might be prone to saying something he really would have thought better of otherwise. Even if that weren't the case, the room for literal "interpretation" of what he said or meant might give a lot more ammunition for a prosecutor. I have no doubt that Popo was provided with a court certified translator. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"John "Cho" Gilmer keeps publishing his "Manifesto" over and over." | Hoodini | Racing | 0 | April 23rd 07 12:38 AM |
Vandeman calls mountain bikers "liars" and "criminals" then surprised by hate mail! | Mike Vandeman | Mountain Biking | 0 | June 1st 06 08:15 PM |
Vandeman calls mountain bikers "liars" and "criminals" then surprisedby hate mail! | ChainSmoker | Mountain Biking | 0 | May 27th 06 05:39 PM |
R.I.P. Jim Price (aka. "biker_billy", "sydney", "Boudreaux") | spin156 | Techniques | 15 | November 28th 05 07:21 PM |