|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#371
|
|||
|
|||
Fat people? Less gas!
Richard Evans wrote:
I didn't say it was rock bottom, I said it was conservative. Of course some can get lower payments, especially if they stretch to 60-month financing. If you had a $300/month payment with zero interest you'd be paying $18k. The same for 48 months is $375. Are you trying to tell me that $18k is not at the lower spectrum of new car prices? A year ago, I was shopping for a car. The finalists were two new models and one no-longer-made model. One of the finalists was the Suzuki Swift+. It doesn't get the gas mileage I wanted, but the price difference could buy a lot of gas. If you were willing to self-finance, the car was available for under $12K plus taxes. And that was at a time when C$12K was worth about US$11. And I'm a lousy negotiator. If they were offering it to me for $11,998, I'm sure someone else could have got it for $10,500. -- Tomorrow is today already. Greg Goss, 1989-01-27 |
Ads |
#372
|
|||
|
|||
Fat people? Less gas!
On Nov 11, 10:51 am, Boron Elgar wrote:
Lesson - you can get a good car or lemon from any manufacturer and in any model line. The most unreliable cars ever owned in this household are a Toyota Camry, followed by a Honda Accord. Most reliable have been a Mercury Grand Marquis, two Ford Expeditions, A Chevy Silverado and a Nissan Murano. But it does not follow that you should choose your car model at random, without regard to reliability records. That would be like saying "some people have fallen great heights and lived, so I'm going skydiving without a parachute." It's smart to pay attention to reliability data. Again, I've found Consumer Reports survey data to be pretty accurate. - Frank Krygowski |
#373
|
|||
|
|||
Fat people? Less gas!
|
#374
|
|||
|
|||
Fat people? Less gas!
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 15:11:27 -0700, Greg Goss wrote:
If you were willing to self-finance, the car was available for under $12K plus taxes. And that was at a time when C$12K was worth about US$11. I knew the ratio was bad at one time - but had no idea it was THAT bad. |
#375
|
|||
|
|||
Fat people? Less gas!
Boron Elgar ) wrote:
Lesson - you can get a good car or lemon from any manufacturer and in any model line. The most unreliable cars ever owned in this household are a Toyota Camry, followed by a Honda Accord. Most reliable have been a Mercury Grand Marquis, two Ford Expeditions, A Chevy Silverado and a Nissan Murano. Gee, go figure. That does seem to run counter to many people's experience--at least on the Toyota and Honda being unreliable. Our most unreliable car was my '79 Honda Accord. I should've check Consumer Reports. They would've warned me about the brakes and the possibility of blowing a head gasket. Second most unreliable was an '87 Toyota Corolla, but it wasn't particularly unreliable. It just had that problem with the cooling system where the mechanics could never locate the leak. So we replaced the thermostat, the radiator, hoses, you name it. It was one of those infuriating single problems that we seemed to keep having the car into the shop for. The '86 Chevy Sprint was middling reliable. So was the '89 Ford Escort. (Hand-me-down from Grandma. I wouldn't have bought it.) The '86 Toyota Tercel was very reliable. The only time it ever stranded anyone was when the timing belt broke at 100+k miles. (I ended up doing something ethically questionable about that and I will herewith confess. I picked up the stranded Mrs. Penguin and drove us straight to AAA. I did not clarify with the agent whether the policy covered pre-existing conditions. I suspect I would have been told yes, but I decided to play it sneaky and not ask. I just drove to a pay phone near our broken down car and called AAA for a tow truck. So now my conscience nags me every so often when the weather changes.) The '99 Altima has been quite reliable for the year and half we've had it (from 125k to 145k miles). The '94 Honda Civic has been super reliable for the three years we've had it (from 65k to 120k miles). Not a problem to speak of except what arose from hitting the deer, and you can hardly blame a car for that. Anecdotal though this all is, our experience has been basically what Consumer Reports readers predicted. Except for the '87 Corolla and the nagging unfixable problem. -- Opus the Penguin I'm not a lurker, but if I were, I would support you in email. - Hactar |
#376
|
|||
|
|||
Fat people? Less gas!
Greg Goss ) wrote:
Tom Sherman wrote: Greg Goss wrote: Lesson - do not buy from manufacturers that make unreliable vehicles? The Metro has the initials "GM" and a Chev logo buried in the Geo planet logo. Wouldn't that advice chase me away from a GM? The Geo Metro is a re-badged Suzuki. Which is why I bought it in the first place. It's a bit more complex than merely "rebadged". Su designed the car and the factory for them, but I think it was managed as a routine GM factory in Ontario in operation. And, according to a local Su dealer, Suzuki never used the 1 litre engine that most of these were built with. Obviously, since GM cannot build a reliable small engine to save their company, the 1 litre engine must be a Suzuki design, but if it was never used in the Swift or the Forsa, it's not quite right to call it a "rebadged Suzuki". But the manufacturer was still GM, once Suzuki had built the factory for them. You're from the other side of this two-newsgroup discussion. AFCA is proud of its nitpicking. I wouldn't say we're "proud" exactly. But we are competitive. Other than that, you've made a fine post. Well, maybe not fine, but.... -- Opus the Penguin I have to say, the combination of firearms, homemade booze, and Billy Ray playing the bagpipes spells "fun" to me - Richard R. Hershberger |
#377
|
|||
|
|||
Fat people? Less gas!
On Nov 11, 7:14 pm, Bob Ward wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:06:55 -0000, wrote: Again, I've found Consumer Reports survey data to be pretty accurate. - Frank Krygowski ... or not... Suzuki Samurai was a hatchet job. You misread. I said their _survey_ data, not their editorializing. Over the years, I've found many problems with their editorial judgments. But the annual car issue reports the results of subscriber surveys, with hundreds of thousands of people saying what's gone wrong with their cars in the previous year. I find the data from those surveys to be good information. It matched my experience, down to specifying the parts of the car that would have trouble. - Frank Krygowski |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What odd people | vey | Techniques | 39 | October 22nd 07 10:00 AM |
new here...looking for people. | ilosttheotherwheel | Unicycling | 14 | August 6th 06 03:51 AM |
Sorry people | Keaton | Unicycling | 16 | January 2nd 05 06:43 AM |
GET WITH IT PEOPLE! | Tom Sherman | Recumbent Biking | 6 | January 1st 05 01:46 PM |
you people are gay | MagillaGorilla | Racing | 282 | December 7th 04 07:06 PM |