#11
|
|||
|
|||
insurance
In aus.bicycle on 15 Mar 2007 05:58:00 -0700
Bleve wrote: On Mar 15, 9:52 pm, "Steve B." wrote: Of course, if you need something badly - business machinery perhaps - and don't have the resources to replace it if it's written off, then it might be prudent to buy insurance (which, in this case, will be tax-deductible anyway). That's influenced by 2 things, how much (and how badly ....) you ride, and what your bike(s) are worth. MY motorcycles aren't worth comprehensive insurance, haven't had it on a bike for years. The 'bent is insured against theft and being damaged while in the shed - fire, stuff falling on it - but not while being ridden. On the other hand, I'm willing to pay the Bicycle NSW membership fee for, amongst other things, the insurance they provide against me damaging someone else or their possessions while riding. Same as I insure the motorcycles for that. The potential loss is much higher. And I'd rather the insurance company fight the court case... Zebee |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
insurance
In aus.bicycle on 15 Mar 2007 05:56:31 -0700
Bleve wrote: There's a number of options. Cyclecover is a good one, I believe, basically it's home contents insurance that covers bikes while being ridden (and with a sircharge, while being raced). Bicycle Victoria has insurance (excess is $1000, which is hidden deep in the fine print, be aware ...) which is also like car insurance - 3rd party property as well as your own bike, but AFAIK, not while racing. The BV insurance isn't restricted to Victoria, if I recall correctly. Sure it covers the bike? That's interesting because the BNSW insurance doesn't.... Zebee |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
insurance
RobM wrote:
Certain small outgo versus small chance of one big outgo ... take your pick! I got a quote from them last year. It was something like $150, for a bike i was insuring for $1300. I'd consider a small outgo to be 1%, my house insurance is about 0.125%. But I wouldn't consider 10% to be small. Hell that takes me back to when I bought my first decent motorbike, where the bank required compulsory full comprehensive which was around 25% of the bike value. DaveB |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
insurance
On 15 Mar 2007 19:05:36 GMT, Zebee Johnstone wrote:
MY motorcycles aren't worth comprehensive insurance, haven't had it on a bike for years. The 'bent is insured against theft and being damaged while in the shed - fire, stuff falling on it - but not while being ridden. On the other hand, I'm willing to pay the Bicycle NSW membership fee for, amongst other things, the insurance they provide against me damaging someone else or their possessions while riding. Same as I insure the motorcycles for that. The potential loss is much higher. And I'd rather the insurance company fight the court case... Zebee Likewise, just Pedal Power ACT membership, worth it for the 3rd party alone. I want to decide if I want to repair or replace, and make that an emotional decision if I want. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
insurance
In aus.bicycle on Fri, 16 Mar 2007 07:28:16 +1100
DaveB wrote: I got a quote from them last year. It was something like $150, for a bike i was insuring for $1300. I'd consider a small outgo to be 1%, my house insurance is about 0.125%. But I wouldn't consider 10% to be small. Hell that takes me back to when I bought my first decent motorbike, where the bank required compulsory full comprehensive which was around 25% of the bike value. I tried a contents insurance quote from them. Was twice my current quote, and that made it somethign like 10% of the bike's value. Makes me wonder what the risk profile looks like... are they just making money from a credulous audience, or do insurance companies reckon bikes get totalled too often, or in such circumstances that it's not worth the business? My guess is that most of them class it as "used on the road therefore related to car crash stats but they don't have VIN markings, and you can't panelbeat them but must always replace, not worth it." Zebee |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
insurance
On Mar 16, 6:06 am, Zebee Johnstone wrote:
In aus.bicycle on 15 Mar 2007 05:56:31 -0700 Bleve wrote: There's a number of options. Cyclecover is a good one, I believe, basically it's home contents insurance that covers bikes while being ridden (and with a sircharge, while being raced). Bicycle Victoria has insurance (excess is $1000, which is hidden deep in the fine print, be aware ...) which is also like car insurance - 3rd party property as well as your own bike, but AFAIK, not while racing. The BV insurance isn't restricted to Victoria, if I recall correctly. Sure it covers the bike? That's interesting because the BNSW insurance doesn't.... I think so, yes. I'd have to double check to be sure, but the details are all here : www.bv.com.au |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
insurance
Zebee Johnstone Wrote: I tried a contents insurance quote from them. Was twice my current quote, and that made it somethign like 10% of the bike's value. Makes me wonder what the risk profile looks like... are they just making money from a credulous audience, or do insurance companies reckon bikes get totalled too often, or in such circumstances that it's not worth the business? My guess is that most of them class it as "used on the road therefore related to car crash stats but they don't have VIN markings, and you can't panelbeat them but must always replace, not worth it." ZebeeThey do seem to have a monopoly in this particular market (bicycle racing cover) ... it would be interesting to see what the introduction of a competitor would do to their pricing. (That said, I'd be surprised if they were making a killing in today's environment, but that's my guess only, and a lengthy bow to draw at that. Like you, I'd be curious as to what their claims experience has actually been.) -- RobM |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
insurance
Bleve wrote:
(and with a sircharge, while being raced). Is there a madamcharge for the ladies? :-) Theo |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
insurance
DaveB Wrote: RobM wrote: Hell that takes me back to when I bought my first decent motorbike, where the bank required compulsory full comprehensive which was around 25% of the bike value. DaveBYou're lucky. My premium from memory was $1000 for $1700 cover. But then, stepping from a 175 to a 900 straight of my P plates it was probably a pretty fair assesment of the risk. -- MalP |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Insurance? | Steve Hodgson | UK | 10 | October 6th 06 08:06 PM |
insurance | bugbear | UK | 3 | July 24th 06 02:51 PM |
Insurance (oh no, not again) | Zog The Undeniable | UK | 6 | May 4th 05 09:41 AM |
Insurance......?? | Simon Hawthorne | UK | 12 | December 14th 03 01:26 PM |
Insurance | Colin Blackburn | UK | 12 | October 10th 03 11:48 AM |