|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Another thieving scumbag motorist
Doug wrote:
nothing about UK cyclists (once again) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Another thieving scumbag motorist
On 1 Sep, 09:19, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
Doug wrote: nothing about UK cyclists (once again) Wrong again. Obviously the threat from motorists is of very great concern to cyclists in general. So any example of dangerous or criminal behaviour by motorists is perfectly on topic in this NG. -- . UK Radical Campaigns. http://www.zing.icom43.net A driving licence is a licence to kill. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Another thieving scumbag motorist
On 04/09/2010 07:58, Doug wrote:
On 1 Sep, 09:19, wrote: Doug wrote: nothing about UK cyclists (once again) Wrong again. Obviously the threat from motorists is of very great concern to cyclists in general. So any example of dangerous or criminal behaviour by motorists is perfectly on topic in this NG. -- . UK Radical Campaigns. http://www.zing.icom43.net A driving licence is a licence to kill. Why are you not posting to the equestrian NG's? http://www.austriantimes.at/news/Gen...to_horse_rider -- Tony Dragon |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Another thieving scumbag motorist
On 4 Sep, 09:01, Tony Dragon wrote:
On 04/09/2010 07:58, Doug wrote: On 1 Sep, 09:19, *wrote: Doug wrote: nothing about UK cyclists (once again) Wrong again. Obviously the threat from motorists is of very great concern to cyclists in general. So any example of dangerous or criminal behaviour by motorists *is perfectly on topic in this NG. Why are you not posting to the equestrian NG's? http://www.austriantimes.at/news/Gen...9/26136/Cyclis... Because there is no evidence of anti-cyclist equestrians posting to this cycling newsgroup, as there are plenty of anti-cyclist motorists posting here.. -- . UK Radical Campaigns. http://www.zing.icom43.net A driving licence is a licence to kill. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Another thieving scumbag motorist
On 05/09/2010 08:03, Doug wrote:
On 4 Sep, 09:01, Tony wrote: On 04/09/2010 07:58, Doug wrote: On 1 Sep, 09:19, wrote: Doug wrote: nothing about UK cyclists (once again) Wrong again. Obviously the threat from motorists is of very great concern to cyclists in general. So any example of dangerous or criminal behaviour by motorists is perfectly on topic in this NG. Why are you not posting to the equestrian NG's? http://www.austriantimes.at/news/Gen...9/26136/Cyclis... Because there is no evidence of anti-cyclist equestrians posting to this cycling newsgroup, as there are plenty of anti-cyclist motorists posting here.. -- . UK Radical Campaigns. http://www.zing.icom43.net A driving licence is a licence to kill. With one or two exceptions, there are no anti-cyclists posting to this NG. There are people who are anti, law breaking, anti social cyclist who post here. -- Tony Dragon |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Another thieving scumbag motorist
On 05/09/2010 09:09, Tony Dragon wrote:
On 05/09/2010 08:03, Doug wrote: On 4 Sep, 09:01, Tony wrote: On 04/09/2010 07:58, Doug wrote: On 1 Sep, 09:19, wrote: Doug wrote: nothing about UK cyclists (once again) Wrong again. Obviously the threat from motorists is of very great concern to cyclists in general. So any example of dangerous or criminal behaviour by motorists is perfectly on topic in this NG. Why are you not posting to the equestrian NG's? http://www.austriantimes.at/news/Gen...9/26136/Cyclis... Because there is no evidence of anti-cyclist equestrians posting to this cycling newsgroup, as there are plenty of anti-cyclist motorists posting here.. -- . UK Radical Campaigns. http://www.zing.icom43.net A driving licence is a licence to kill. With one or two exceptions, there are no anti-cyclists posting to this NG. There are people who are anti, law breaking, anti social cyclist who post here. Quite so. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Another thieving scumbag motorist
On 5 Sep, 09:09, Tony Dragon wrote:
On 05/09/2010 08:03, Doug wrote: On 4 Sep, 09:01, Tony *wrote: On 04/09/2010 07:58, Doug wrote: On 1 Sep, 09:19, * *wrote: Doug wrote: nothing about UK cyclists (once again) Wrong again. Obviously the threat from motorists is of very great concern to cyclists in general. So any example of dangerous or criminal behaviour by motorists *is perfectly on topic in this NG. Why are you not posting to the equestrian NG's? http://www.austriantimes.at/news/Gen...9/26136/Cyclis.... Because there is no evidence of anti-cyclist equestrians posting to this cycling newsgroup, as there are plenty of anti-cyclist motorists posting here.. With one or two exceptions, there are no anti-cyclists posting to this NG.. There are people who are anti, law breaking, anti social cyclist who post here. The particular problem though is that most of them, who pretend to be cyclists here, do not report anti-law-breaking, anti-social motorists who do pose a serious danger to cyclists. In other words, their reporting is markedly unbalanced and is self- evidently anti-cyclist. -- . UK Radical Campaigns. http://www.zing.icom43.net A driving licence is a licence to kill. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Another thieving scumbag motorist
On 05/09/2010 08:03, Doug wrote:
On 4 Sep, 09:01, Tony wrote: On 04/09/2010 07:58, Doug wrote: On 1 Sep, 09:19, wrote: Doug wrote: nothing about UK cyclists (once again) Wrong again. Obviously the threat from motorists is of very great concern to cyclists in general. So any example of dangerous or criminal behaviour by motorists is perfectly on topic in this NG. Why are you not posting to the equestrian NG's? http://www.austriantimes.at/news/Gen...9/26136/Cyclis... Because there is no evidence of anti-cyclist equestrians posting to this cycling newsgroup, as there are plenty of anti-cyclist motorists posting here.. Maybe not *exactly* within your description, but there are plenty of people posting here complaining - as pedestrians (which most of us are most of the time) - of cyclists illegally cycling along footways. My chief complaint against that offence is as a pedestrian. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Another thieving scumbag motorist
On 05/09/2010 11:58, JNugent wrote:
On 05/09/2010 08:03, Doug wrote: On 4 Sep, 09:01, Tony wrote: On 04/09/2010 07:58, Doug wrote: On 1 Sep, 09:19, wrote: Doug wrote: nothing about UK cyclists (once again) Wrong again. Obviously the threat from motorists is of very great concern to cyclists in general. So any example of dangerous or criminal behaviour by motorists is perfectly on topic in this NG. Why are you not posting to the equestrian NG's? http://www.austriantimes.at/news/Gen...9/26136/Cyclis... Because there is no evidence of anti-cyclist equestrians posting to this cycling newsgroup, as there are plenty of anti-cyclist motorists posting here.. Maybe not *exactly* within your description, but there are plenty of people posting here complaining - as pedestrians (which most of us are most of the time) - of cyclists illegally cycling along footways. My chief complaint against that offence is as a pedestrian. Exactly, when I am nearly knocked over by a cyclist on the pavement, I am a pedestrian not a motorist. -- Tony Dragon |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Another thieving scumbag motorist
Doug wrote:
On 1 Sep, 09:19, "Mrcheerful" wrote: Doug wrote: nothing about UK cyclists (once again) Wrong again. Obviously the threat from motorists is of very great concern to cyclists in general. So any example of dangerous or criminal behaviour by motorists is perfectly on topic in this NG. was this report about a motorist robbing a cyclist? No? then it is OT |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
another thieving scumbag cyclist | Mrcheerful[_2_] | UK | 27 | September 7th 10 07:39 PM |
Another thieving scumbag motorist | Doug[_3_] | UK | 0 | September 1st 10 08:34 AM |
Thieving bastard | elyob | UK | 0 | December 13th 05 11:28 AM |
Ed Gin Dipshit, Bastard & Scumbag | Edward Dolan | Recumbent Biking | 1 | February 3rd 05 04:35 PM |
Thieving **??!!s | vernon.levy | UK | 29 | December 9th 03 11:43 PM |