Another thieving scumbag motorist

On 5 Sep, 09:09, Tony Dragon wrote:
On 05/09/2010 08:03, Doug wrote:



On 4 Sep, 09:01, Tony *wrote:
On 04/09/2010 07:58, Doug wrote:

On 1 Sep, 09:19, * *wrote:
Doug wrote:

nothing about UK cyclists
(once again)

Wrong again. Obviously the threat from motorists is of very great
concern to cyclists in general. So any example of dangerous or
criminal behaviour by motorists *is perfectly on topic in this NG.

Why are you not posting to the equestrian NG's?

http://www.austriantimes.at/news/Gen...9/26136/Cyclis....

Because there is no evidence of anti-cyclist equestrians posting to
this cycling newsgroup, as there are plenty of anti-cyclist motorists
posting here..


With one or two exceptions, there are no anti-cyclists posting to this NG..
There are people who are anti, law breaking, anti social cyclist who
post here.

The particular problem though is that most of them, who pretend to be
cyclists here, do not report anti-law-breaking, anti-social motorists
who do pose a serious danger to cyclists.

In other words, their reporting is markedly unbalanced and is self-
evidently anti-cyclist.

-- .
UK Radical Campaigns.
http://www.zing.icom43.net
A driving licence is a licence to kill.

On 11/09/2010 09:00, Doug wrote:
On 5 Sep, 09:09, Tony wrote:
On 05/09/2010 08:03, Doug wrote:



On 4 Sep, 09:01, Tony wrote:
On 04/09/2010 07:58, Doug wrote:

On 1 Sep, 09:19, wrote:
Doug wrote:

nothing about UK cyclists
(once again)

Wrong again. Obviously the threat from motorists is of very great
concern to cyclists in general. So any example of dangerous or
criminal behaviour by motorists is perfectly on topic in this NG.

Why are you not posting to the equestrian NG's?

http://www.austriantimes.at/news/Gen...9/26136/Cyclis...

Because there is no evidence of anti-cyclist equestrians posting to
this cycling newsgroup, as there are plenty of anti-cyclist motorists
posting here..


With one or two exceptions, there are no anti-cyclists posting to this NG.
There are people who are anti, law breaking, anti social cyclist who
post here.

The particular problem though is that most of them, who pretend to be
cyclists here, do not report anti-law-breaking, anti-social motorists
who do pose a serious danger to cyclists.

Perhaps because it is OT


In other words, their reporting is markedly unbalanced and is self-
evidently anti-cyclist.


Only in your blinkered mind.

-- .
UK Radical Campaigns.
http://www.zing.icom43.net
A driving licence is a licence to kill.



--
Tony Dragon

On 11 Sep, 10:14, Tony Dragon wrote:
On 11/09/2010 09:00, Doug wrote:



On 5 Sep, 09:09, Tony *wrote:
On 05/09/2010 08:03, Doug wrote:

On 4 Sep, 09:01, Tony * *wrote:
On 04/09/2010 07:58, Doug wrote:

On 1 Sep, 09:19, * * *wrote:
Doug wrote:

nothing about UK cyclists
(once again)

Wrong again. Obviously the threat from motorists is of very great
concern to cyclists in general. So any example of dangerous or
criminal behaviour by motorists *is perfectly on topic in this NG..

Why are you not posting to the equestrian NG's?

http://www.austriantimes.at/news/Gen...9/26136/Cyclis....

Because there is no evidence of anti-cyclist equestrians posting to
this cycling newsgroup, as there are plenty of anti-cyclist motorists
posting here..

With one or two exceptions, there are no anti-cyclists posting to this NG.
There are people who are anti, law breaking, anti social cyclist who
post here.

The particular problem though is that most of them, who pretend to be
cyclists here, do not report anti-law-breaking, anti-social motorists
who do pose a serious danger to cyclists.

Perhaps because it is OT

How can something which represents a serious danger to cyclists be OT?


In other words, their reporting is markedly unbalanced and is self-
evidently anti-cyclist.

Only in your blinkered mind.

No you have only to look at all the anti-cyclist thread titles to see
I am right.

-- .
UK Radical Campaigns.
http://www.zing.icom43.net
A driving licence is a licence to kill.