A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Techniques
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their own viciousness?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old March 11th 20, 03:43 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Tom Kunich[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,318
Default Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their own viciousness?

On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 2:13:05 AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
Incredibly, in a thread headlined "Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their own viciousness?" John B. Slocomb is rolling around in his own vicious drool:

On Tuesday, March 10, 2020 at 10:43:29 PM UTC, John B. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:55:32 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
wrote:

Now it is your memory that is failing you.


No Tommy, it isn't. It is just you telling lies again.

I'm still a bit undecided just why you tell lies. Whether it is simply
because you are ignorant? Or maybe, like your lord and master, the guy
with the blond comb-over, you lie to inflate your ego, or perhaps is
just the "crazy pills" that you take.

But for whatever reason you lie!
--
cheers,

John B.


Not only that but he actually thinks that I would read more than a sentence out of his bull****. Normally I don't read him at all except for the stuff that people have quoted. He doesn't even know that the military had changed to the .308 when newer forms of faster burning (more powerful) powder were developed. He just keeps getting into it deeper and deeper. A 30-06 has a bullet diameter of .308".
Ads
  #22  
Old March 12th 20, 12:07 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
jOHN b.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,421
Default Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their own viciousness?

On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:43:58 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
wrote:

On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 2:13:05 AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
Incredibly, in a thread headlined "Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their own viciousness?" John B. Slocomb is rolling around in his own vicious drool:

On Tuesday, March 10, 2020 at 10:43:29 PM UTC, John B. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:55:32 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
wrote:

Now it is your memory that is failing you.

No Tommy, it isn't. It is just you telling lies again.

I'm still a bit undecided just why you tell lies. Whether it is simply
because you are ignorant? Or maybe, like your lord and master, the guy
with the blond comb-over, you lie to inflate your ego, or perhaps is
just the "crazy pills" that you take.

But for whatever reason you lie!
--
cheers,

John B.


Not only that but he actually thinks that I would read more than a sentence out of his bull****. Normally I don't read him at all except for the stuff that people have quoted. He doesn't even know that the military had changed to the .308 when newer forms of faster burning (more powerful) powder were developed. He just keeps getting into it deeper and deeper. A 30-06 has a bullet diameter of .308".


Goodness Gracious! Are you really sure? Can it be?

But of course the 30-06 has a bullet diameter of .308 inches... But
then, the 20-40 Krag, which is properly called the ".30 Army" used a
..308 bullet. Adopted by the U.S. Army in 1894, the first cartridge
adopted by the US Army that was specifically designed for smokeless
powder.

Then we have the M1A1 carbine that had a .308 bullet diameter, and
the 30-30, once a common "deer rifle", and the .300 Savage, which my
father preferred, and the .300 Remington Magnum and the 300 Remington
Short Action Magnum, and the 300 Weatherby Magnum, and, and, and.

There are at least 20 different cartridges that all use a .308" bullet
diameter.

You ignorant oaf.
--
cheers,

John B.

  #23  
Old March 28th 20, 06:13 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
James McKinley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their own viciousness?

On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 7:07:19 PM UTC-4, John B. wrote:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:43:58 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
wrote:

On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 2:13:05 AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
Incredibly, in a thread headlined "Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their own viciousness?" John B. Slocomb is rolling around in his own vicious drool:

On Tuesday, March 10, 2020 at 10:43:29 PM UTC, John B. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:55:32 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
wrote:

Now it is your memory that is failing you.

No Tommy, it isn't. It is just you telling lies again.

I'm still a bit undecided just why you tell lies. Whether it is simply
because you are ignorant? Or maybe, like your lord and master, the guy
with the blond comb-over, you lie to inflate your ego, or perhaps is
just the "crazy pills" that you take.

But for whatever reason you lie!
--
cheers,

John B.


Not only that but he actually thinks that I would read more than a sentence out of his bull****. Normally I don't read him at all except for the stuff that people have quoted. He doesn't even know that the military had changed to the .308 when newer forms of faster burning (more powerful) powder were developed. He just keeps getting into it deeper and deeper. A 30-06 has a bullet diameter of .308".


Goodness Gracious! Are you really sure? Can it be?

But of course the 30-06 has a bullet diameter of .308 inches... But
then, the 20-40 Krag, which is properly called the ".30 Army" used a
.308 bullet. Adopted by the U.S. Army in 1894, the first cartridge
adopted by the US Army that was specifically designed for smokeless
powder.

Then we have the M1A1 carbine that had a .308 bullet diameter, and
the 30-30, once a common "deer rifle", and the .300 Savage, which my
father preferred, and the .300 Remington Magnum and the 300 Remington
Short Action Magnum, and the 300 Weatherby Magnum, and, and, and.

There are at least 20 different cartridges that all use a .308" bullet
diameter.

You ignorant oaf.
--
cheers,

John B.


I've read through this whole name-calling exchange and there's at least one thing I don't understand: what is RBT?
  #24  
Old March 28th 20, 12:26 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
news18
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,131
Default Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their ownviciousness?

On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 22:13:05 -0700, James McKinley wrote:



I've read through this whole name-calling exchange and there's at least
one thing I don't understand: what is RBT?


Roadside Breath Testing but they usually ignore the bicyclists unless you
wobble a lt.

  #25  
Old March 28th 20, 02:32 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
AMuzi
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13,447
Default Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their own viciousness?

On 3/28/2020 12:13 AM, James McKinley wrote:
On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 7:07:19 PM UTC-4, John B. wrote:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:43:58 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
wrote:
On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 2:13:05 AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
On Tuesday, March 10, 2020 at 10:43:29 PM UTC, John B. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:55:32 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
wrote:


-snippy snip snip-

I've read through this whole name-calling exchange and there's at least one thing I don't understand: what is RBT?


It is The Center of The Universe!

rec.bicycles.tech

--
Andrew Muzi
www.yellowjersey.org/
Open every day since 1 April, 1971


  #26  
Old March 29th 20, 07:15 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Tom Kunich[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,318
Default Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their own viciousness?

On Friday, March 27, 2020 at 10:13:10 PM UTC-7, AnotherJim wrote:
On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 7:07:19 PM UTC-4, John B. wrote:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:43:58 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
wrote:

On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 2:13:05 AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
Incredibly, in a thread headlined "Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their own viciousness?" John B. Slocomb is rolling around in his own vicious drool:

On Tuesday, March 10, 2020 at 10:43:29 PM UTC, John B. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:55:32 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
wrote:

Now it is your memory that is failing you.

No Tommy, it isn't. It is just you telling lies again.

I'm still a bit undecided just why you tell lies. Whether it is simply
because you are ignorant? Or maybe, like your lord and master, the guy
with the blond comb-over, you lie to inflate your ego, or perhaps is
just the "crazy pills" that you take.

But for whatever reason you lie!
--
cheers,

John B.

Not only that but he actually thinks that I would read more than a sentence out of his bull****. Normally I don't read him at all except for the stuff that people have quoted. He doesn't even know that the military had changed to the .308 when newer forms of faster burning (more powerful) powder were developed. He just keeps getting into it deeper and deeper. A 30-06 has a bullet diameter of .308".


Goodness Gracious! Are you really sure? Can it be?

But of course the 30-06 has a bullet diameter of .308 inches... But
then, the 20-40 Krag, which is properly called the ".30 Army" used a
.308 bullet. Adopted by the U.S. Army in 1894, the first cartridge
adopted by the US Army that was specifically designed for smokeless
powder.

Then we have the M1A1 carbine that had a .308 bullet diameter, and
the 30-30, once a common "deer rifle", and the .300 Savage, which my
father preferred, and the .300 Remington Magnum and the 300 Remington
Short Action Magnum, and the 300 Weatherby Magnum, and, and, and.

There are at least 20 different cartridges that all use a .308" bullet
diameter.

You ignorant oaf.
--
cheers,

John B.


I've read through this whole name-calling exchange and there's at least one thing I don't understand: what is RBT?


What you have unfortunately witnessed in this group is the fact that those that know bicycle mechanics generally have few questions about it and most of those who don't know bicycle technology prefer to turn this group into a garbage pit of their opinions.

  #27  
Old March 30th 20, 01:02 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Frank Krygowski[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,538
Default Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their own viciousness?

On 3/29/2020 2:15 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Friday, March 27, 2020 at 10:13:10 PM UTC-7, AnotherJim wrote:
On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 7:07:19 PM UTC-4, John B. wrote:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:43:58 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
wrote:

On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 2:13:05 AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
Incredibly, in a thread headlined "Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their own viciousness?" John B. Slocomb is rolling around in his own vicious drool:

On Tuesday, March 10, 2020 at 10:43:29 PM UTC, John B. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:55:32 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
wrote:

Now it is your memory that is failing you.

No Tommy, it isn't. It is just you telling lies again.

I'm still a bit undecided just why you tell lies. Whether it is simply
because you are ignorant? Or maybe, like your lord and master, the guy
with the blond comb-over, you lie to inflate your ego, or perhaps is
just the "crazy pills" that you take.

But for whatever reason you lie!
--
cheers,

John B.

Not only that but he actually thinks that I would read more than a sentence out of his bull****. Normally I don't read him at all except for the stuff that people have quoted. He doesn't even know that the military had changed to the .308 when newer forms of faster burning (more powerful) powder were developed. He just keeps getting into it deeper and deeper. A 30-06 has a bullet diameter of .308".

Goodness Gracious! Are you really sure? Can it be?

But of course the 30-06 has a bullet diameter of .308 inches... But
then, the 20-40 Krag, which is properly called the ".30 Army" used a
.308 bullet. Adopted by the U.S. Army in 1894, the first cartridge
adopted by the US Army that was specifically designed for smokeless
powder.

Then we have the M1A1 carbine that had a .308 bullet diameter, and
the 30-30, once a common "deer rifle", and the .300 Savage, which my
father preferred, and the .300 Remington Magnum and the 300 Remington
Short Action Magnum, and the 300 Weatherby Magnum, and, and, and.

There are at least 20 different cartridges that all use a .308" bullet
diameter.

You ignorant oaf.
--
cheers,

John B.


I've read through this whole name-calling exchange and there's at least one thing I don't understand: what is RBT?


What you have unfortunately witnessed in this group is the fact that those that know bicycle mechanics generally have few questions about it and most of those who don't know bicycle technology prefer to turn this group into a garbage pit of their opinions.


:-) That was posted by the guy who required a dozen posts and maybe two
weeks to install a bottom bracket. And I won't even try to recall all
his confusion about Di2!


--
- Frank Krygowski
  #28  
Old March 30th 20, 01:18 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Sir Ridesalot
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,270
Default Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their own viciousness?

On Sunday, 29 March 2020 20:02:22 UTC-4, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 3/29/2020 2:15 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Friday, March 27, 2020 at 10:13:10 PM UTC-7, AnotherJim wrote:
On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 7:07:19 PM UTC-4, John B. wrote:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:43:58 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
wrote:

On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 2:13:05 AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
Incredibly, in a thread headlined "Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their own viciousness?" John B. Slocomb is rolling around in his own vicious drool:

On Tuesday, March 10, 2020 at 10:43:29 PM UTC, John B. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:55:32 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
wrote:

Now it is your memory that is failing you.

No Tommy, it isn't. It is just you telling lies again.

I'm still a bit undecided just why you tell lies. Whether it is simply
because you are ignorant? Or maybe, like your lord and master, the guy
with the blond comb-over, you lie to inflate your ego, or perhaps is
just the "crazy pills" that you take.

But for whatever reason you lie!
--
cheers,

John B.

Not only that but he actually thinks that I would read more than a sentence out of his bull****. Normally I don't read him at all except for the stuff that people have quoted. He doesn't even know that the military had changed to the .308 when newer forms of faster burning (more powerful) powder were developed. He just keeps getting into it deeper and deeper. A 30-06 has a bullet diameter of .308".

Goodness Gracious! Are you really sure? Can it be?

But of course the 30-06 has a bullet diameter of .308 inches... But
then, the 20-40 Krag, which is properly called the ".30 Army" used a
.308 bullet. Adopted by the U.S. Army in 1894, the first cartridge
adopted by the US Army that was specifically designed for smokeless
powder.

Then we have the M1A1 carbine that had a .308 bullet diameter, and
the 30-30, once a common "deer rifle", and the .300 Savage, which my
father preferred, and the .300 Remington Magnum and the 300 Remington
Short Action Magnum, and the 300 Weatherby Magnum, and, and, and.

There are at least 20 different cartridges that all use a .308" bullet
diameter.

You ignorant oaf.
--
cheers,

John B.

I've read through this whole name-calling exchange and there's at least one thing I don't understand: what is RBT?


What you have unfortunately witnessed in this group is the fact that those that know bicycle mechanics generally have few questions about it and most of those who don't know bicycle technology prefer to turn this group into a garbage pit of their opinions.


:-) That was posted by the guy who required a dozen posts and maybe two
weeks to install a bottom bracket. And I won't even try to recall all
his confusion about Di2!


--
- Frank Krygowski


LOL! talks about the pot calling the kettle black!

Cheers
  #29  
Old March 30th 20, 02:25 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
jOHN b.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,421
Default Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their own viciousness?

On Sun, 29 Mar 2020 17:18:02 -0700 (PDT), Sir Ridesalot
wrote:

On Sunday, 29 March 2020 20:02:22 UTC-4, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 3/29/2020 2:15 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Friday, March 27, 2020 at 10:13:10 PM UTC-7, AnotherJim wrote:
On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 7:07:19 PM UTC-4, John B. wrote:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:43:58 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
wrote:

On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 2:13:05 AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
Incredibly, in a thread headlined "Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their own viciousness?" John B. Slocomb is rolling around in his own vicious drool:

On Tuesday, March 10, 2020 at 10:43:29 PM UTC, John B. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:55:32 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
wrote:

Now it is your memory that is failing you.

No Tommy, it isn't. It is just you telling lies again.

I'm still a bit undecided just why you tell lies. Whether it is simply
because you are ignorant? Or maybe, like your lord and master, the guy
with the blond comb-over, you lie to inflate your ego, or perhaps is
just the "crazy pills" that you take.

But for whatever reason you lie!
--
cheers,

John B.

Not only that but he actually thinks that I would read more than a sentence out of his bull****. Normally I don't read him at all except for the stuff that people have quoted. He doesn't even know that the military had changed to the .308 when newer forms of faster burning (more powerful) powder were developed. He just keeps getting into it deeper and deeper. A 30-06 has a bullet diameter of .308".

Goodness Gracious! Are you really sure? Can it be?

But of course the 30-06 has a bullet diameter of .308 inches... But
then, the 20-40 Krag, which is properly called the ".30 Army" used a
.308 bullet. Adopted by the U.S. Army in 1894, the first cartridge
adopted by the US Army that was specifically designed for smokeless
powder.

Then we have the M1A1 carbine that had a .308 bullet diameter, and
the 30-30, once a common "deer rifle", and the .300 Savage, which my
father preferred, and the .300 Remington Magnum and the 300 Remington
Short Action Magnum, and the 300 Weatherby Magnum, and, and, and.

There are at least 20 different cartridges that all use a .308" bullet
diameter.

You ignorant oaf.
--
cheers,

John B.

I've read through this whole name-calling exchange and there's at least one thing I don't understand: what is RBT?

What you have unfortunately witnessed in this group is the fact that those that know bicycle mechanics generally have few questions about it and most of those who don't know bicycle technology prefer to turn this group into a garbage pit of their opinions.


:-) That was posted by the guy who required a dozen posts and maybe two
weeks to install a bottom bracket. And I won't even try to recall all
his confusion about Di2!


--
- Frank Krygowski


LOL! talks about the pot calling the kettle black!

Cheers


What! Frank has switched to electric shifting?
(what is the world coming to?)
--
cheers,

John B.

  #30  
Old March 30th 20, 02:43 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Frank Krygowski[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,538
Default Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their ownviciousness?

On 3/29/2020 9:25 PM, John B. wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2020 17:18:02 -0700 (PDT), Sir Ridesalot
wrote:

On Sunday, 29 March 2020 20:02:22 UTC-4, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 3/29/2020 2:15 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Friday, March 27, 2020 at 10:13:10 PM UTC-7, AnotherJim wrote:
On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 7:07:19 PM UTC-4, John B. wrote:
On Wed, 11 Mar 2020 07:43:58 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
wrote:

On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 2:13:05 AM UTC-7, Andre Jute wrote:
Incredibly, in a thread headlined "Who makes RBT slimy underfoot by drooling at their own viciousness?" John B. Slocomb is rolling around in his own vicious drool:

On Tuesday, March 10, 2020 at 10:43:29 PM UTC, John B. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:55:32 -0700 (PDT), Tom Kunich
wrote:

Now it is your memory that is failing you.

No Tommy, it isn't. It is just you telling lies again.

I'm still a bit undecided just why you tell lies. Whether it is simply
because you are ignorant? Or maybe, like your lord and master, the guy
with the blond comb-over, you lie to inflate your ego, or perhaps is
just the "crazy pills" that you take.

But for whatever reason you lie!
--
cheers,

John B.

Not only that but he actually thinks that I would read more than a sentence out of his bull****. Normally I don't read him at all except for the stuff that people have quoted. He doesn't even know that the military had changed to the .308 when newer forms of faster burning (more powerful) powder were developed. He just keeps getting into it deeper and deeper. A 30-06 has a bullet diameter of .308".

Goodness Gracious! Are you really sure? Can it be?

But of course the 30-06 has a bullet diameter of .308 inches... But
then, the 20-40 Krag, which is properly called the ".30 Army" used a
.308 bullet. Adopted by the U.S. Army in 1894, the first cartridge
adopted by the US Army that was specifically designed for smokeless
powder.

Then we have the M1A1 carbine that had a .308 bullet diameter, and
the 30-30, once a common "deer rifle", and the .300 Savage, which my
father preferred, and the .300 Remington Magnum and the 300 Remington
Short Action Magnum, and the 300 Weatherby Magnum, and, and, and.

There are at least 20 different cartridges that all use a .308" bullet
diameter.

You ignorant oaf.
--
cheers,

John B.

I've read through this whole name-calling exchange and there's at least one thing I don't understand: what is RBT?

What you have unfortunately witnessed in this group is the fact that those that know bicycle mechanics generally have few questions about it and most of those who don't know bicycle technology prefer to turn this group into a garbage pit of their opinions.

:-) That was posted by the guy who required a dozen posts and maybe two
weeks to install a bottom bracket. And I won't even try to recall all
his confusion about Di2!


--
- Frank Krygowski


LOL! talks about the pot calling the kettle black!

Cheers


What! Frank has switched to electric shifting?
(what is the world coming to?)


I don't know what Sir is mis-remembering. Yes, I did two bottom brackets
last week. No, unlike Tom, I didn't require repeated questions here to
figure out how to do the job. I did the job, then mentioned it afterward.

So far, I've had absolutely zero problems with Di2. I have a foolproof
method for avoiding Di2 problems! ;-)

--
- Frank Krygowski
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
About the thief Peter Howard and his slimy fellow travellers Andre Jute[_2_] Techniques 11 March 23rd 11 11:01 PM
A Toyota makes you dumb; a bicycle makes you smart SMS Recumbent Biking 3 April 21st 10 01:41 AM
A Toyota makes you dumb; a bicycle makes you smart SMS Recumbent Biking 2 April 20th 10 11:53 PM
So we were drooling over the 09 Kona catalog as I stopped by the LBSfor coffee landotter Techniques 62 September 7th 08 02:36 AM
BikeE? (was: So we were drooling over the 09 Kona catalog as I stoppedby the LBS for coffee) Tom Sherman[_2_] Recumbent Biking 18 September 6th 08 02:16 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.