Bribed drug test lab workers, says Kohl

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/kohl...r-bribed-anti-
doping-labs

Money talks. Ingenious way to subvert The System. --D-y

--D-y wrote:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/kohl...ti-doping-labs
Money talks. Ingenious way to subvert The System.

Bribed is a big word. He didn't pay them for a negative result of an
official sample, he paid to get his own samples tested privately. I
think even for a non-doper €150 would be good investment for having that
done. Have some reference material to keep those damn Froggy lab techs
honest.

On Aug 15, 10:40*am, Susan Walker
wrote:
--D-y wrote:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/kohl...ribed-anti-dop...
Money talks. Ingenious way to subvert The System.

Bribed is a big word. He didn't pay them for a negative result of an
official sample, he paid to get his own samples tested privately. I
think even for a non-doper €150 would be good investment for having that
done. Have some reference material to keep those damn Froggy lab techs
honest.

Susan, you seem like a reasonable and intelligent well balanced person
---- perhaps the only one in RBR. (that's sincere)

But do you honestly believe that any of these cats are clean?

Anton Berlin wrote:
On Aug 15, 10:40 am, Susan Walker wrote:
Bribed is a big word. He didn't pay them for a negative result of an
official sample, he paid to get his own samples tested privately. I
think even for a non-doper €150 would be good investment for having that
done. Have some reference material to keep those damn Froggy lab techs
honest.

Susan, you seem like a reasonable and intelligent well balanced person
---- perhaps the only one in RBR. (that's sincere)

Nonono, there's always Carl, Ben and Ryan to precede me. At least they
are balanced enough to use their real names.

But do you honestly believe that any of these cats are clean?

Sure, some of them, maybe even up to a third of all riders.

Susan Walker wrote:

Bribed is a big word. He didn't pay them for a negative result of an
official sample, he paid to get his own samples tested privately. I
think even for a non-doper ¤150 would be good investment for having that
done. Have some reference material to keep those damn Froggy lab techs
honest.

That last one is quite a good idea, if you do it more than one time or
twice. The only different thing is that Kohl used the results to keep is
his doping use hidden within the limits.

--
Dolfy
- naaisgroep : alt.dolfy.forever
- Westfrieske zaitte :
- Zô drok as 'n kìp mit ien pul

Dolfy wrote:
Susan Walker wrote:

Bribed is a big word. He didn't pay them for a negative result of an
official sample, he paid to get his own samples tested privately. I
think even for a non-doper ¤150 would be good investment for having that
done. Have some reference material to keep those damn Froggy lab techs
honest.

That last one is quite a good idea, if you do it more than one time or
twice. The only different thing is that Kohl used the results to keep is
his doping use hidden within the limits.


That's the thing: to find out the edge where your dosing won't be
detected, you'll have to do multiple tests. In essence building up your
own personal, private biological passport.

On Aug 15, 10:40*am, Susan Walker
wrote:
--D-y wrote:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/kohl...ribed-anti-dop...
Money talks. Ingenious way to subvert The System.

Bribed is a big word. He didn't pay them for a negative result of an
official sample, he paid to get his own samples tested privately. I
think even for a non-doper €150 would be good investment for having that
done. Have some reference material to keep those damn Froggy lab techs
honest.

Um, "bribed" was the word in the story used to describe payment to the
lab workers, along with "forbidden", "illegal" used to describe the
tests themselves. Since these tests were obviously intended to break
such laws and rules forbidding "sporting fraud" (by whatever name) and
"doping" in general, he (Matschiner) didn't exactly walk in the front
door, samples in hand, credit card at the ready.

Why the wiggle, Susan? --D-y

--D-y wrote:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/kohl...r-bribed-anti-
doping-labs

Money talks. Ingenious way to subvert The System. --D-y

Dumbasses,

Voet describes taking a course of clenbuterol and submitting
samples for testing until they came back negative. This is
old skool stuff, except in Voet's case they were able to
determine the detection window without subjecting the riders
to any risk.

Bob Schwartz

In article
,
--D-y wrote:

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/kohl...r-bribed-anti-
doping-labs

Money talks. Ingenious way to subvert The System. --D-y

I like "illegally tested samples".
Is Kohl still talking? In a sane
world there would be a contract
out on him.

--
Michael Press

Bob Schwartz wrote:

--D-y wrote:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/kohl...r-bribed-anti-
doping-labs

Money talks. Ingenious way to subvert The System. --D-y

Dumbasses,

Voet describes taking a course of clenbuterol and submitting
samples for testing until they came back negative. This is
old skool stuff, except in Voet's case they were able to
determine the detection window without subjecting the riders
to any risk.

Bob Schwartz

clenbuterol = asthma = cheaters