Tyler--Lance Run In Post-60 Minutes

On Jun 13, 7:26*am, BL wrote:

Marco, the idea is to factually educate the Lance fanboys here on rbr.
Cheers.

BL, of the regular posters here, who do you think qualifies as a LA
"fanboy"? Even Mike J. makes it clear that he thinks LA is a doper. I
think LA's a doper, everyone I know here thinks he's a doper, too. I
don't see much support for him here. Only thing I see are a lot of
people who think that LA isn't the anti-Christ, aren't obsessed with
his prosecution, and think that even if he's tossed into a supermax
that a large number of pro cyclists will continue to dope unabated.

Who are you trying to "educate" with this stuff that we all have read
and know?

On Jun 13, 8:26*am, BL wrote:
On 6/12/2011 11:28 PM, Marco wrote:



On Jun 12, 1:11 pm, *wrote:
Tyler was in town to host a ride for the Outside in Aspen. It was
organized by Outside magazine. There was a bunch of people from Outside
magazine in the bar watching it unfold. Tyler actually tried to give
Lance the bro-hug and lance brushed him off. Tyler didn't take it that
well, was shook up by it.http://forum.cyclingnews.com/showthr...12137&page=265

http://twitter.com/#!/GraysonSchaffer

Also, it seems that Haven's new boyfriend is also Levi's new lawyer.
Small world.

What I don't really get is why you think it's necessary to parrot back
to rbr things you learn from lurking twiiter accounts or in the cn
clinic. It's particularly lame when you are "reporting" things that
have been known by many/most for a long time. And even if not widely
known, do you really think people here care? What is your point? Did
you see yourself clearly in Papp's comment in the PZ thread about the
strange people who get so emotionally invested in this scenario when
it has practically zero impact on their lives? Serious question... how
many hours do you think you have spent on the internet reading or
writing about Lance's doping? (I guess I don't really expect you will
answer that.)

Marco, the idea is to factually educate the Lance fanboys here on rbr.
Cheers.

Yeah, 'cause we'd never see those factual articles if you didn't post
the links. Thank you, you are a godsend.

On 6/13/2011 11:14 AM, Brad Anders wrote:
On Jun 13, 7:26 am, wrote:

Marco, the idea is to factually educate the Lance fanboys here on rbr.
Cheers.

BL, of the regular posters here, who do you think qualifies as a LA
"fanboy"? Even Mike J. makes it clear that he thinks LA is a doper. I
think LA's a doper, everyone I know here thinks he's a doper, too. I
don't see much support for him here. Only thing I see are a lot of
people who think that LA isn't the anti-Christ, aren't obsessed with
his prosecution, and think that even if he's tossed into a supermax
that a large number of pro cyclists will continue to dope unabated.

Who are you trying to "educate" with this stuff that we all have read
and know?
You can accept that Armstrong is a doper and still be a fanboy. There
are very few posters here at rbr anymore who aren't fanboys, Brad. ;-)

On 6/13/2011 11:14 AM, Scott wrote:
On Jun 13, 8:26 am, wrote:
On 6/12/2011 11:28 PM, Marco wrote:



On Jun 12, 1:11 pm, wrote:
Tyler was in town to host a ride for the Outside in Aspen. It was
organized by Outside magazine. There was a bunch of people from Outside
magazine in the bar watching it unfold. Tyler actually tried to give
Lance the bro-hug and lance brushed him off. Tyler didn't take it that
well, was shook up by it.http://forum.cyclingnews.com/showthr...12137&page=265

http://twitter.com/#!/GraysonSchaffer

Also, it seems that Haven's new boyfriend is also Levi's new lawyer.
Small world.

What I don't really get is why you think it's necessary to parrot back
to rbr things you learn from lurking twiiter accounts or in the cn
clinic. It's particularly lame when you are "reporting" things that
have been known by many/most for a long time. And even if not widely
known, do you really think people here care? What is your point? Did
you see yourself clearly in Papp's comment in the PZ thread about the
strange people who get so emotionally invested in this scenario when
it has practically zero impact on their lives? Serious question... how
many hours do you think you have spent on the internet reading or
writing about Lance's doping? (I guess I don't really expect you will
answer that.)

Marco, the idea is to factually educate the Lance fanboys here on rbr.
Cheers.

Yeah, 'cause we'd never see those factual articles if you didn't post
the links. Thank you, you are a godsend.

You're more than welcome.

On 6/13/2011 10:27 AM, BL wrote:
On 6/13/2011 11:14 AM, Brad Anders wrote:
On Jun 13, 7:26 am, wrote:

Marco, the idea is to factually educate the Lance fanboys here on rbr.
Cheers.

BL, of the regular posters here, who do you think qualifies as a LA
"fanboy"? Even Mike J. makes it clear that he thinks LA is a doper. I
think LA's a doper, everyone I know here thinks he's a doper, too. I
don't see much support for him here. Only thing I see are a lot of
people who think that LA isn't the anti-Christ, aren't obsessed with
his prosecution, and think that even if he's tossed into a supermax
that a large number of pro cyclists will continue to dope unabated.

Who are you trying to "educate" with this stuff that we all have read
and know?
You can accept that Armstrong is a doper and still be a fanboy. There
are very few posters here at rbr anymore who aren't fanboys, Brad. ;-)

Blowing off appeals to rational behavior is one of the foundations of
the 'bot code. There is no clearer signature.

I never should have open sourced it.

F

On Jun 13, 7:50*am, BL wrote:
http://www.velonation.com/News/ID/87...from-Aspen-res...

For the non-francophones, the restaurant's name "cache cache" means
"hide-and-seek".

On 6/13/2011 12:50 PM, William R. Mattil wrote:
On 6/13/2011 10:27 AM, BL wrote:

You can accept that Armstrong is a doper and still be a fanboy. There
are very few posters here at rbr anymore who aren't fanboys, Brad. ;-)


On a hunch I ran this through Babelfish in an attempt to get a
translation for it. Interesting ..............

What it means is that anyone not in favor of lynching LA and not
agreeing with Laff is a fanboi


Pretty broad brush there Brian.


Bill
Try again, Fanboy.

In article
,
Fredmaster of Brainerd wrote:

It's almost as if Lafferty wants a Twitter feed of his own
for his obsessions, but hasn't figured out how to sign up
for one, so he just tweets to us in rbr instead.

I'd sign him up myself except on Twitter Lafferty
cannot call his respondents ****tards.

--
Old Fritz

In article ,
BL wrote:

You can accept that Armstrong is a doper and still be a fanboy. There
are very few posters here at rbr anymore who aren't fanboys, Brad. ;-)

You can excoriate him regularly and be more obsessed
with him than any fanboy, and you do.

--
Old Fritz

In article ,
BL wrote:

http://www.velonation.com/News/ID/8736/Hamilton-...

Armstrong chases down Hamilton and ejects him from the breakaway.

--
Old Fritz