Police crackdown on danger cyclists in Cambridge

On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 07:26:57 -0800 (PST)
wrote:
On Mar 1, 3:14=A0pm, wrote:
Yet another feeble excuse.

You ever considered not constantly replying to your own posts or are you
just incapable of using a newsreader properly?

B2003

On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 15:41:51 +0000 (UTC), d wrote:

On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 07:26:57 -0800 (PST)
wrote:
On Mar 1, 3:14=A0pm, wrote:
Yet another feeble excuse.

You ever considered not constantly replying to your own posts or are you
just incapable of using a newsreader properly?

B2003




He is known as Simple Simon - no idea why.

On 01/03/2012 15:14, wrote:

Yet another feeble excuse.

QUOTE:
A motorist accused of causing the death through careless driving of
record-breaking cyclist Pat Kenny in January last year has told
Stafford Crown Court that he did not see the rider and may have been
blinded by the sun prior to the fatal incident on the slip road of the
A38 at Claymills near Burton-on-Trent.

The A38 at that point is a purpose built grade-separated bypass which is part
of a longer distance through route from the West Midlands to the northern
East Midlands (constructed in the days when Britain had its transport
priorities rather less wrong than it does today).

The original route through the centre of Burton (the "old A38") still exists
and there is no good reason to allow cycling on quasi-motorways when the old
route is available (which it almost always is). As a policy, it's crazy.

On Mar 1, 3:41*pm, wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 07:26:57 -0800 (PST)

wrote:
On Mar 1, 3:14=A0pm, wrote:
Yet another feeble excuse.

You ever considered not constantly replying to your own posts or are you
just incapable of using a newsreader properly?

B2003

We are having a bit of troll trouble in urc at the moment by someone
who insists on crossposting to multiple groups
Blame him.

--
Simon Mason

On Mar 1, 3:41*pm, wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 07:26:57 -0800 (PST)

wrote:
On Mar 1, 3:14=A0pm, wrote:
Yet another feeble excuse.

You ever considered not constantly replying to your own posts or are you
just incapable of using a newsreader properly?

B2003

That is rich coming from someone who cannot use a simple sig
separator.
--
Simon Mason

In article , Simon Mason wrote:
On Mar 1, 3:41*pm, wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 07:26:57 -0800 (PST)

wrote:
On Mar 1, 3:14=A0pm, wrote:
Yet another feeble excuse.

You ever considered not constantly replying to your own posts or are you
just incapable of using a newsreader properly?

We are having a bit of troll trouble in urc at the moment by someone
who insists on crossposting to multiple groups
Blame him.

Is he also forging posts from you, or are the multiple copies of replies
from you with untrimmed lists of groups your fault, not his?
Followup-To set.

(For those not familiar with the history, some of the trolls have been
forging posts, so this is not a rhetorical question.)

On Mar 2, 8:18*am, (Alan Braggins) wrote:
In article , Simon Mason wrote:
On Mar 1, 3:41*pm, wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 07:26:57 -0800 (PST)

wrote:
On Mar 1, 3:14=A0pm, wrote:
Yet another feeble excuse.

You ever considered not constantly replying to your own posts or are you
just incapable of using a newsreader properly?

We are having a bit of troll trouble in urc at the moment by someone
who insists on crossposting to multiple groups
Blame him.

Is he also forging posts from you, or are the multiple copies of replies
from you with untrimmed lists of groups your fault, not his?
Followup-To set.

(For those not familiar with the history, some of the trolls have been
forging posts, so this is not a rhetorical question.)

Nobody is forging my posts, apart from a few "Simple Simon" nymshifts
by JMS.
It is just my way of dealing with Benn's trolling - simply put, the
high level of my current activity is down to a relatively high level
of troll activity.
If they would desist on posting excessively and stop crossposting then
the problem would vanish.
But if they want to keep wasting their time posting trolling messages
then that just shows how stupid they all are.

BTW - "Judith" sent me a private e-mail to my home address last year
pretending to be you, but I saw through it.
It was actually very useful as it contained "her" IP address.

--
Simon Mason

--
Simon Mason

On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 00:32:30 -0800 (PST), Simon Mason
wrote:

snip


BTW - "Judith" sent me a private e-mail to my home address last year
pretending to be you, but I saw through it.
It was actually very useful as it contained "her" IP address.

--
Simon Mason



Oh really?

Why not post the email with the full headers so that everyone will be able to
believe you; otherwise they may think that you are just lying yet again.

(PS - how does one send an e-mail to a "home address" - print it out and pop it
in the post?)

I hope that you gave "my" IP address to the police to help them in their
investigation.

--
Mason is in denial - he is an alcoholic.
He claims that he drinks ten to twelve pints
a night and that it does him no harm.
He needs to seek help.

On Mar 2, 8:32*am, Simon Mason wrote:
On Mar 2, 8:18*am, (Alan Braggins) wrote:





In article , Simon Mason wrote:
On Mar 1, 3:41*pm, wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 07:26:57 -0800 (PST)

wrote:
On Mar 1, 3:14=A0pm, wrote:
Yet another feeble excuse.

You ever considered not constantly replying to your own posts or are you
just incapable of using a newsreader properly?

We are having a bit of troll trouble in urc at the moment by someone
who insists on crossposting to multiple groups
Blame him.

Is he also forging posts from you, or are the multiple copies of replies
from you with untrimmed lists of groups your fault, not his?
Followup-To set.

(For those not familiar with the history, some of the trolls have been
forging posts, so this is not a rhetorical question.)

Nobody is forging my posts, apart from a few "Simple Simon" nymshifts
by JMS.
It is just my way of dealing with Benn's trolling - simply put, the
high level of my current activity is down to a relatively high level
of troll activity.
If they would desist on posting excessively and stop crossposting then
the problem would vanish.
But if they want to keep wasting their time posting trolling messages
then that just shows how stupid they all are.

BTW - "Judith" sent me a private e-mail to my home address last year
pretending to be you, but I saw through it.
It was actually very useful as it contained "her" IP address.

It was, as you could say, a "Virgin" IP address before JMS put it
through an IP cloaking device.
Very useful as I said.

--
Simon Mason

"Simon Mason" wrote in message
...

On Mar 2, 8:32 am, Simon Mason wrote:
On Mar 2, 8:18 am, (Alan Braggins) wrote:





In article
,
Simon Mason wrote:
On Mar 1, 3:41 pm, wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 07:26:57 -0800 (PST)

wrote:
On Mar 1, 3:14=A0pm, wrote:
Yet another feeble excuse.

You ever considered not constantly replying to your own posts or are
you
just incapable of using a newsreader properly?

We are having a bit of troll trouble in urc at the moment by someone
who insists on crossposting to multiple groups
Blame him.

Is he also forging posts from you, or are the multiple copies of replies
from you with untrimmed lists of groups your fault, not his?
Followup-To set.

(For those not familiar with the history, some of the trolls have been
forging posts, so this is not a rhetorical question.)

Nobody is forging my posts, apart from a few "Simple Simon" nymshifts
by JMS.
It is just my way of dealing with Benn's trolling - simply put, the
high level of my current activity is down to a relatively high level
of troll activity.
If they would desist on posting excessively and stop crossposting then
the problem would vanish.
But if they want to keep wasting their time posting trolling messages
then that just shows how stupid they all are.

BTW - "Judith" sent me a private e-mail to my home address last year
pretending to be you, but I saw through it.
It was actually very useful as it contained "her" IP address.

It was, as you could say, a "Virgin" IP address before JMS put it
through an IP cloaking device.
Very useful as I said.
============================================

Well let's see it it. The alleged author has already given permission for
you to publish it.