Rules of the road must be for cyclists too, says B.C. lawyer

"A Vancouver lawyer is calling for the rules governing B.C. roads to be updated to include better safety provisions for cyclists, as the provincial government considers changes to the Motor Vehicle Act.

David Hay chairs the Motor Vehicle Act Legislative Review Committee, whose membership is drawn from the BC Cycling Coalition, HUB: Your Cycling Connection and the Trial Lawyers Association of B.C.

The committee has made several recommendations to the government on how to make the law friendlier to cyclists -- including changing the name of the act.

"The name itself is biased," said Hay. "It's inherently favourable to people who aren't vulnerable road users."

Hay says the act needs to remove the bias towards car drivers and focus on all users of the roadway: cyclists, pedestrians and drivers.

He suggests the new act be called the "Road Safety Act" to be more inclusive and show the rules are about promoting safety for everyone.

Change good for everybody

B.C.'s laws are old, says Hay, pointing out that the Motor Vehicle Act was first introduced in 1957.

It was updated in 1996 to include provisions that set out rights and obligations of cyclists. But that wasn't enough, he says.

"The present statute does not reflect the daily realities of cycling, and cycling has grown exponentially in the province," said Hay.

"We have to start to accommodate more trips to work... We have to start to look at congestion, and climate change. We have to look at the big problems we face in society."

Hay's optimistic that the provincial government is receptive to change and says change will be positive for everybody, not just for cyclists, but for drivers too, as everyone becomes more clear about their rights and obligations on the road.

"I think the government recognizes that we face a future that's entirely different from the past," he said.

4 ways to change the law for cyclists

There are several issues Hay would like to see clarified in an updated law.

1. Passing on the right

It happens all the time. Traffic is congested and cyclists overtake on the right. The current statute prohibits that conduct, except in limited circumstances. Hay says the definition of those circumstances remains ambiguous and should be clarified.

2. Minimum passing distances

In progressive cycling jurisdictions, such as the U.S. and throughout Europe,you must give cyclists a metre or a metre and a half of space. B.C.'s law, however, is silent on minimum passing distances.

3. Increased fines

Ontario has recently increased fines for drivers opening doors onto cyclists to between $300 to $1,000, plus three demerit points. Hay says that is one way of recognizing that we need to move traffic through the city by accommodating the growing population of cyclists.

4. Cyclists riding side by side

Cyclists are prohibited from riding side by side if it impedes the flow of traffic, but Hay would like to see more clarity on when it could be allowed if traffic isn't impeded. In European jurisdictions, he says, it's recognized that it's safer to be in numbers. Cyclists are more visible that way.

To hear the full interview with David Hay, listen to the audio labelled Cycling safety BC's road laws need update"

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/rules-road...160000386.html

Cheers

On Sunday, June 7, 2015 at 11:00:30 PM UTC-7, Sir Ridesalot wrote:
"A Vancouver lawyer is calling for the rules governing B.C. roads to be updated to include better safety provisions for cyclists, as the provincial government considers changes to the Motor Vehicle Act.

David Hay chairs the Motor Vehicle Act Legislative Review Committee, whose membership is drawn from the BC Cycling Coalition, HUB: Your Cycling Connection and the Trial Lawyers Association of B.C.

The committee has made several recommendations to the government on how to make the law friendlier to cyclists -- including changing the name of the act.

"The name itself is biased," said Hay. "It's inherently favourable to people who aren't vulnerable road users."

Hay says the act needs to remove the bias towards car drivers and focus on all users of the roadway: cyclists, pedestrians and drivers.

He suggests the new act be called the "Road Safety Act" to be more inclusive and show the rules are about promoting safety for everyone.

Change good for everybody

B.C.'s laws are old, says Hay, pointing out that the Motor Vehicle Act was first introduced in 1957.

It was updated in 1996 to include provisions that set out rights and obligations of cyclists. But that wasn't enough, he says.

"The present statute does not reflect the daily realities of cycling, and cycling has grown exponentially in the province," said Hay.

"We have to start to accommodate more trips to work... We have to start to look at congestion, and climate change. We have to look at the big problems we face in society."

Hay's optimistic that the provincial government is receptive to change and says change will be positive for everybody, not just for cyclists, but for drivers too, as everyone becomes more clear about their rights and obligations on the road.

"I think the government recognizes that we face a future that's entirely different from the past," he said.

4 ways to change the law for cyclists

There are several issues Hay would like to see clarified in an updated law.

1. Passing on the right

It happens all the time. Traffic is congested and cyclists overtake on the right. The current statute prohibits that conduct, except in limited circumstances. Hay says the definition of those circumstances remains ambiguous and should be clarified.

2. Minimum passing distances

In progressive cycling jurisdictions, such as the U.S. and throughout Europe,you must give cyclists a metre or a metre and a half of space. B.C.'s law, however, is silent on minimum passing distances.

3. Increased fines

Ontario has recently increased fines for drivers opening doors onto cyclists to between $300 to $1,000, plus three demerit points. Hay says that is one way of recognizing that we need to move traffic through the city by accommodating the growing population of cyclists.

4. Cyclists riding side by side

Cyclists are prohibited from riding side by side if it impedes the flow of traffic, but Hay would like to see more clarity on when it could be allowed if traffic isn't impeded. In European jurisdictions, he says, it's recognized that it's safer to be in numbers. Cyclists are more visible that way.

To hear the full interview with David Hay, listen to the audio labelled Cycling safety BC's road laws need update"

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/rules-road...160000386.html

It sounds like the BC MVA does need to be updated. Passing on the right is allowed in Oregon but not in most US states. Even before it was allowed here, the cops looked the other way because they wanted to get bikes out of traffic. We also adopted a minimum passing law about five years ago, although it is rarely enforced from what I can tell.

Riding abreast is allowed in most states, subject to passing and impeding laws -- which vary from state to state. I don't know if BC has specific code sections dealing with bicycle facilities, but that is an area that needs work in Oregon. Without clear rules and without some education, facilities can be very dangerous.

-- Jay Beattie.

On 6/8/2015 2:00 AM, Sir Ridesalot wrote:
...
4. Cyclists riding side by side

... In European jurisdictions, he says, it's recognized that it's safer to be in numbers.
Cyclists are more visible that way.

How about that!

--
- Frank Krygowski