|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Drink driver banned after being caught four times the limit
On Mar 5, 10:22*am, "Partac" wrote:
Aberdeen Sheriff Court heard Maughan, whose address was given in court papers as 20 Eigie Avenue, Balmedie, was caught with 105mcg of alcohol in 100ml of breath – exceeding the legal limit of 35mcg. Sheriff Graeme Napier disqualified Maughan from driving for two-and-a- half years and ordered him to pay a £900 fine for the drink driving offence http://www.eveningexpress.co.uk/Article.aspx/2645729 -- Simon Mason I expect he was relying on a cheap Chinese breath testing device to keep within the law, after drinking 12 pints a few hours before. What do you think about this new law then? The Frog plod seem to think they are OK - $2 can't buy much in the way of accuracy. QUOTE: Starting July 1, you'll have to carry a portable blood-alcohol test kit with you if you want to drive in France. You'll be fined 11 euros -- about $15 -- if you can't produce one when the gendarmes ask. Who knew such a thing even existed? Turns out they're about the size of a cigarette, available in the U.S. and are much cheaper when purchased in bulk. Expect to pay as much as $7 at a retail counter but as little as $2 when you buy a bunch. We found them at Walmart and suggest you read the instructions before your first drink, just to be safe. The chemically coated crystals inside these single-use devices react to concentrations of alcohol in the user's breath, turning colors above a certain threshold. Most manufacturers sell the devices tuned for “zero tolerance” situations (such as school, they note), 0.05 percent (the legal blood-alcohol level in France), or 0.08 percent, the limit in the U.S. (See “Calculate your limit: Avoid a DUI disaster.”) Friends in Europe suggest carrying two: One to use and one to show the police. Back in the good ol' U.S. of A, while the devices are strictly optional, the $2 gizmo strikes us as cheap insurance if you've had one more than you had planned. They won't tell you anything you didn't already know, but maybe you'll pay attention to the result based on sheer novelty value. Or you could ignore it and get a fancy, state-mandated electronic model that will ruin your life for the next three years. (See “You can't drive drunk if the car won't start.”) By the way, if your gadget disagrees with a roadside breath test administered by your favorite law enforcement professional, you lose. None of them will bail your butt out of jail, back you up in court or help you dance the SR-22 paperwork shuffle Read mo http://www.foxbusiness.com/personal-...#ixzz1oFecR4IF -- Simon Mason |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Drink driver banned after being caught four times the limit
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Drink driver banned after being caught four times the limit
wrote in message
... What do you think about this new law then? The Frog plod seem to think they are OK - $2 can't buy much in the way of accuracy. They are single-use chemical-based breathalysers, not electronic breathalysers. The £10 one you have wasted your money on is a silicon semiconductor-based sensor, known for their lack of accuracy and repeatability - plus I bet yours is not calibrated. The semiconductor sensor also requires replacement after a short period of time. You should have bought a fuel-cell-based breathalyser which is more accurate (although considerably more expensive). |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Drink driver banned after being caught four times the limit
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012 15:11:29 -0000
"Mr Benn" wrote: You should have bought a fuel-cell-based breathalyser which is more accurate (although considerably more expensive). Better yet just don't drink if you're going to drive. B2003 |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
How to tell if you're a militant cyclist (psycholist)
On Mar 5, 10:04*am, "Mr Benn" wrote:
"thirty-six" wrote in message ... On Mar 5, 9:27 am, "Mr Benn" wrote: "JNugent" wrote in message ... On 04/03/2012 19:05, Just zis Guy, you know? wrote: On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 10:46:32 -0800 (PST), Bret Cahill *wrote: WARNING SIGNS If three or more of the following ring true, you may be a militant cyclist: (1) *You obsessively follow competitive cycling events and try to emulate your professional heroes by wearing garish-coloured Lycra clothing when cycling to the local shop. (2) *You believe that it is acceptable to break road laws if done "carefully". Supposing you can see several miles in all directions and no motorists are around to see you go cruise through an interesction? Isn't that like, "if a tree falls in the woods . . ." Mr Benn is just trying to demonise an "out group" to avoid the cognitive dissonance brought on by the vile behaviour of himself and his friends. It's rather sad. Guy In what "vile behaviour" do you say he indulges? I would like to know that as well. What about the helmet (bowler), shield (briefcase) and sword (umbrella), Mr Benn, you ARE the urban warrior. *The threat is always there, which is why the uniform of the old clerical army got some respect, the threat of violence. *The menace of the uniform in almost as bad as the government paid monkies. *Oh, hold on, are tyou a civil servant anyway? Err... *yes. Are you temporarily employed or signed for life? |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Drink driver banned after being caught four times the limit
On Mar 5, 2:51*pm, wrote:
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012 06:12:04 -0800 (PST) wrote: I expect he was relying on a cheap Chinese breath testing device to keep within the law, after drinking 12 pints a few hours before. What do you think about this new law then? The Frog plod seem to think they are OK - $2 can't buy much in the way of accuracy. QUOTE: Starting July 1, you'll have to carry a portable blood-alcohol test kit with you if you want to drive in France. You'll be fined 11 euros -- about $15 -- if you can't produce one when the gendarmes ask. Frankly who's going to bother. You're supposed to keep a flourescent vest on the back seat too amongst other things but I've never bothered in all the times I've driven in france In Germany you have to have a vest for *each* person in the car AND they all have to be inside the vehicle, otherwise that is another offence you are committing. -- Simon Mason |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Drink driver banned after being caught four times the limit
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012 08:05:35 -0800 (PST)
Simon Mason wrote: In Germany you have to have a vest for *each* person in the car AND they all have to be inside the vehicle, otherwise that is another offence you are committing. I'm sure they'll let you out of the car, if its on fire for example. Anyway , its all just a moneymaking scam. No one needs a flourescent vest unless they plan on repairing the vehicle themselves. Best thing is just to get out and climb up the verge until the breakdown truck arrives. If I have to pay a fine so I'm not killed by some albanian truck driver who's just driven 12 hours without a break thats fine by me. B2003 |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Drink driver banned after being caught four times the limit
In message
, Simon Mason writes On Mar 5, 2:51*pm, wrote: On Mon, 5 Mar 2012 06:12:04 -0800 (PST) wrote: I expect he was relying on a cheap Chinese breath testing device to keep within the law, after drinking 12 pints a few hours before. What do you think about this new law then? The Frog plod seem to think they are OK - $2 can't buy much in the way of accuracy. QUOTE: Starting July 1, you'll have to carry a portable blood-alcohol test kit with you if you want to drive in France. You'll be fined 11 euros -- about $15 -- if you can't produce one when the gendarmes ask. Frankly who's going to bother. You're supposed to keep a flourescent vest on the back seat too amongst other things but I've never bothered in all the times I've driven in france In Germany you have to have a vest for *each* person in the car AND they all have to be inside the vehicle, otherwise that is another offence you are committing. In order to avoid falling foul of the law when driving in western Europe, does anyone have a list of all the things you need to carry? The way things seem to be going, there's going to be little actual room in the car for passengers. -- Ian |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
How to tell if you're a militant cyclist (psycholist)
On Mar 4, 8:18*pm, "Mr. Benn" wrote:
"Paul - xxx" *wrote in ... How come in an earlier discussion you suggested I might be a psycholist "Denying there is a problem is not a solution. *But I wouldn't expect anything else from psycholists." in the reply you made to dr6092, which referenced my replies to your thread. *Your own ruleset seems to negate this view .. ================================================== === Paul, you passed the test with flying colours, that's the main thing. *You are definitely not a militant cyclist. *Sorry for any inference that you were. *It was directed at Doctor 6092. And I notice that instead of spending time thinking about your poor logic and fixing it, you just carry on spraying assorted newsgroups. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
My brush with a psycholist | Mr. Benn[_7_] | UK | 70 | November 6th 10 11:01 AM |
Environmental militant slain at Silver Spring building after taking hostages | Bill Weir | Mountain Biking | 15 | September 15th 10 05:24 PM |
Psycholist | JMS | UK | 456 | July 21st 10 08:07 AM |
Psycholist | judith | UK | 13 | November 13th 08 08:05 AM |
The Militant wing of u.r.c | David Martin | UK | 12 | May 3rd 05 03:58 PM |