|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
More dumb**** liberals...
|
Ads |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
More dumb**** liberals...
On Aug 2, 2:48*pm, ST wrote:
Cowards? Sorry assbag I do not sit here all day and read all these ****in posts from you hermits. Dear Fat Steve - It's cool to flame your fellow usenet participants for being nerds only if you include lump yourself in with them. Otherwise, you're just being a hypocrite and your "friends" here will remain singular. you're welcome, K. Gringioni. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
More dumb**** liberals...
In article ,
Andre wrote: On Aug 2, 9:40*am, ST wrote: On 8/2/08 6:21 AM, in article , "Andre" wrote: On Aug 1, 10:27*pm, ST wrote: These ASSBAGS learned this from their braindead college professors who partied too much during the 60's-70's These morons could pass for their Vietnam era proff's http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b3b_1217630606 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vincen...ecution-of-geo... 427.html Damn you guys are idiots.............. Not only are you the idiot, but you're a double idiot for not knowing you're an idiot. You know, if someone's an idiot and knows they're an idiot, it almost makes them smart. That isn't the case here, on either count. -- tanx, Howard The bloody pubs are bloody dull The bloody clubs are bloody full Of bloody girls and bloody guys With bloody murder in their eyes remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok? |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
More dumb**** liberals...
In article ,
"Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote: On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 14:27:57 -0700 (PDT), "Paul G." wrote: Speaking of wusses, S--T and Kuntitch are a pair of them. You cowards remind me of "W"uss sitting on his ass on 9/11. I get in your faces and you look the other way. No balls, just like your cowardly president. The funny thing about this clown is that I have blocked him a long time ago. Let him fume all he wants since I see none of it unless someone answers the clown. Paul: I imagine you're as amused as I am the Kunich uses a killfile on people like you or me. He always talks about other people showing a "lack of manhood" but he will comment on things people he has killfiled say but then can't read their replies to him - that seems to indicate a certain lack of character. On the other hand, it does save one the effort of having to respond to all of his monotonously predictable drivel. So there are pluses. -- tanx, Howard The bloody pubs are bloody dull The bloody clubs are bloody full Of bloody girls and bloody guys With bloody murder in their eyes remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok? |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
More dumb**** liberals...
In article , ST wrote:
On 8/2/08 3:37 PM, in article , "Howard Kveck" Steve, did you miss the part that it was the brigade's *equipment* that they were protesting, not the soldiers? Or is that distinction too subtle for you? And by the way, since when is the war in Iraq about protecting our lives? Equipment is an inanimate object assbag! You don't say. They protest people performing their job. You obviously don't understand what the concept of the protest was about. It says it right in the article: "militarism." According to you no military action protects your life. How do you know what was kept from happening here? Steve, I asked you about the war in Iraq and you extrapolate that to Kunichian levels of stupidity. Good job. -- tanx, Howard The bloody pubs are bloody dull The bloody clubs are bloody full Of bloody girls and bloody guys With bloody murder in their eyes remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok? |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
More dumb**** liberals...
In article ,
"Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote: "ST" wrote in message ... On 8/2/08 3:33 PM, in article Those are NOT "Right Wing" extremists! They are RELIGIOUS extremists, you know....just the Islamic extremists. Talking to that moron is like talking to one of those clown toys with the built in 8 answers. Don't bother because you already know all 8 answers he gives. When it comes to you and Steve, we only needs three answers: 1) "You're wrong." 2) "You're an idiot." 3) "You're wrong *and* an idiot." -- tanx, Howard The bloody pubs are bloody dull The bloody clubs are bloody full Of bloody girls and bloody guys With bloody murder in their eyes remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok? |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
More dumb**** liberals...
In article ,
"Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote: "Ron Ruff" wrote in message ... We have troops stationed in over a hundred countries and our military budget is more than the rest of the world combined. We overthrow governments (even democratic ones) when they do not behave in our corporate interests, and support oppressive dictatorships when they do. If you really wonder why they hate us... Which democratic government was it that we overthrew because of corporate interests again? Chile, Guatemala and Iran might be a good place to start. -- tanx, Howard The bloody pubs are bloody dull The bloody clubs are bloody full Of bloody girls and bloody guys With bloody murder in their eyes remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok? |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
More dumb**** liberals...
In article ,
"Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote: "Fred Fredburger" wrote in message . .. Howard Kveck wrote: In article , ST wrote: Steve, did you miss the part that it was the brigade's *equipment* that they were protesting, not the soldiers? Or is that distinction too subtle for you? And by the way, since when is the war in Iraq about protecting our lives? People ARE equipment. "since when is the war in Iraq about protecting our lives?" When was the last airplane flown into a building again? Bombs in subways? Buses? It appears to be idiotic that Kveck ain't smart enough to have discerned that the terrorists were behind the attacks on the US for 30 years until we fought back. Suddenly Kveck forgets all about it. So, Tom, let us know again: what *specific evidence* is there that Iraq had anything to do with flying planes into buildings in the US? Bombing a subway? Or a bus? Remember, I asked for *specific evidence" on this. Not ridiculous conjecture. Or do you think that the US attacking any old country was enough to scare the "terrorists" into not attacking the US? Had it not occurred to you in all your learned glory that the "terrorists" don't have to come here to attack US interests when they have been provided plenty of targets in easy reach in Iraq? In all honesty, Tom, you have all the moral and intellectual honesty of a cancer cell, which is to say, none at all. You get a lot of grief in here but you earn *every single bit* of it because of your constant attacks on the intelligence of those who disagree with you and your ideology. You're wrong about more things in a day than most others are in a year. Posted under this header just so you'll see it. -- tanx, Howard The bloody pubs are bloody dull The bloody clubs are bloody full Of bloody girls and bloody guys With bloody murder in their eyes remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok? |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
More dumb**** liberals...
In article ,
"Tom Kunich" cyclintom@yahoo. com wrote: "Fred Fredburger" wrote in message . .. Howard Kveck wrote: In article , ST wrote: Steve, did you miss the part that it was the brigade's *equipment* that they were protesting, not the soldiers? Or is that distinction too subtle for you? And by the way, since when is the war in Iraq about protecting our lives? People ARE equipment. "since when is the war in Iraq about protecting our lives?" When was the last airplane flown into a building again? Bombs in subways? Buses? It appears to be idiotic that Kveck ain't smart enough to have discerned that the terrorists were behind the attacks on the US for 30 years until we fought back. Suddenly Kveck forgets all about it. So, Tom, let us know again: what *specific evidence* is there that Iraq had anything to do with flying planes into buildings in the US? Bombing a subway? Or a bus? Remember, I asked for *specific evidence" on this. Not ridiculous conjecture. Or do you think that the US attacking any old country was enough to scare the "terrorists" into not attacking the US? Had it not occurred to you in all your learned glory that the "terrorists" don't have to come here to attack US interests when they have been provided plenty of targets in easy reach in Iraq? In all honesty, Tom, you have all the moral and intellectual honesty of a cancer cell, which is to say, none at all. You get a lot of grief in here but you earn *every single bit* of it because of your constant attacks on the intelligence of those who disagree with you and your ideology. You're wrong about more things in a day than most others are in a year. -- tanx, Howard The bloody pubs are bloody dull The bloody clubs are bloody full Of bloody girls and bloody guys With bloody murder in their eyes remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok? |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
More dumb**** liberals...
On Aug 2, 9:05*pm, ST wrote:
On 8/2/08 9:06 PM, in article , "Kurgan Gringioni" wrote: On Aug 2, 2:48*pm, ST wrote: Cowards? Sorry assbag I do not sit here all day and read all these ****in posts from you hermits. Dear Fat Steve - It's cool to flame your fellow usenet participants for being nerds only if you include lump yourself in with them. Otherwise, you're just being a hypocrite and your "friends" here will remain singular. you're welcome, K. Gringioni. I have no friends here Fairy Assbag.. Dumbass - Suit yourself. thanks, K. Gringioni. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Liberals hard at work | DI | General | 19 | June 25th 07 07:16 PM |