|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
70 mph on a bike in the TDF?
Did anyone else catch Lance Armstrong on the Tonight Show with Jay Leno last
evening? Lance was asked by Leno what his fastest speed was on his bike in the Tour de France, and Lance replied; "70 miles per hour!" ??? He also said you don't want to crash at that speed. -tom |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Tom Nakashima Wrote: Did anyone else catch Lance Armstrong on the Tonight Show with Jay Len last evening? Lance was asked by Leno what his fastest speed was on his bike in th Tour de France, and Lance replied; "70 miles per hour!" ??? He also said you don't want to crash at that speed. -tom I've yet to race in the Tour but I have broken 70 MPH on a long descen with tailwind. In the mountains, natch. Just a few weeks ago I broke 63 on a short but terrifyingly stee descent in the hills. I had climbed a steep section and was traversin the top, flat section, around a curve so I had some speed and recovery. Since it had been 15 years since I traveled this road, I forgot th descent until it was too late to brake safely. Since the road wa straight, I tucked in, dropped to my 12 in the back and held on. Th road was very rough and I never looked down, relying on the maximu recording on my computer. Ex post facto, I looked at a topo map. In 1/4 mile, I had descende almost 300feet. Wow, a 20% average grade. I think I shall keep this road a secret now that I just bought a Pola S720i. It will be my training secret -- Weisse Luft |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Tom Nakashima Wrote: Did anyone else catch Lance Armstrong on the Tonight Show with Jay Len last evening? Lance was asked by Leno what his fastest speed was on his bike in th Tour de France, and Lance replied; "70 miles per hour!" ??? He also said you don't want to crash at that speed. -tom I've yet to race in the Tour but I have broken 70 MPH on a long descen with tailwind. In the mountains, natch. Just a few weeks ago I broke 63 on a short but terrifyingly stee descent in the hills. I had climbed a steep section and was traversin the top, flat section, around a curve so I had some speed and recovery. Since it had been 15 years since I traveled this road, I forgot th descent until it was too late to brake safely. Since the road wa straight, I tucked in, dropped to my 12 in the back and held on. Th road was very rough and I never looked down, relying on the maximu recording on my computer. Ex post facto, I looked at a topo map. In 1/4 mile, I had descende almost 300feet. Wow, a 20% average grade. I think I shall keep this road a secret now that I just bought a Pola S720i. It will be my training secret -- Weisse Luft |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Weisse Luft" wrote in message ... I've yet to race in the Tour but I have broken 70 MPH on a long descent with tailwind. In the mountains, natch. Just a few weeks ago I broke 63 on a short but terrifyingly steep descent in the hills. I had climbed a steep section and was traversing the top, flat section, around a curve so I had some speed and recovery. Since it had been 15 years since I traveled this road, I forgot the descent until it was too late to brake safely. Since the road was straight, I tucked in, dropped to my 12 in the back and held on. The road was very rough and I never looked down, relying on the maximum recording on my computer. Ex post facto, I looked at a topo map. In 1/4 mile, I had descended almost 300feet. Wow, a 20% average grade. I think I shall keep this road a secret now that I just bought a Polar S720i. It will be my training secret. -- Weisse Luft Stay away from those power-lines with that polar s720i, I have the same HRM. It will give you a false reading. I once read a103 mph, with a 225 cadence with my s720i. You will get spikes, and they can be corrected in the error data menu. -tom |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Weisse Luft" wrote in message ... I've yet to race in the Tour but I have broken 70 MPH on a long descent with tailwind. In the mountains, natch. Just a few weeks ago I broke 63 on a short but terrifyingly steep descent in the hills. I had climbed a steep section and was traversing the top, flat section, around a curve so I had some speed and recovery. Since it had been 15 years since I traveled this road, I forgot the descent until it was too late to brake safely. Since the road was straight, I tucked in, dropped to my 12 in the back and held on. The road was very rough and I never looked down, relying on the maximum recording on my computer. Ex post facto, I looked at a topo map. In 1/4 mile, I had descended almost 300feet. Wow, a 20% average grade. I think I shall keep this road a secret now that I just bought a Polar S720i. It will be my training secret. -- Weisse Luft Stay away from those power-lines with that polar s720i, I have the same HRM. It will give you a false reading. I once read a103 mph, with a 225 cadence with my s720i. You will get spikes, and they can be corrected in the error data menu. -tom |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Weisse Luft Wrote: I've yet to race in the Tour but I have broken 70 MPH on a long descent with tailwind. In the mountains, natch. Just a few weeks ago I broke 63 on a short but terrifyingly steep descent in the hills. I had climbed a steep section and was traversing the top, flat section, around a curve so I had some speed and recovery. Since it had been 15 years since I traveled this road, I forgot the descent until it was too late to brake safely. Since the road was straight, I tucked in, dropped to my 12 in the back and held on. The road was very rough and I never looked down, relying on the maximum recording on my computer. Ex post facto, I looked at a topo map. In 1/4 mile, I had descended almost 300feet. Wow, a 20% average grade. I think I shall keep this road a secret now that I just bought a Polar S720i. It will be my training secret. I call major BS. Over 70 MPH is nonsense. -- Tuschinski |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Weisse Luft Wrote: I've yet to race in the Tour but I have broken 70 MPH on a long descent with tailwind. In the mountains, natch. Just a few weeks ago I broke 63 on a short but terrifyingly steep descent in the hills. I had climbed a steep section and was traversing the top, flat section, around a curve so I had some speed and recovery. Since it had been 15 years since I traveled this road, I forgot the descent until it was too late to brake safely. Since the road was straight, I tucked in, dropped to my 12 in the back and held on. The road was very rough and I never looked down, relying on the maximum recording on my computer. Ex post facto, I looked at a topo map. In 1/4 mile, I had descended almost 300feet. Wow, a 20% average grade. I think I shall keep this road a secret now that I just bought a Polar S720i. It will be my training secret. I call major BS. Over 70 MPH is nonsense. -- Tuschinski |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Call BS if you want, the 70 MPH was in a GROUP and they also recorde the same. This is the mountains, not some sandhills. Rock mountains not cinder cones. This was in mountains, with a tailwind and on Italian steel. Oh yes, I have set my S720i's speed transmitter to the high powe setting to prevent interference. Fortunately my riding is in an are that is relatively free of power lines, for now. Just to quell your suspicions, I will go do the 63 MPH descent Sunda and post the complete data files. You will see altitude, speed, hear rate and distance. From there you can apply mechanics and determin the rate of change of energy. IMHO, it takes about 1200 Watts t achieve steady state 70 MPH in a tuck -- Weisse Luft |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Call BS if you want, the 70 MPH was in a GROUP and they also recorde the same. This is the mountains, not some sandhills. Rock mountains not cinder cones. This was in mountains, with a tailwind and on Italian steel. Oh yes, I have set my S720i's speed transmitter to the high powe setting to prevent interference. Fortunately my riding is in an are that is relatively free of power lines, for now. Just to quell your suspicions, I will go do the 63 MPH descent Sunda and post the complete data files. You will see altitude, speed, hear rate and distance. From there you can apply mechanics and determin the rate of change of energy. IMHO, it takes about 1200 Watts t achieve steady state 70 MPH in a tuck -- Weisse Luft |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Tuschinski" wrote in message ... I call major BS. Over 70 MPH is nonsense. -- Tuschinski And why is that? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
if you wanted maximum braking, where would you sit? | wle | Techniques | 133 | November 18th 15 02:10 AM |
Bike Stores Endangerd Because of Super Chain Stores? | James Lynx | General | 112 | June 5th 04 01:22 PM |
Trips for Kids 13th Annual Bike Swap & Sale | Marilyn Price | Rides | 0 | June 1st 04 04:53 AM |
Trips for Kids 13th Annual Bike Swap & Sale | Marilyn Price | Marketplace | 0 | June 1st 04 04:52 AM |
Trips for Kids 13th Annual Bike Swap & Sale | Marilyn Price | Recumbent Biking | 0 | June 1st 04 04:49 AM |