A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » Regional Cycling » UK
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Reckless cyclist has to pay compo to pedestrian he mowed down.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old April 18th 19, 03:00 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
JNugent[_11_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 56
Default Reckless cyclist has to pay compo to pedestrian he mowed down.

On 17/04/2019 19:03, TMS320 wrote:
On 17/04/2019 10:28, JNugent wrote:
On 17/04/2019 09:24, TMS320 wrote:
On 17/04/2019 00:28, JNugent wrote:
On 16/04/2019 22:01, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
MrCheerful wrote:


https://www.stokesentinel.co.uk/news/stoke-on-trent-news/cyclist-fined-hitting-pedestrian-town-2767779


But, he will be on the dole and won't have the £50.
As for writing a letter, most cyclists can't even spell their first
name. Stupid does as stupid rides.

You two should share Onanism tips with Nugent.

They seem to think it "fun" to post annoyinfg stuff in a cycling
NG. Sad.

Why does it annoy you to be told of the exploits of cyclists?

This NG is called uk.rec.CYCLING.


Very good!

That, of course, is the very reason for my question. Whatever else you
may think of Messrs Pounder and Cheerful and their posts here, you
have to admit that they are almost always on-topic for a cycling
newsgroup. Not every one of their opponents are as punctilious in
staying on-topic, are they?

Well, unless you have a different explanation - perhaps along the
lines that cyclists' misdeeds are somehow off-topic in "uk.rec.CYCLING".


If the misdeed (or other event of note) happened in the course of riding
the bike it is clearly on topic.

Otherwise, when the bicycle is used for transport but takes no part in
the event described it is plainly not on topic.


Says who?

This is not a difficult distinction.


It isn't.

But neither is it a relevant one.

Ads
  #12  
Old April 18th 19, 09:31 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
TMS320
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,878
Default Reckless cyclist has to pay compo to pedestrian he mowed down.

On 18/04/2019 03:00, JNugent wrote:
On 17/04/2019 19:03, TMS320 wrote:
On 17/04/2019 10:28, JNugent wrote:
On 17/04/2019 09:24, TMS320 wrote:
On 17/04/2019 00:28, JNugent wrote:
On 16/04/2019 22:01, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
MrCheerful wrote:

https://www.stokesentinel.co.uk/news/stoke-on-trent-news/cyclist-fined-hitting-pedestrian-town-2767779


But, he will be on the dole and won't have the £50.
As for writing a letter, most cyclists can't even spell their first
name. Stupid does as stupid rides.

You two should share Onanism tips with Nugent.

They seem to think it "fun" to post annoyinfg stuff in a cycling
NG. Sad.

Why does it annoy you to be told of the exploits of cyclists?

This NG is called uk.rec.CYCLING.

Very good!

That, of course, is the very reason for my question. Whatever else
you may think of Messrs Pounder and Cheerful and their posts here,
you have to admit that they are almost always on-topic for a cycling
newsgroup. Not every one of their opponents are as punctilious in
staying on-topic, are they?

Well, unless you have a different explanation - perhaps along the
lines that cyclists' misdeeds are somehow off-topic in "uk.rec.CYCLING".


If the misdeed (or other event of note) happened in the course of
riding the bike it is clearly on topic.

Otherwise, when the bicycle is used for transport but takes no part in
the event described it is plainly not on topic.


Says who?


Anybody can say so.

This is not a difficult distinction.


It isn't.

But neither is it a relevant one.


Your opinions are usually of no worth.
  #13  
Old April 18th 19, 10:09 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Peter Keller[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,339
Default Reckless cyclist has to pay compo to pedestrian he mowed down.

On 18/04/2019 08:09, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote:
On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 18:25:10 GMT, "Mr Pounder Esquire"
wrote:

Kerr-Mudd,John wrote:
On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 18:05:06 GMT, Simon Jester
wrote:

On Tuesday, April 16, 2019 at 6:25:49 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
MrCheerful wrote:
https://www.stokesentinel.co.uk/news...ews/cyclist-fi
n ed-
hitting-pedestrian-town-2767779

But, he will be on the dole and won't have the £50.
As for writing a letter, most cyclists can't even spell their first
name. Stupid does as stupid rides.

You two should share Onanism tips with Nugent.

They seem to think it "fun" to post annoyinfg stuff in a cycling NG.
Sad.


Oh look! It's the sad **** who posted his driving lessons and his ****
ups in the driving group many years ago. Nobody could help him. Oh how
we laughed! He will always be a road cockroach on a bicycle as he is
too stupid to drive a car.
This group takes the slash out of cyclists.
If you don't like what you read, **** off to the boring moderated
group. You will not be missed.

Show us yer chisel.



Yes show it to us.
Or are you ashamed of the amount of blood, gunk, turds and snot that is
dripping from it?
  #14  
Old April 18th 19, 12:55 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
JNugent[_11_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 56
Default Reckless cyclist has to pay compo to pedestrian he mowed down.

On 18/04/2019 09:31, TMS320 wrote:
On 18/04/2019 03:00, JNugent wrote:
On 17/04/2019 19:03, TMS320 wrote:
On 17/04/2019 10:28, JNugent wrote:
On 17/04/2019 09:24, TMS320 wrote:
On 17/04/2019 00:28, JNugent wrote:
On 16/04/2019 22:01, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote:
Simon Jester wrote:
Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
MrCheerful wrote:

https://www.stokesentinel.co.uk/news/stoke-on-trent-news/cyclist-fined-hitting-pedestrian-town-2767779


But, he will be on the dole and won't have the £50.
As for writing a letter, most cyclists can't even spell their
first
name. Stupid does as stupid rides.

You two should share Onanism tips with Nugent.

They seem to think it "fun" to post annoyinfg stuff in a cycling
NG. Sad.

Why does it annoy you to be told of the exploits of cyclists?

This NG is called uk.rec.CYCLING.

Very good!

That, of course, is the very reason for my question. Whatever else
you may think of Messrs Pounder and Cheerful and their posts here,
you have to admit that they are almost always on-topic for a cycling
newsgroup. Not every one of their opponents are as punctilious in
staying on-topic, are they?

Well, unless you have a different explanation - perhaps along the
lines that cyclists' misdeeds are somehow off-topic in
"uk.rec.CYCLING".

If the misdeed (or other event of note) happened in the course of
riding the bike it is clearly on topic.

Otherwise, when the bicycle is used for transport but takes no part
in the event described it is plainly not on topic.


Says who?


Anybody can say so.


But not convincingly.

This is not a difficult distinction.


It isn't.

But neither is it a relevant one.


Your opinions are usually of no worth.


That's how much I charge for them.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Police hunt cyclist that mowed down a pedestrian Mrcheerful UK 3 February 5th 15 02:29 AM
Slap on the wrist for pavement cyclist that mowed down pedestrian Mrcheerful UK 11 January 17th 14 08:11 PM
Update on the cyclist that mowed down the child on the crossing Mrcheerful[_3_] UK 7 August 1st 13 07:00 PM
Racing cyclist with previous, mowed down and killed another racer Mrcheerful[_3_] UK 20 June 12th 13 09:45 PM
He mowed down a cyclist Bertie Wooster[_2_] UK 9 June 24th 12 06:03 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2019 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.