|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Not even the sibling he consumed in the womb can help him now
During his grand jury testimony, Hamilton will be alone in a room with
at least one prosecutor, up to 23 grand jurors, and a court reporter. His attorney will have to wait outside, and no judge will be present. By law, neither the prosecutors nor the jurors may even acknowledge publicly that the investigation is taking place before issuing an indictment. Read mo http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/mo...xzz0vNVIaqe x |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Not even the sibling he consumed in the womb can help him now
"Anton Berlin" wrote in message
... During his grand jury testimony, Hamilton will be alone in a room with at least one prosecutor, up to 23 grand jurors, and a court reporter. His attorney will have to wait outside, and no judge will be present. By law, neither the prosecutors nor the jurors may even acknowledge publicly that the investigation is taking place before issuing an indictment. Read mo http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/mo...xzz0vNVIaqe x Tyler may be alone in the room, but he's allowed to have an attorney present outside the courtroom and may interrupt the proceedings and consult with that attorney, if I understand things correctly. The idea that someone can be separated from all elements of comfort and made to sweat it out in hopes of getting them to crack is generally a bit of a stretch. You can be made to look guilty by choosing not to incriminate yourself, but you (or Tyler in this case) are not the subject of the grand jury. The degree to which immunity is relevant depends upon what the person testifying might have as a liability (what they can go after criminally) and I doubt there's all that much there for Tyler. But it's good drama & fun concocting all these scary but probably-not-relevant scenarios! --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Not even the sibling he consumed in the womb can help him now
On 8/1/2010 6:08 PM, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote:
"Anton wrote in message ... During his grand jury testimony, Hamilton will be alone in a room with at least one prosecutor, up to 23 grand jurors, and a court reporter. His attorney will have to wait outside, and no judge will be present. By law, neither the prosecutors nor the jurors may even acknowledge publicly that the investigation is taking place before issuing an indictment. Read mo http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/mo...xzz0vNVIaqe x Tyler may be alone in the room, but he's allowed to have an attorney present outside the courtroom and may interrupt the proceedings and consult with that attorney, if I understand things correctly. True. as many times as you need to consult, you can. The idea that someone can be separated from all elements of comfort and made to sweat it out in hopes of getting them to crack is generally a bit of a stretch. You can be made to look guilty by choosing not to incriminate yourself, but you (or Tyler in this case) are not the subject of the grand jury. Tyler may be the subject or target of the grand jury. We don't know that. I suspect his attorney has worked out favorable terms for his truthful testimony. The degree to which immunity is relevant depends upon what the person testifying might have as a liability (what they can go after criminally) and I doubt there's all that much there for Tyler. That immunity is only for his own statements that might incriminate him. Once granted use or transactional immunity, he has to answer. His biggest problem, unless there is more that we don't know, will be liability for perjury during his sworn testimony in the CAS hearing. But it's good drama& fun concocting all these scary but probably-not-relevant scenarios! No drama at all. The proceeding is secret and Tyler can't say anything about what was asked and how he answered, except to his attorney. --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Not even the sibling he consumed in the womb can help him now
"B. Lafferty" wrote in message
... On 8/1/2010 6:08 PM, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote: "Anton wrote in message ... During his grand jury testimony, Hamilton will be alone in a room with at least one prosecutor, up to 23 grand jurors, and a court reporter. His attorney will have to wait outside, and no judge will be present. By law, neither the prosecutors nor the jurors may even acknowledge publicly that the investigation is taking place before issuing an indictment. Read mo http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/mo...xzz0vNVIaqe x Tyler may be alone in the room, but he's allowed to have an attorney present outside the courtroom and may interrupt the proceedings and consult with that attorney, if I understand things correctly. True. as many times as you need to consult, you can. The idea that someone can be separated from all elements of comfort and made to sweat it out in hopes of getting them to crack is generally a bit of a stretch. You can be made to look guilty by choosing not to incriminate yourself, but you (or Tyler in this case) are not the subject of the grand jury. Tyler may be the subject or target of the grand jury. We don't know that. I suspect his attorney has worked out favorable terms for his truthful testimony. So how many different subjects or targets do you think there are? How many were there in BALCO? I can't see a Grand Jury having a whole lot of interest in somebody they perceive as a nobody. This case reaches back quite some ways, and without star power (Lance) I don't see how they're going to get much interest out of it from a Grand Jury. They're just people, y'know? The degree to which immunity is relevant depends upon what the person testifying might have as a liability (what they can go after criminally) and I doubt there's all that much there for Tyler. That immunity is only for his own statements that might incriminate him. Once granted use or transactional immunity, he has to answer. His biggest problem, unless there is more that we don't know, will be liability for perjury during his sworn testimony in the CAS hearing. But I seriously doubt Tyler has anything to lose by not recollecting. Seriously, he's likely only to perjure himself in some way that could come back to him, even with immunity. What does he have to gain from testifying (remembering)? But it's good drama& fun concocting all these scary but probably-not-relevant scenarios! No drama at all. The proceeding is secret and Tyler can't say anything about what was asked and how he answered, except to his attorney. I meant drama on RBR. Was I really that obtuse? --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Not even the sibling he consumed in the womb can help him now
"Mike Jacoubowsky" wrote in message m... : : But I seriously doubt Tyler has anything to lose by not recollecting. : Seriously, he's likely only to perjure himself in some way that could : come back to him, even with immunity. What does he have to gain from : testifying (remembering)? Dumbass - Not much. He does, however, have something to gain by not saying much (pssssst, LANCE, pass me some boxes of cash). thanks, Kurgan. presented by Gringioni. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Not even the sibling he consumed in the womb can help him now
On 8/1/2010 8:33 PM, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote:
"B. wrote in message ... On 8/1/2010 6:08 PM, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote: "Anton wrote in message ... During his grand jury testimony, Hamilton will be alone in a room with at least one prosecutor, up to 23 grand jurors, and a court reporter. His attorney will have to wait outside, and no judge will be present. By law, neither the prosecutors nor the jurors may even acknowledge publicly that the investigation is taking place before issuing an indictment. Read mo http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/mo...xzz0vNVIaqe x Tyler may be alone in the room, but he's allowed to have an attorney present outside the courtroom and may interrupt the proceedings and consult with that attorney, if I understand things correctly. True. as many times as you need to consult, you can. The idea that someone can be separated from all elements of comfort and made to sweat it out in hopes of getting them to crack is generally a bit of a stretch. You can be made to look guilty by choosing not to incriminate yourself, but you (or Tyler in this case) are not the subject of the grand jury. Tyler may be the subject or target of the grand jury. We don't know that. I suspect his attorney has worked out favorable terms for his truthful testimony. So how many different subjects or targets do you think there are? How many were there in BALCO? I have no idea. That is known by the US Attorney. I can't see a Grand Jury having a whole lot of interest in somebody they perceive as a nobody. Grand Juries indict nobodies all the time. This case reaches back quite some ways, and without star power (Lance) I don't see how they're going to get much interest out of it from a Grand Jury. They're just people, y'know? Recall please that this inquiry was well under way and involved many of the riders now being interviewed before Landis made his allegations. The degree to which immunity is relevant depends upon what the person testifying might have as a liability (what they can go after criminally) and I doubt there's all that much there for Tyler. That immunity is only for his own statements that might incriminate him. Once granted use or transactional immunity, he has to answer. His biggest problem, unless there is more that we don't know, will be liability for perjury during his sworn testimony in the CAS hearing. But I seriously doubt Tyler has anything to lose by not recollecting. Tyler has a problem not remembering when he clearly remembered enough to testify under oath that he remembered not using any PED or methods. He also will be testifying before the grand jury without ( probably) knowing what others have told the Feds and/or testified to in front of the same grand jury he will be testifying in front of. Seriously, he's likely only to perjure himself in some way that could come back to him, even with immunity. What does he have to gain from testifying (remembering)? He won't be perjuring himself by telling the truth with a grant of immunity. Once he has the immunity he wants, it makes sense for him to "remember" and tell the truth. But it's good drama& fun concocting all these scary but probably-not-relevant scenarios! No drama at all. The proceeding is secret and Tyler can't say anything about what was asked and how he answered, except to his attorney. I meant drama on RBR. Was I really that obtuse? Yes. :-) --Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReactionBicycles.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Not even the sibling he consumed in the womb can help him now
"B. Lafferty" wrote in message ... : : He won't be perjuring himself by telling the truth with a grant of : immunity. Once he has the immunity he wants, it makes sense for him to : "remember" and tell the truth. Dumbass - He won't get any hush money that way. How naive are you? thanks, Kurgan. presented by Gringioni. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Not even the sibling he consumed in the womb can help him now
Anton Berlin wrote:
During his grand jury testimony, Hamilton will be alone in a room with at least one prosecutor, up to 23 grand jurors, and a court reporter. His attorney will have to wait outside, and no judge will be present. By law, neither the prosecutors nor the jurors may even acknowledge publicly that the investigation is taking place before issuing an indictment. Read mo http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/mo...xzz0vNVIaqe x Where do people get this stuff? Witnesses can absolutely talk all they want about their grand jury testimony. Ever hear of something called the First Amendment? Last time I checked federal courts enforce that little 'rule' too. Thanks, Magilla |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Not even the sibling he consumed in the womb can help him now
On Aug 19, 5:09*am, Magilla Gorilla wrote:
Anton Berlin wrote: During his grand jury testimony, Hamilton will be alone in a room with at least one prosecutor, up to 23 grand jurors, and a court reporter. His attorney will have to wait outside, and no judge will be present. By law, neither the prosecutors nor the jurors may even acknowledge publicly that the investigation is taking place before issuing an indictment. Read mohttp://www.nydailynews.com/sports/mo...1/2010-08-01_p... Where do people get this stuff? *Witnesses can absolutely talk all they want about their grand jury testimony. * Ever hear of something called the First Amendment? *Last time I checked federal courts enforce that little 'rule' too. Thanks, Magilla You're out of your area of expertise - stick to bananas, whores and Liz Hatch - which are all kind of the same thing. Use em once and throw them away |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|